Electronic cigarette liquid and device parameters and aerosol characteristics: A survey of regular users

INTRODUCTION

Electronic cigarettes are widely variable devices, typically with user definable liquid and device parameters. Yet, little is known about how regular users manipulate these parameters. There is also limited understanding of what factors drive electronic cigarette use and liquid purchasing, and whether two common ingredients, propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin, alter the subjective effects of these devices.

METHODS

During the spring of 2016 522 adults, who reported daily use of electronic cigarettes containing nicotine, completed a survey on electronic cigarettes. Survey questions included an electronic cigarette dependence questionnaire, questions on tobacco and electronic cigarette use, and device and liquid preferences.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine percent of respondents reported using another tobacco product, which was positively associated with level of nicotine dependence. On average, devices were set to 28.3 (SD = 24.2) watts. Ability to change device voltage, and level of resistance typically used, was significantly associated with level of nicotine dependence. Amount of liquid consumed, nicotine concentration, and milligrams of nicotine used per week, were positively associated with nicotine dependence. Participants rated 'good taste' as the most important consideration when using and purchasing liquids, and propylene glycol is associated with undesirable effects and vegetable glycerin with desirable effects.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that electronic cigarette users utilize a wide range device parameter settings and liquid variables, and that individuals with greater nicotine dependence favor voltage control devices, and lower resistance heating elements. Taste is a key factor for electronic cigarette selection, and concentrations of propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin may have a significant impact on the reinforcing effects of liquids.

Nicotine emissions from electronic cigarettes: Individual and interactive effects of propylene glycol to vegetable glycerin composition and device power output

INTRODUCTION

The power output of e-cigarettes varies considerably, as does the composition of liquids used with these products. Most e-cigarette liquids contain two primary solvents: propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG). The primary aim of this study was to examine the extent to which PG and VG composition and device power interact with each other to influence e-cigarette nicotine emissions.

METHODS

Aerosols were generated using a 2nd generation e-cigarette and an automatic smoking machine. Nicotine was measured in aerosols, via gas chromatography, produced from three solutions containing pure PG, pure VG, or a mixture of both solvents (50:50) across three different power settings (4.3, 6.7, and 9.6 W).

RESULTS

At the lowest power setting, nicotine yield increased significantly as more PG was added to the solution. However, as device power was increased, differences in nicotine yield across liquids became less pronounced. At the highest power setting (9.6 W), nicotine yields did not differ across the three liquids examined.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that the extent to which e-cigarette liquid PG and VG composition influences nicotine emissions is dependent on device power. Thus, device power may influence e-cigarette nicotine emissions to a greater degree relative to solvent concentrations.

Assessing electronic cigarette effects and regulatory impact: Challenges with user self-reported device power

BACKGROUND

Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) aerosolize liquids for user inhalation that usually contain nicotine. ECIG nicotine emission is determined, in part, by user behavior, liquid nicotine concentration, and electrical power. Whether users are able to report accurately nicotine concentration and device electrical power has not been evaluated. This study's purpose was to examine if ECIG users could provide data relevant to understanding ECIG nicotine emission, particularly liquid nicotine concentration (mg/ml) as well as battery voltage (V) and heater resistance (ohms, Ω) - needed to calculate power (watts, W).

METHODS

Adult ECIG users (N=165) were recruited from Los Angeles, CA for research studies examining the effects of ECIG use. We asked all participants who visited the laboratory to report liquid nicotine concentration, V, and Ω.

RESULTS

Liquid nicotine concentration was reported by 89.7% (mean=9.5mg/ml, SD=7.3), and responses were consistent with the distribution of liquids available in commonly marketed products. The majority could not report voltage (51.5%) or resistance (63.6%). Of the 40 participants (24.8%) who reported voltage and resistance, there was a substantial power range (2.2-32,670W) the upper limit of which exceeds that of the highest ECIG reported by any user to our knowledge (i.e., 2512W). If 2512W is taken as the upper limit, only 30 (18.2%) reported valid results (mean 237.3W, SD=370.6; range=2.2-1705.3W).

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory, survey, and other researchers interested in understanding ECIG effects to inform users and policymakers may need to use methods other than user self-report to obtain information regarding device power.