Prevalence of residual amblyopia in adulthood and its association on educational outcome and quality of life in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the prevalence of residual amblyopia in adults in a population screened and treated in childhood. We also wanted to evaluate the association of amblyopia on school success, level of education, and quality of life.

METHODS

This is a follow-up study of 2708 subjects of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort. At the age of 46, the subjects took part in ophthalmic examinations, including the measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and refraction. Residual amblyopia was defined as BCVA 20/30 or less (logMAR ≥0.2) in one or both eyes or a two-line interocular visual acuity difference and absence of any pathological ocular factors. The quality of life was assessed with a 15D questionnaire, and educational outcome, school success, and episodic memory with a CANTAB-PAL (paired associates learning) test were evaluated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of amblyopia in the current adult population aged 46 years was 1.3% (n = 36). At 14 years, the amblyopia subjects had had significant differences in mean spherical equivalent between the amblyopic and fellow eye and strabismus more often than controls. No significant differences were observed in the CANTAB-PAL test or in educational outcome. However, amblyopia subjects had significant difficulties in the 15D questionnaire in terms of vision (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Due to screening and treatment in childhood, the number of adults with residual amblyopia was low. Despite minor visual impairment and discomfort, they cope very well in life in terms of educational outcome and quality of life.

Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review

Amblyopia detection is important to ensure proper visual development and avoid permanent decrease of visual acuity. This condition does not produce symptoms, so it is difficult to diagnose if a vision problem actually exists. However, because amblyopia treatment is limited by age, early diagnosis is of paramount relevance. Traditional vision screening (conducted in <3 years) is related with difficulty in getting cooperation from a subject to conduct the eye exam, so accurate objective methods to improve amblyopia detection are necessary. Handheld devices used for photoscreening or autorefraction could offer advantages to improve amblyopia screening because they reduce exploration time to just few seconds, no subject collaboration is needed, and they provide objective information. The purpose of this review is to summarize the main functions and clinical applicability of commercially available devices for early detection of amblyopia and to describe their differences, advantages, and limitations. Although the studies reviewed are heterogeneous (due to wide differences in referral criteria, use of different risk factors, different types of samples studied, etc), these devices provide objective measures in a quick and objective way with a simple outcome report: retest, pass, or refer. However, due to major limitations, these devices are not recommended, and their use in clinical practice is limited.