Impact of vessel volume on thermodilution measurements in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Two invasive methods are available to estimate microvascular resistance: bolus and continuous thermodilution. Comparative studies have revealed a lack of concordance between measurements of microvascular resistance obtained through these techniques.

AIMS

This study aimed to examine the influence of vessel volume on bolus thermodilution measurements.

METHODS

We prospectively included patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) undergoing bolus and continuous thermodilution assessments. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography to extract vessel volume. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was defined as coronary flow reserve (CFR) < 2.0. Measurements of absolute microvascular resistance (in Woods units) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) were compared before and after volumetric adjustment.

RESULTS

Overall, 94 patients with ANOCA were included in this study. The mean age was 64.7 ± 10.8 years, 48% were female, and 19% had diabetes. The prevalence of CMD was 16% based on bolus thermodilution, while continuous thermodilution yielded a prevalence of 27% (Cohen's Kappa 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.65). There was no correlation in microvascular resistance between techniques (r = 0.17, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.36, p = 0.104). The adjustment of IMR by vessel volume significantly increased the agreement with absolute microvascular resistance derived from continuous thermodilution (r = 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.63, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ANOCA, invasive methods based on coronary thermodilution yielded conflicting results for the assessment of CMD. Adjusting IMR with vessel volume improved the agreement with continuous thermodilution for the assessment of microvascular resistance. These findings strongly suggest the importance of considering vessel volume when interpreting bolus thermodilution assessment.

Coronary Flow Reserve and Myocardial Resistance Reserve Changes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Aortic Stenosis

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) induces an alteration in hemodynamic conditions that are responsible for coronary microvasculature impairment. Relief of AS by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is expected to improve the coronary artery hemodynamic. We aimed to assess the midterm effects of TAVI in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and myocardial resistance reserve (MRR) by a continuous intracoronary thermodilution technique. At-rest and hyperemic coronary flow was measured by a continuous thermodilution technique in 23 patients with AS and compared with that in 17 matched controls, and repeated 6 ± 3 months after TAVI in 11 of the patients with AS. In patients with AS, absolute coronary flow at rest was significantly greater, and absolute resistance at rest was significantly less, than in controls (p <0.01 for both), causing less CFR and MRR (1.73 ± 0.4 vs 2.85 ± 1.1, p <0.01 and 1.95 ± 0.4 vs 3.22 ± 1.4, p <0.01, respectively). TAVI implantation yielded a significant 35% increase in CFR (p >0.01) and a 39% increase in MRR (p <0.01) driven by absolute coronary flow at rest reduction (p = 0.03). In patients with AS, CFR and MRR determined by continuous thermodilution are significantly impaired. At 6-month follow-up, TAVI improves these indexes and partially relieves the pathophysiologic alterations, leading to a partial restoration of CFR and MRR.

Measuring Absolute Coronary Flow and Microvascular Resistance by Thermodilution: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction remains challenging, primarily due to the lack of direct measurements of absolute coronary blood flow (Q) and microvascular resistance (Rμ). However, there has been recent progress with the development and validation of continuous intracoronary thermodilution, which offers a simplified and validated approach for clinical use. This technique enables direct quantification of Q and Rμ, leading to precise and accurate evaluation of the coronary microcirculation. To ensure consistent and reliable results, it is crucial to follow a standardized protocol when performing continuous intracoronary thermodilution measurements. This document aims to summarize the principles of thermodilution-derived absolute coronary flow measurements and propose a standardized method for conducting these assessments. The proposed standardization serves as a guide to ensure the best practice of the method, enhancing the clinical assessment of the coronary microcirculation.

Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microcirculation: A State-of-the-Art Review

A significant proportion of patients presenting with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia have no "significant" epicardial disease; thereby, the assessment of coronary microcirculation gained an important role in improving diagnosis and guiding therapy. In fact, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) could be found in a large proportion of these patients, supporting both symptoms and signs of myocardial ischemia. However, CMD represents a diagnostic challenge for two main reasons: (1) the small dimension of the coronary microvasculature prevents direct angiographic visualization, and (2) despite the availability of specific diagnostic tools, they remain invasive and underused in the current clinical practice. For these reasons, CMD remains underdiagnosed, and most of the patients remain with no specific treatment and quality-of-life-limiting symptoms. Of note, recent evidence suggests that a "full physiology" approach for the assessment of the whole coronary vasculature may offer a significant benefit in terms of symptom improvement among patients presenting with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. We analyze the pathophysiology of coronary microvascular dysfunction, providing the readers with a guide for the invasive assessment of coronary microcirculation, together with the available evidence supporting its use in clinical practice.

Microvascular Resistance Reserve for Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: JACC Technology Corner

The need for a quantitative and operator-independent assessment of coronary microvascular function is increasingly recognized. We propose the theoretical framework of microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) as an index specific for the microvasculature, independent of autoregulation and myocardial mass, and based on operator-independent measurements of absolute values of coronary flow and pressure. In its general form, MRR equals coronary flow reserve (CFR) divided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) corrected for driving pressures. In 30 arteries, pressure, temperature, and flow velocity measurements were obtained simultaneously at baseline (BL), during infusion of saline at 10 mL/min (rest) and 20 mL/min (hyperemia). A strong correlation was found between continuous thermodilution-derived MRR and Doppler MRR (r = 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.93; P < 0.001). MRR was independent from the epicardial resistance, the lower the FFR value, the greater the difference between MRR and CFR. Therefore, MRR is proposed as a specific, quantitative, and operator-independent metric to quantify coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Accurate assessment of coronary blood flow by continuous thermodilution technique: Validation in a swine model

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of coronary thermodilution measurements made with the RayFlow® infusion catheter.

BACKGROUND

Measurements of absolute coronary blood flow (ABF) and absolute microvascular resistance (R_μ ) by continuous coronary thermodilution can be obtained in humans but their accuracy using a novel dedicated infusion catheter has not yet been validated. We compared ABF values obtained at different infusion rates to coronary blood flow (CBF) values obtained using flow probes, in swine.

METHODS

Twelve domestic swine were instrumented with coronary flow probes placed around the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries. ABF was assessed with the RayFlow® infusion catheter during continuous saline infusion at fixed rates of 5 (n = 14), 10 (n = 15), 15 (n = 19), and 20 (n = 12) ml/min.

RESULTS

In the 60 measurements, ABF measured using thermodilution averaged 41 ± 17 ml/min (range from 17 to 90) and CBF values obtained with the coronary flow probes averaged 37 ± 18 ml/min (range from 8 to 87). The corresponding R_μ values were 1532 ± 791 (range from 323 to 5103) and 1903 ± 1162 (range from 287 to 6000) Woods units using thermodilution and coronary flow probe assessments, respectively. ABF and R_μ values measured using thermodilution were significantly correlated with the corresponding measurements obtained using coronary flow probes (R = 0.84 [0.73-0.95] and R = 0.80 [0.69-0.88], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

ABF and R_μ assessed by continuous saline infusion through a RayFlow® catheter closely correlate with measurements obtained with the gold standard coronary flow probes in a swine model.

Intracoronary Saline-Induced Hyperemia During Coronary Thermodilution Measurements of Absolute Coronary Blood Flow: An Animal Mechanistic Study

Background

Absolute hyperemic coronary blood flow and microvascular resistances can be measured by continuous thermodilution with a dedicated infusion catheter. We aimed to determine the mechanisms of this hyperemic response in animal.

Methods and Results

Twenty open chest pigs were instrumented with flow probes on coronary arteries. The following possible mechanisms of saline‐induced hyperemia were explored compared with maximal hyperemia achieve with adenosine by testing: (1) various infusion rates; (2) various infusion content and temperature; (3) NO production inhibition with L‐arginine methyl ester and endothelial denudation; (4) effects of vibrations generated by rotational atherectomy and of infusion through one end‐hole versus side‐holes. Saline infusion rates of 5, 10 and 15 mL/min did not reach maximal hyperemia as compared with adenosine. Percentage of coronary blood flow expressed in percent of the coronary blood flow after adenosine were 48±17% at baseline, 57±18% at 5 mL/min, 65±17% at 10 mL/min, 82±26% at 15 mL/min and 107±18% at 20 mL/min. Maximal hyperemia was observed during infusion of both saline at body temperature and glucose 5%, after endothelial denudation, l‐arginine methyl ester administration, and after stent implantation. The activation of a Rota burr in the first millimeters of the epicardial artery also induced maximal hyperemia. Maximal hyperemia was achieved by infusion through lateral side‐holes but not through an end‐hole catheter.

Conclusions

Infusion of saline at 20 mL/min through a catheter with side holes in the first millimeters of the epicardial artery induces maximal hyperemia. The data indicate that this vasodilation is related neither to the composition/temperature of the indicator nor is it endothelial mediated. It is suggested that it could be elicited by epicardial wall vibrations.

In vitro test-retest repeatability of invasive physiological indices to assess coronary flow

AIMS

Several invasive techniques are available in clinical practice to assess coronary flow. Nevertheless, the test-retest repeatability of these techniques in a controlled setting has not been reported. Therefore, we sought to evaluate fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microvascular resistance (IMR), and absolute coronary blood flow (ABF) with absolute microvascular resistance (AMR) test-retest repeatability using a coronary flow simulator.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a coronary flow simulator (FFR WetLab version 2.0; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA), we created stenoses ranging from 0% to 70%, with 10% increments. Three different flows were established with their hyperemic phases, and two consecutive measurements were obtained, evaluating the following indices: FFR, CFR, IMR, ABF, and AMR, using a pressure/temperature wire and an infusion catheter. One hundred and thirty-eight pairs of measurements were performed. Test-retest reliability was compared in 48 FFR, 18 CFR, 24 IMR, 24 ABF, and 24 AMR. Test-retest repeatability showed excellent reproducibility for FFR, ABF, and AMR; respectively 0.98 (0.97-0.99), 0.92 (0.81-0.97) and 0.91 (0.79-0.96) (P < 0.0001 for all). However, test-retest repeatability was weaker for IMR and poor for CFR; respectively 0.53 (0.16-0.77) (P = 0.006) and 0.27 (-0.26-0.67) (P = 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a coronary flow simulator, FFR and ABF with AMR had excellent test-retest reliability. IMR and CFR demonstrated weaker test-retest reliability.