The distance between the anterior and posterior edges of the fibula at a lateral internal rotation of 15° is associated with postoperative malreduction in patients with an ankle joint fracture combined with a lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury

BACKGROUND

Malreduction remains a problem in patients with an ankle joint fracture combined with a lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Current methods of malreduction evaluation have many limitations, and novel techniques are required.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate the association between the distance between the anterior and posterior edges of the fibula at a 15° lateral internal rotation and postoperative malreduction in patients with an ankle joint fracture combined with a lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study enrolled 187 patients diagnosed with an ankle joint fracture combined with a lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury between January 2020 and January 2022. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their postoperative malreduction condition: the malreduction group and the non-malreduction group. After tibiofibular syndesmosis reduction, a computed tomography (CT) scan was used to measure the distance between the anterior and posterior edges of the fibula at a standard lateral position and a position with a lateral internal rotation of 15°. Demographic data and basic clinical characteristics were recorded for all patients.

RESULTS

The mean distance between the anterior and posterior edges of the fibula was longer in malreduction patients than non-malreduction patients at the standard lateral and 15° lateral internal rotation positions. At a lateral internal rotation of 15°, the distance between the anterior and posterior edges correlated negatively with the postoperative Mazur and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and correlated positively with the length of hospitalization and fracture healing time. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed the potential postoperative malreduction diagnostic value of fibular anterior-posterior edge distance using an internal rotation of 15°. Postoperative AOFAS score, length of hospitalization, fracture healing time, and the distance between the anterior and posterior edges of the fibula at a lateral internal rotation of 15° were independent risk factors of malreduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The fibular anterior-posterior edge distance at an internal rotation of 15° is associated with postoperative ankle joint function and the occurrence of malreduction.

Beyond Hip Fractures: Other Fragility Fractures' Associated Mortality, Functional and Economic Importance: A 2-year-Follow-up

Background

Hip fractures are well researched in orthogeriatric literature. Equivalent investigations for fragility-associated periprosthetic and periosteosynthetic femoral, ankle joint, pelvic ring, and rib fractures are still rare.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate mortality, functional outcome, and socioeconomic parameters associated to the upper-mentioned fragility fractures prospectively in a 2-year follow-up.

Methods

Over the course of a year, all periprosthetic and periosteosynthetic femoral fractures (PPFF), ankle joint fractures (AJ), pelvic ring fractures (PR), and rib fractures (RF), that were treated on a co-managed orthogeriatric ward, were assessed. Parker Mobility Score (PMS), Barthel Index (BI), place of residence, and care level were recorded. After 2 years, patients and/or relatives were contacted by mailed questionnaires or phone calls in order to calculate mortality and reevaluate the mentioned parameters.

Results

Follow-up rate was 77.7%, assessing 87 patients overall. The relative mortality risk was significantly increased for PR (2.9 (95% CI: 1.5–5.4)) and PPFF (3.5 (95% CI: 1.2–5.8)) but not for RF (1.5 (95% CI: 0.4–2.6)) and AJ (2.0 (95% CI: 0.0–4.0)). Every fracture group except AJ showed significantly higher BI on average at follow-up. PMS was, respectively, reduced on average for PR and RF insignificantly, but significantly for PPFF and AJ in comparison to pre-hospital values. 10.0–27.3% (each group) of patients had to leave their homes permanently; care levels were raised in 30.0–61.5% of cases.

Discussion

This investigation provides a perspective for further larger examinations. PR and PPFF correlate with significant increased mortality risk. Patients suffering from PPFF, PR, and RF were able to significantly recover in their activities of daily living. AJ and PPFF conclude in significant reduction of PMS after 2 years.

Conclusion

Any fragility fracture has its impact on mortality, function, and socioeconomic aspects and shall not be underestimated. Despite some fractures not being the most common, they are still present in daily practice.