Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mm Hg at rest, measured during right heart catheterization. There is still insufficient evidence to add an exercise criterion to this definition. The term pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) describes a subpopulation of patients with PH characterized hemodynamically by the presence of pre-capillary PH including an end-expiratory pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤ 15 mm Hg and a pulmonary vascular resistance >3 Wood units. Right heart catheterization remains essential for a diagnosis of PH or PAH. This procedure requires further standardization, including uniformity of the pressure transducer zero level at the midthoracic line, which is at the level of the left atrium. One of the most common problems in the diagnostic workup of patients with PH is the distinction between PAH and PH due to left heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A normal PAWP does not rule out the presence of HFpEF. Volume or exercise challenge during right heart catheterization may be useful to unmask the presence of left heart disease, but both tools require further evaluation before their use in general practice can be recommended. Early diagnosis of PAH remains difficult, and screening programs in asymptomatic patients are feasible only in high-risk populations, particularly in patients with systemic sclerosis, for whom recent data suggest that a combination of clinical assessment and pulmonary function testing including diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, biomarkers, and echocardiography has a higher predictive value than echocardiography alone.

Pressure reflection in the pulmonary circulation by echocardiography in patients with left heart disease indicates reactive pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVES

The two hemodynamic profiles in left heart disease (LHD) with pulmonary hypertension (PH), passive PH with increased pulmonary venous pressure and reactive PH with increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR > 3 Wood units, WU), are difficult to distinguish non-invasively. We hypothesized that echocardiographic signs of pressure reflection (PR) in the pulmonary circulation can be used to diagnose reactive PH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study comprised 122 patients divided into three groups: patients without PH (No PH, n = 61), patients with LHD, PH and normal PVR (passive PH, n = 29) and patients with LHD, PH and increased PVR (reactive PH, n = 32). Echocardiography and right heart catheterization were performed within 24 h. Three parameters were selected related to PR [the acceleration of flow in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), the interval and the augmentation of pressure between peak RVOT flow and peak RV pressure]. Cutoff values aiming at ruling in (high positive likelihood ratio, PLR) and ruling out (low negative likelihood ratio, NLR) increased PVR were determined using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

The proportions of the patients with PH and PVR > 3 WU were 50% and 29%. Twenty-one percent had both increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and PVR. The area under the ROC curve for the PR parameters was 0.82-0.89. The PLR with ruling in cutoff values ranged from 4.7 to 9.4. The NLR with ruling out cutoff values ranged from 0.20 to 0.12.

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiographic assessment of PR in patients with LHD can be used to identify or exclude reactive PH.

Noninvasive monitoring of serial changes in pulmonary vascular resistance and acute vasodilator testing using cardiac magnetic resonance

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to evaluate the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to monitor acute and long-term changes in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) noninvasively.

BACKGROUND

PVR monitoring during the follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and the response to vasodilator testing require invasive right heart catheterization.

METHODS

An experimental study in pigs was designed to evaluate the ability of CMR to monitor: 1) an acute increase in PVR generated by acute pulmonary embolization (n = 10); 2) serial changes in PVR in chronic PH (n = 22); and 3) changes in PVR during vasodilator testing in chronic PH (n = 10). CMR studies were performed with simultaneous hemodynamic assessment using a CMR-compatible Swan-Ganz catheter. Average flow velocity in the main pulmonary artery (PA) was quantified with phase contrast imaging. Pearson correlation and mixed model analysis were used to correlate changes in PVR with changes in CMR-quantified PA velocity. Additionally, PVR was estimated from CMR data (PA velocity and right ventricular ejection fraction) using a formula previously validated.

RESULTS

Changes in PA velocity strongly and inversely correlated with acute increases in PVR induced by pulmonary embolization (r = -0.92), serial PVR fluctuations in chronic PH (r = -0.89), and acute reductions during vasodilator testing (r = -0.89, p ≤ 0.01 for all). CMR-estimated PVR showed adequate agreement with invasive PVR (mean bias -1.1 Wood units,; 95% confidence interval: -5.9 to 3.7) and changes in both indices correlated strongly (r = 0.86, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CMR allows for noninvasive monitoring of acute and chronic changes in PVR in PH. This capability may be valuable in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with PH.