Multicenter Clinicopathologic Correlation of Kidney Biopsies Performed in COVID-19 Patients Presenting With Acute Kidney Injury or Proteinuria

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Kidney biopsy data inform us about pathologic processes associated with infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We conducted a multicenter evaluation of kidney biopsy findings in living patients to identify various kidney disease pathology findings in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and their association with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We identified 14 native and 3 transplant kidney biopsies performed for cause in patients with documented recent or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection treated at 7 large hospital systems in the United States.

OBSERVATIONS

Men and women were equally represented in this case series, with a higher proportion of Black (n=8) and Hispanic (n=5) patients. All 17 patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, but only 3 presented with severe COVID-19 symptoms. Acute kidney injury (n=15) and proteinuria (n=11) were the most common indications for biopsy and these symptoms developed concurrently or within 1 week of COVID-19 symptoms in all patients. Acute tubular injury (n=14), collapsing glomerulopathy (n=7), and endothelial injury/thrombotic microangiopathy (n=6) were the most common histologic findings. 2 of the 3 transplant recipients developed active antibody-mediated rejection weeks after COVID-19. 8 patients required dialysis, but others improved with conservative management.

LIMITATIONS

Small study size and short clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Cases of even symptomatically mild COVID-19 were accompanied by acute kidney injury and/or heavy proteinuria that prompted a diagnostic kidney biopsy. Although acute tubular injury was seen among most of them, uncommon pathology such as collapsing glomerulopathy and acute endothelial injury were detected, and most of these patients progressed to irreversible kidney injury and dialysis.

COVID-19-Related Collapsing Glomerulopathy in a Kidney Transplant Recipient

We report a case of a kidney transplant recipient who presented with acute kidney injury and nephrotic-range proteinuria in a context of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Kidney biopsy revealed collapsing glomerulopathy. Droplet-based digital polymerase chain reaction did not detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the biopsy fragment, and the virus was barely detectable in plasma at the time of the biopsy. SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia peaked several days later, followed by a seroconversion despite the absence of circulating CD19-positive lymphocytes at admission due to rituximab-based treatment of antibody-mediated rejection 3 months earlier. Genotyping for the 2 risk alleles of the apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene revealed that the donor carried the low-risk G0/G2 genotype. This case illustrates that coronavirus disease 2019 infection may promote a collapsing glomerulopathy in kidney allografts with a low-risk APOL1 genotype in the absence of detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the kidney and that podocyte injury may precede SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia.

Association of HLA Typing and Alloimmunity With Posttransplantation Membranous Nephropathy: A Multicenter Case Series

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES

Posttransplantation membranous nephropathy (MN) represents a rare complication of kidney transplantation that can be classified as recurrent or de novo. The clinical, pathologic, and immunogenetic characteristics of posttransplantation MN and the differences between de novo and recurrent MN are not well understood.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We included 77 patients from 5 North American and European medical centers with post-kidney transplantation MN (27 de novo and 50 recurrent). Patients with MN in the native kidney who received kidney allografts but did not develop recurrent MN were used as nonrecurrent controls (n = 43). To improve understanding of posttransplantation MN, we compared de novo MN with recurrent MN and then contrasted recurrent MN with nonrecurrent controls.

FINDINGS

Compared with recurrent MN, de novo MN was less likely to be classified as primary MN (OR, 0.04; P < 0.001) and had more concurrent antibody-mediated rejection (OR, 12.0; P < 0.001) and inferior allograft survival (HR for allograft failure, 3.2; P = 0.007). HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DR17 antigens were more common in recipients with recurrent MN compared with those with de novo MN; however, the frequency of these recipient antigens in recurrent MN was similar to that in nonrecurrent MN controls. Among the 93 kidney transplant recipients with native kidney failure attributed to MN, older recipient age (HR per each year older, 1.03; P = 0.02), recipient HLA-A3 antigen (HR, 2.5; P = 0.003), steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens (HR, 2.84; P < 0.001), and living related allograft (HR, 1.94; P = 0.03) were predictors of MN recurrence.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective case series, limited sample size due to rarity of the disease, nonstandardized nature of data collection and biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo and recurrent MN likely represent separate diseases. De novo MN is associated with humoral alloimmunity and guarded outcome. Potential predisposing factors for recurrent MN include recipients who are older, recipient HLA-A3 antigen, steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen, and living related donor kidney.

Viral infections directly involved in kidney allograft function

Modern immunosuppressive therapy has dramatically reduced the incidence of acute rejection and improved graft survival in kidney transplant patients. However, infectious complications remain an important issue. Amongst the various pathogens, viruses such as adenovirus and polyomavirus BK can directly cause acute or chronic graft dysfunction. Adenovirus mainly causes haemorrhagic cystitis and tubulointerstitial nephritis in kidney transplant patients. While patients show apparent clinical symptoms such as fever, dysuria, gross haematuria, frequency and urgency of urination, and most patients show acute graft dysfunction, these symptoms and graft dysfunction are reversible. Polyomavirus BK infection, however, is asymptomatic but graft outcome is poor if the patient develops tissue-invasive nephropathy confirmed by graft biopsy. Recently, an attempt to create a pathological classification for predicting the clinical course has been made by the Banff Working Group on Polyomavirus Nephropathy. With regards to treatment, the basic strategy is a reduction of calcineurin inhibitor and/or antimetabolites, and the effectiveness of several adjunct treatments has been investigated in several clinical trials. There are other unresolved issues, such as the diagnosis of subsequent acute rejection, the definition of remission, methods of resuming immunosuppression and long-term follow-up. Most of all, development of effective vaccines and novel drug discovery are necessary to prevent the development and progression of BKV-associated nephropathy.

Baseline Anti-blood Group Antibody Titers and their Response to Desensitization and Kidney Transplantation

In recent years, immunological barriers historically considered as absolute contraindications to transplantation are being reevaluated. One such barrier is the ABO blood group incompatibility. With better understanding of immunological mechanisms and effective various regimens for controlling it, ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation is now being performed with increasing frequency. For good outcome, most important is to achieve and maintain low anti-blood group antibody titers (ABGATs). Twenty-two patients with ABO-I donors have been studied. The anti-A and anti-B antibody titers (IgG and IgM) were estimated by column agglutination technology using Automated Ortho BioVue System. For desensitization, pretransplant plasmapheresis and/or immunoadsorption and rituximab were used. ABGAT was determined before transplant and periodically after transplant. It was observed that one-third of the patients have low baseline ABGAT. In these cases with low ABGAT, transplant can be performed without any desensitization. In those with titers <1:256, rituximab (two doses of 200 mg weekly) and 3–6 sessions of plasmapheresis can bring down titers to <1:32. In those with titers >1:256, immunoadsorption may be used from the beginning to reduce ABGAT. After transplant, the titers drop to <1:8 in majority. Rise in titers to >1:64 require close observation and biopsy. If there is evidence of antibody-mediated rejection, treatment should be promptly started. Rise in titers 4–6 weeks after transplant is not associated with any graft dysfunction, and hence not of any clinical significance.

Expanding the antibody-mediated component of plasma cell-rich acute rejection: A case series

Renal allograft rejection is mediated by T-cells (T-cell mediated rejection) or by donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) (antibody mediated rejection, ABMR). Plasma cell-rich acute rejection (PCAR) is a unique entity due to its peculiar morphology and poor prognostic behavior. All allograft biopsies done at our center from January 2013 to October 2014 were reviewed, and seven were identified with a diagnosis of PCAR with antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). The allograft biopsies were classified as per the Banff 2007 schema. Immunohistochemistry with C4d, SV 40, CD3, CD20, CD138, kappa and lambda light chain was performed. Total 210 allograft biopsies were performed in the study period of which seven biopsies (3.3%) were diagnosed as PCAR with ABMR. All these were late ABMRs (more than 6 months) with median posttransplant duration of 17 months. The allograft biopsy showed features of PCAR along with glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, and positive C4d. DSA was positive in six patients. All the patients were treated with standard therapeutic measures of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and ABMR including steroids, plasma exchange, rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulins. All the patients had persistent graft dysfunction or graft loss on follow-up.

The value of long-term protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation

Protocol biopsies for the detection and treatment of subclinical rejection in the early period after kidney transplantation are useful for preventing allograft dysfunction. However, little has been reported on the relationship between subclinical rejection and long-term protocol biopsies. In this review, we examine the potential benefits associated with long-term allograft biopsies focusing on the issue of immunological and non-immunological factors. Early detection and treatment of subclinical rejection improves outcome. However, the benefit of long-term allograft biopsies is largely unproved, and the strategy is yet to be widely implemented. The procurement of long-term protocol biopsies for the sole purpose of detecting subclinical rejection may be unwarranted. On the other hand, the early detection of IgA nephropathy using long-term protocol biopsy may improve graft survival. In addition, assessment of long-term protocol biopsies is useful not only for detection of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, but also for follow-up after withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor regimens. Also, identifying normal histology on a protocol biopsy may inform us about the safety of reducing overall immunosuppression. Thus, the potential benefit of long-term protocol biopsy may be of clinical significance for the detection of graft dysfunction as a result of non-immune factors, such as recurrence of glomerulonephritis and calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, rather than subclinical rejection.