1
|
Zhu H, Pan X, Zhang L, Sun H, Fan H, Pan Z, Huang C, Shi Z, Ding J, Wang Q, Du Y, Lyu N, Li Z. Effect and safety of anaprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a randomized, rabeprazole-controlled, phase III non-inferiority study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2022; 135:2941-2949. [PMID: 36580650 PMCID: PMC10106214 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pharmacokinetic and clinical behaviors of many proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in peptic ulcer treatment are altered by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms. This non-inferiority study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the novel PPI anaprazole compared with rabeprazole. We also explored the influence of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection status and CYP2C19 polymorphism on anaprazole. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive-drug parallel-controlled, phase III study, Chinese patients with duodenal ulcers were randomized 1:1 to receive rabeprazole 10 mg + anaprazole placebo or rabeprazole placebo + anaprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 4-week ulcer healing rate assessed by blinded independent review. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with improved overall and individual duodenal ulcer symptoms at 4 weeks. Furthermore, exploratory subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint by H. pylori status and CYP2C19 polymorphism was conducted. Adverse events were monitored for safety. Non-inferiority analysis was conducted for the primary endpoint. RESULTS The study enrolled 448 patients (anaprazole, n = 225; rabeprazole, n = 223). The 4-week healing rates were 90.9% and 93.7% for anaprazole and rabeprazole, respectively (difference, -2.8% [95% confidence interval, -7.7%, 2.2%]), demonstrating non-inferiority of anaprazole to rabeprazole. Overall duodenal ulcer symptoms improved in 90.9% and 92.5% of patients, respectively. Improvement rates of individual symptoms were similar between the groups. Healing rates did not significantly differ by H. pylori status or CYP2C19 genotype for either treatment group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for anaprazole (72/220, 32.7%) and rabeprazole (84/219, 38.4%). CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of anaprazole is non-inferior to that of rabeprazole in Chinese patients with duodenal ulcers. REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04215653.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiyun Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Xue Pan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Changhai Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Hongxin Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Huizhen Fan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yichun People's Hospital, Yichun, Jiangxi 336028, China
| | - Zhongwei Pan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meihekou Central Hospital, Meihekou, Jilin 135099, China
| | - Caibin Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341001, China
| | - Zhenwang Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Hefei, Anhui 230011, China
| | - Jin Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321099, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, Anhui 246004, China
| | - Yiqi Du
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Nonghua Lyu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
| | - Zhaoshen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital of Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shu X, Zhu Z, Fu Y, Zhang Z, Wang J, Li X, He S, Fan H, Liu S, Zhang G, Tang J, Huang C, Du Q, Wang X, Xu B, Du Y, Chen Q, Wang B, Chen Y, Duan X, Xie Y, Huo L, Hou X, Lu N. Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:690995. [PMID: 34336894 PMCID: PMC8317206 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.690995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. Herein, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of anaprazole in duodenal mucosal healing, a novel PPI, to that of rabeprazole. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, positive-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group phase II clinical trial, a total of 150 qualified patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers were randomized (1:1:1) to receive rabeprazole 10 mg, anaprazole 20 mg or anaprazole 40 mg for 4 weeks. The ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were compared between groups by independent central review and investigator review. In addition, symptoms and safety were evaluated. Results: Based on the independent central review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 88.0, 85.1, and 87.5%, respectively, in the FAS population and 88.9, 86.0, and 90.9%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −2.9% (95% CI, −16.5–10.7%), and −0.5% (95% CI, −13.5–12.5%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Based on the investigator review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole, and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 72.0, 70.2, and 77.1%, respectively, in the FAS population and 75.6, 72.1, and 79.5%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −1.8% (95% CI, −19.8–16.3%), and 5.1% (95% CI, −12.2–22.3%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Most patients (>90%) eventually achieved complete symptom relief. The incidence rates of adverse events were of no significant differences among the treatment groups. Potential possible better liver tolerance was observed in two anaprazole dose groups than rabeprazole 10 mg group. Conclusion: Both at a dosage of 20 and 40 mg daily, anaprazole, is effective with good safety profile in the treatment of active duodenal ulcers in this Phase 2 study, which allows anaprazole to be advanced to a phase III clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT04503629&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=, Identifier: CTR20181464, NCT04503629.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Shu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhenhua Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yu Fu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhenyu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiangbin Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Pingxiang People's Hospital, Pingxiang, China
| | - Shuixiang He
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Huizhen Fan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yichun People's Hospital, Yichun, China
| | - Side Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Nanfang Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guoxin Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianhua Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Caibin Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Qin Du
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Baohong Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yiqi Du
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Qikui Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bangmao Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying Chen
- Clinical Development, Xuanzhu Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Xianghui Duan
- Statistics, Xuanzhu Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Yong Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Lijuan Huo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiaohua Hou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Nonghua Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|