1
|
LIU J, YANG X, SHEN K, ZENG L, SUN Y. [Chloroxoquinoline inhibits invasion in breast cancer via down-regulating Rho/Rho kinase signaling pathway]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2019; 48:631-637. [PMID: 31955537 PMCID: PMC10412948 DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.12.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of chloroxoquinoline on cytoskeleton of breast cancer cells and its relation with Rho/Rho kinase signaling pathway. METHODS Breast cancer Bcap37 and MDA-MB-453 cells were treated with different concentrations of chloroxoquinoline. Wound healing and Transwell assay were conducted to detect cell migration and invasion, respectively. Rhodamine-phalloidin staining and immunofluorescent staining were used to observe the polymerization state of F-actin and the expression of α-Tublin in breast cancer cells, respectively. Western blot was used to detect the phosphorylation level of key protein in Rho/Rho kinase signaling pathway. RESULTS Compared with the control group, chloroxoquinoline treatment induced dose-dependent decrease in cell migration and invasion, and Bcap37 and MDA-MB-453 cells treated with chloroxoquinoline showed dose-dependent changes in cell morphology and decrease in cell body. The staining of F-actin and α-Tublin was irregular and clustered. Furthermore, treatment of chloroxoquinoline down-regulated the phosphorylation of the Rho/Rho kinase signaling proteins Cofilin, Limk and Rock2 (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Chloroxoquinoline inhibits the cytoskeleton in breast cancer Bcap37 and MDA-MB-453 cells and inhibits cell migration. This effect may be associated with down-regulation of Rho/Rho kinase signaling pathway.
Collapse
|
2
|
Li CH, Bies RR, Wang Y, Sharma MR, Karovic S, Werk L, Edelman MJ, Miller AA, Vokes EE, Oto A, Ratain MJ, Schwartz LH, Maitland ML. Comparative Effects of CT Imaging Measurement on RECIST End Points and Tumor Growth Kinetics Modeling. Clin Transl Sci 2016; 9:43-50. [PMID: 26790562 PMCID: PMC4760886 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Quantitative assessments of tumor burden and modeling of longitudinal growth could improve phase II oncology trials. To identify obstacles to wider use of quantitative measures we obtained recorded linear tumor measurements from three published lung cancer trials. Model-based parameters of tumor burden change were estimated and compared with similarly sized samples from separate trials. Time-to-tumor growth (TTG) was computed from measurements recorded on case report forms and a second radiologist blinded to the form data. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-based progression-free survival (PFS) measures were perfectly concordant between the original forms data and the blinded radiologist re-evaluation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 1), but these routine interrater differences in the identification and measurement of target lesions were associated with an average 18-week delay (range, -20 to 55 weeks) in TTG (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.32). To exploit computational metrics for improving statistical power in small clinical trials will require increased precision of tumor burden assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Li
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - R R Bies
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Y Wang
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - M R Sharma
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - S Karovic
- University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - L Werk
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - M J Edelman
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - A A Miller
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - E E Vokes
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - A Oto
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - M J Ratain
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - L H Schwartz
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - M L Maitland
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|