Assessment of Digital Intraoral Periapical Radiograph for the Detection of Apical Root Resorption in Inflammatory Periapical Pathologies: A Radiovisiography Study

Introduction Resorption often takes the form of external inflammatory root resorption. Apical periodontitis or an apical cyst is the most typical cause of external inflammatory root resorption. Failure of endodontic treatment can occur if severe apical root resorption occurs.This is due to the difficulty of reaching these sites.Apical root resorption is usually discovered during routine radiographs and is usually in its later stages. If the lesion is advanced, extraction is the only viable solution. An accurate diagnosis of incipient root resorption is essential. This research is designed to analyze the effectiveness of digital intraoral periapical radiographs in assessing apical root resorption (ARR) related to periapical pathologies. Material and methods This cross-sectional radiographic observational research was conducted in a dental college and hospital in central India. Radiovisiography (RVG) images of 190 patients' teeth with inflammatory periapical pathologies were evaluated to determine the presence or absence of resorption in the apical area of the root. After the radiographic assessment of the apical root resorption, the extraction of the affected teeth was done under all aseptic conditions. The periapical tissue was sent for histological analysis and the extracted tooth sample was examined for the presence or absence of apical root resorption. Results In comparison to apical periodontitis, the proportion of severe root resorption patients was significantly higher in abscess and periapical granuloma. Using Pearson's Chi-square test, the difference in patient proportions according to the kind of resorption in the three radiological diagnosis groups was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.0058. Conclusion It was concluded that on radiographic examination, digital intraoral periapical radiographs were found to be accurate in determining periapical apical pathologies and apical root resorption.

3D assessment of alveolar bone alterations in orthodontic movement among Indians

Apical root resorption, which is characterised as a biological or abnormal phenomenon that shortens the length of the root apex, is additional typical iatrogenic impact of orthodontic tooth movement that may jeopardise the effectiveness of treatment and tooth lifespan. The main goals of the current retrospective investigation were to assess the dimensions of alveolar bone alterations that come along with orthodontic movement and to look into the frequency and extent of resorption of root in maxillary incisors across categories that were similarly managed with clear aligners (OCA) and fixed appliances (OFA) using CBCT. The study included 50 subjects who were divided into two categories with 25 study subjects in each category. Category OFA: Subjects receiving OFA (n=25). A CBCT scan was used to get three-dimensional pictures at the beginning of therapy as well as at the end of therapy. The overall resorption of root at apical region in OFA group was 0.63±0.21 mm. The overall resorption of root at apical region in OCA group was 0.32 ±0.36 mm. The difference in observation was statistically significant (p= 0.000) with reduced resorption of root at apical region in clear aligners. It was concluded that the decrease in thickness of alveolar bone was greater in orthodontic fixed appliances group as compared to clear aligners. The resorption of root at apical region was lesser in clear aligners group as compared to fixed appliances.

Endodontic-orthodontic interactions: a review and treatment recommendations

The literature is replete with articles describing the many and varied interactions between endodontic treatment and orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), often reporting conflicting views and findings, which creates confusion for clinicians. Original research and review articles have described aspects such as apical root resorption and potential pulpal complications of teeth related to OTM. Some interactions are of relatively minor clinical significance, whilst others may have adverse consequences. A history of dental trauma before or during OTM further complicates the interactions. This review re-assesses the historical literature on endodontic-orthodontic interactions in light of more recent research and presents guidelines for managing clinical situations involving both disciplines. © 2023 Australian Dental Association.

Comparative Evaluation of Orthodontically-Induced Root Resorption Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Orthopantomogram (OPG) During En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Orthodontically induced apical root resorption is an inescapable consequence of fixed orthodontics. This root resorption causes post-orthodontic complications in some treated cases. To avoid these complications proper diagnosis of the site and amount of resorption is important. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic ability of Orthopantomogram (OPG) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in detecting apical root resorption after en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in a sample of Saudi Arabian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample comprised of 30 patients diagnosed with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. The treatment plan involved extraction of all first premolars followed by en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth. OPG images were obtained at the beginning of treatment and after the end of the retraction phase and a CBCT image were also obtained for the same patient at the same centre other than orthodontic reason like implant placement, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) problems, sleep apnea, etc. after orthodontic treatment completion. The scoring system of Levander and Malmgren was used to assess the degree and severity of root resorption in the maxillary incisors. Dalhbergs error and coefficient of reliability (ICC) were used to calculate the correlation between the two sets of readings. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare the difference in root resorption between OPG and CBCT images. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

No resorption was observed in 39.2% and 16.6% of incisors with OPG and CBCT respectively. Mild resorption was observed in 50% and 66.7% of incisors with OPG and CBCT respectively. Moderate resorption was found in 10% and 15% of incisors with OPG and CBCT respectively. Severe root resorption was found in 0.8% and 1.7% of incisors with OPG and CBCT respectively. Statistically, significant differences were found in both methods of evaluation in all grades of root resorption for all the maxillary incisors (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

OPG had consistently underestimated the amount of orthodontically induced apical root resorption when compared to CBCT. OPG is only useful for the primary evaluation of root resorption. CBCT can be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool on a case-to-case basis in patients with moderate to severe root resorption to manage post-orthodontic treatment complications.

Orthodontic treatment recommendation and expected adverse reactions in patients with a history of dental trauma: A survey among general dentists, paediatric dentists, and orthodontic specialists

BACKGROUND

Trauma-induced adverse reactions may trigger complications when moving teeth orthodontically.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of dental practitioners about this topic.

DESIGN

A questionnaire survey was organized among general dentists, paediatric dentists, and orthodontists in Flanders (Belgium). Three clinical cases describing trauma-induced tooth damage (tooth ankylosis, apical root resorption, and pulp/root canal obliteration) were presented, followed by a set of questions.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 121 general dentists (GD), 47 paediatric dentists (PD), and 99 orthodontic specialists (OS). In the case with ankylosis, impossibility to move the tooth orthodontically was reported as most frequent adverse reaction (82.8% of GD, 95.7% of PD, and 100.0% of OS) (P < .001). In the situation of apical root resorption, the most frequently reported adverse event was progressive apical root resorption (78.9%, 85.7%, and 88.8% respectively; P = .265). Most frequently mentioned adverse reaction in the case with pulp and root canal obliteration was tooth discoloration (64.1%, 57.1%, and 78.3%; P = .055), followed by apical root resorption (57.4%, 56.8%, and 68.7%; P = .283). Orthodontic treatment recommendation differed among specific clinical situations but also among groups of dental practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

Important knowledge gaps exist regarding the orthodontic managment of traumatized teeth. This topic requires more attention in undergraduate training, specialist training, and continuing education.

Accuracy of Different Apex Locators in Teeth with Simulated Apical Root Resorption: an In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Accurate working length (WL) determination is necessary in achieving optimal healing by non-surgical root canal therapy in teeth with inflammatory apical root resorption. Electronic apex locators (EALs) are one of the mainstays in determination of WL of teeth.

AIM

This study evaluated the accuracy of three EALs [RootZX (third generation), iPex (fourth generation) and Raypex 6 (modification of a fifth generation)] in determining the WL of teeth with simulated apical root resorption in permanent teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty freshly extracted maxillary anterior teeth were collected and a 45° oblique cut was made at the root apex with a disc to simulate apical root resorption. Actual working length (AWL) was determined by direct visual method and was used as a control. Electronic working length (EWL) values were measured by three different apex locators that are RootZX (Group I), iPex (Group II) and Raypex 6 (Group III) at apex, 0.5 mm and 1 mm from apex. All values obtained were tabulated and statistical evaluation was carried out.

RESULTS

At apex, EWL obtained using iPex (p=0.05) showed a statistically significant difference from AWL. At 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm tolerance, iPex showed non-acceptability for WL measurement in 67.5% and 17.5% of samples compared to Root ZX (12.5% and 2.5%) and Raypex (7.5% and none) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that Raypex 6 and RootZX show statistically significant accuracy in WL measurement compared with iPex in teeth with apical root resorption.

Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for detecting simulated apical root resorption

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiography for detecting simulated external apical root resorption (EARR) in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample consisted of 160 single-rooted premolar teeth for simulating EARR of varying degrees according to four setups: no (intact teeth), mild (cavity of 1.0 mm in diameter and depth on root surface), moderate (0.4 mm, 0.8 mm, 1.2 mm, and 1.6 mm root shortening), and severe (2.4 mm, 2.8 mm, 3.2 mm, and 3.6 mm root shortening). Two groups of radiographic images were obtained via CBCT and periapical radiography. The absence or presence and the severity for all resorption lesions were evaluated blindly by two calibrated observers.

RESULTS

With the CBCT method, the rates of correct classification of no, mild, moderate, and severe EARR were 96.3%, 98.8%, 41.3%, and 87.5%, respectively; with the periapical radiography method, the rates were 82.5%, 41.3%, 68.8%, and 92.5%, respectively. Highly significant differences were found between the two imaging methods for detection of mild (P < .001), moderate (P < .001), and all EARR (P < .001). For detection of all EARR, the sensitivity and specificity values were 75.8% and 96.3% for CBCT, compared with 67.5% and 82.5% for periapical radiography.

CONCLUSION

CBCT is a reliable diagnostic tool to detect simulated EARR, whereas periapical radiography underestimates it. However, if a periapical radiograph is already available to the diagnosis of EARR, CBCT should be used with extreme caution to avoid additional radiation exposure.