1
|
Wang T, Yan L, Yang X, Geng D, Xu G, Wang A. Optimal Design of Array Coils for Multi-Target Adjustable Electromagnetic Brain Stimulation System. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:bioengineering10050568. [PMID: 37237638 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10050568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Temporal interference magnetic stimulation is a novel noninvasive deep brain neuromodulation technology that can solve the problem of balance between focus area and stimulation depth. However, at present, the stimulation target of this technology is relatively single, and it is difficult to realize the coordinated stimulation of multiple brain regions, which limits its application in the modulation of multiple nodes in the brain network. This paper first proposes a multi-target temporal interference magnetic stimulation system with array coils. The array coils are composed of seven coil units with an outer radius of 25 mm, and the spacing between coil units is 2 mm. Secondly, models of human tissue fluid and the human brain sphere are established. Finally, the relationship between the movement of the focus area and the amplitude ratio of the difference frequency excitation sources under time interference is discussed. The results show that in the case of a ratio of 1:5, the peak position of the amplitude modulation intensity of the induced electric field has moved 45 mm; that is, the movement of the focus area is related to the amplitude ratio of the difference frequency excitation sources. The conclusion is that multi-target temporal interference magnetic stimulation with array coils can simultaneously stimulate multiple network nodes in the brain region; rough positioning can be performed by controlling the conduction of different coils, fine-tuning the position by changing the current ratio of the conduction coils, and realizing accurate stimulation of multiple targets in the brain area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingyu Wang
- School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
| | - Lele Yan
- School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
| | - Xinsheng Yang
- School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
| | - Duyan Geng
- School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
| | - Guizhi Xu
- School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
| | - Alan Wang
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
- Centre for Brain Research, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
- Centre for Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gosselink M, Hoogduin H, Froeling M, Klomp DWJ. No need to detune transmitters in 32-channel receiver arrays at 7 T. NMR Biomed 2021; 34:e4491. [PMID: 33567471 PMCID: PMC8244117 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging facilitates high spatiotemporal resolution that benefits from increasing the number of receiver elements. Because high-density receiver arrays have a relatively small element size compared with the transmitter, a side effect is that such setups cause low flux coupling between the transmitter and receiver. Moreover, when transmitters are designed in a multitransmit configuration, their relative size is much smaller than the sample, reducing coupling to the sample and thereby potentially also the coupling to the receivers. Transmitters are traditionally detuned during reception. In this study, we investigate, for a 32-channel receiver head array at 7 T, if transmitter detuning of a quadrature birdcage or of an eight-channel transmit coil can be omitted without substantially sacrificing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The transmit elements are operated once with and once without detuning and, in the latter, the received signals are either merged with the array or excluded for image reconstruction. For each of the three measurements, SNR and 1/g-factor maps are investigated. The tuning of the quadrature and eight-channel transmit coils during signal reception introduced a 10.1% and 6.5% penalty in SNR, respectively, relative to the SNR received with detuned transmitters. When also incorporating the signal of the transmit coils, the SNR was regained to 98.5% or 101.4% for the quadrature and eight-channel coil, respectively, relative to the detuned transmitters, while the 1/g-factor maps improved slightly. For the 32-channel receive coil used the SNR penalty can become negligible when omitting detuning of the transmit coils. This not only simplifies transmit coil designs, potentially increasing their efficiency, but also enables the transmitters to be used as receivers in parallel to the receiver array, thus increasing parallel imaging performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Gosselink
- Department of RadiologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Hans Hoogduin
- Department of RadiologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Martijn Froeling
- Department of RadiologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Dennis W. J. Klomp
- Department of RadiologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li M, Li Y, Jin J, Yang Z, Zhang B, Liu Y, Song M, Freakly C, Weber E, Liu F, Jiang T, Crozier S. A dedicated eight-channel receive RF coil array for monkey brain MRI at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed 2020; 33:e4369. [PMID: 32729642 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The neuroimaging of nonhuman primates (NHPs) realised with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in understanding brain structures and functions, as well as neurodegenerative diseases and pathological disorders. Theoretically, an ultrahigh field MRI (≥7 T) is capable of providing a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for better resolution; however, the lack of appropriate radiofrequency (RF) coils for 9.4 T monkey MRI undermines the benefits provided by a higher field strength. In particular, the standard volume birdcage coil at 9.4 T generates typical destructive interferences in the periphery of the brain, which reduces the SNR in the neuroscience-focused cortex region. Also, the standard birdcage coil is not capable of performing parallel imaging. Consequently, extended scan durations may cause unnecessary damage due to overlong anaesthesia. In this work, assisted by numerical simulations, an eight-channel receive RF coil array was specially designed and manufactured for imaging NHPs at 9.4 T. The structure and geometry of the proposed receive array was optimised with numerical simulations, so that the SNR enhancement region was particularly focused on monkey brain. Validated with rhesus monkey and cynomolgus monkey brain images acquired from a 9.4 T MRI scanner, the proposed receive array outperformed standard birdcage coil with higher SNR, mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy values, as well as providing better capability for parallel imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyan Li
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yu Li
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jin Jin
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Siemens Healthcare Pty. Ltd., Bowen Hills QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Zhengyi Yang
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Baogui Zhang
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yanyan Liu
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Song
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Craig Freakly
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ewald Weber
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Feng Liu
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tianzi Jiang
- Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stuart Crozier
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Robinson SD, Bredies K, Khabipova D, Dymerska B, Marques JP, Schweser F. An illustrated comparison of processing methods for MR phase imaging and QSM: combining array coil signals and phase unwrapping. NMR Biomed 2017; 30:e3601. [PMID: 27619999 PMCID: PMC5348291 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Revised: 06/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Phase imaging benefits from strong susceptibility effects at very high field and the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) afforded by multi-channel coils. Combining the information from coils is not trivial, however, as the phase that originates in local field effects (the source of interesting contrast) is modified by the inhomogeneous sensitivity of each coil. This has historically been addressed by referencing individual coil sensitivities to that of a volume coil, but alternative approaches are required for ultra-high field systems in which no such coil is available. An additional challenge in phase imaging is that the phase that develops up to the echo time is "wrapped" into a range of 2π radians. Phase wraps need to be removed in order to reveal the underlying phase distribution of interest. Beginning with a coil combination using a homogeneous reference volume coil - the Roemer approach - which can be applied at 3 T and lower field strengths, we review alternative methods for combining single-echo and multi-echo phase images where no such reference coil is available. These are applied to high-resolution data acquired at 7 T and their effectiveness assessed via an index of agreement between phase values over channels and the contrast-to-noise ratio in combined images. The virtual receiver coil and COMPOSER approaches were both found to be computationally efficient and effective. The main features of spatial and temporal phase unwrapping methods are reviewed, placing particular emphasis on recent developments in temporal phase unwrapping and Laplacian approaches. The features and performance of these are illustrated in application to simulated and high-resolution in vivo data. Temporal unwrapping was the fastest of the methods tested and the Laplacian the most robust in images with low SNR. © 2016 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Daniel Robinson
- High Field Magnetic Resonance Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Kristian Bredies
- Institute of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Austria
| | - Diana Khabipova
- Laboratory for Functional and Metabolic Imaging, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviou, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara Dymerska
- High Field Magnetic Resonance Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - José P Marques
- Laboratory for Functional and Metabolic Imaging, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviou, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ferdinand Schweser
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, New York, USA
- MRI Clinical and Translational Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wiggins GC, Brown R, Lakshmanan K. High-performance radiofrequency coils for (23)Na MRI: brain and musculoskeletal applications. NMR Biomed 2016; 29:96-106. [PMID: 26404631 PMCID: PMC4713340 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
(23)Na RF coil design for brain and MSK applications presents a number of challenges, including poor coil loading for arrays of small coils and SNR penalties associated with providing (1)H capability with the same coil. The basics of RF coil design are described, as well as a review of historical approaches to dual tuning. There follows a review of published high performance coil designs for MSK and brain imaging. Several coil designs have been demonstrated at 7T and 3T which incorporate close-fitting receive arrays and in some cases design features which provide (1)H imaging with little penalty to (23)Na sensitivity. The "nested coplanar loop" approach is examined, in which small transmit-receive (1)H elements are placed within each (23)Na loop, presenting only a small perturbation to (23)Na performance and minimizing RF shielding issues. Other designs incorporating transmit-receive arrays for (23)Na and (1)H are discussed including a 9.4 T (23)Na/(1)H brain coil. Great gains in (23)Na SNR have been made with many of these designs, but simultaneously achieving high performance for 1H remains elusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham C Wiggins
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Ryan Brown
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Karthik Lakshmanan
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Triantafyllou C, Polimeni JR, Keil B, Wald LL. Coil-to-coil physiological noise correlations and their impact on functional MRI time-series signal-to-noise ratio. Magn Reson Med 2016; 76:1708-1719. [PMID: 26756964 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Revised: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 10/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Physiological nuisance fluctuations ("physiological noise") are a major contribution to the time-series signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) of functional imaging. While thermal noise correlations between array coil elements have a well-characterized effect on the image Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR0 ), the element-to-element covariance matrix of the time-series fluctuations has not yet been analyzed. We examine this effect with a goal of ultimately improving the combination of multichannel array data. THEORY AND METHODS We extend the theoretical relationship between tSNR and SNR0 to include a time-series noise covariance matrix Ψt , distinct from the thermal noise covariance matrix Ψ0 , and compare its structure to Ψ0 and the signal coupling matrix SSH formed from the signal intensity vectors S. RESULTS Inclusion of the measured time-series noise covariance matrix into the model relating tSNR and SNR0 improves the fit of experimental multichannel data and is shown to be distinct from Ψ0 or SSH . CONCLUSION Time-series noise covariances in array coils are found to differ from Ψ0 and more surprisingly, from the signal coupling matrix SSH . Correct characterization of the time-series noise has implications for the analysis of time-series data and for improving the coil element combination process. Magn Reson Med 76:1708-1719, 2016. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan R Polimeni
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Boris Keil
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lawrence L Wald
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Janssens T, Keil B, Serano P, Mareyam A, McNab JA, Wald LL, Vanduffel W. A 22-channel receive array with Helmholtz transmit coil for anesthetized macaque MRI at 3 T. NMR Biomed 2013; 26:1431-40. [PMID: 23703859 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.2970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2013] [Revised: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 04/04/2013] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The macaque monkey is an important model for cognitive and sensory neuroscience that has been used extensively in behavioral, electrophysiological, molecular and, more recently, neuroimaging studies. However, macaque MRI has unique technical differences relative to human MRI, such as the geometry of highly parallel receive arrays, which must be addressed to optimize imaging performance. A 22-channel receive coil array was constructed specifically for rapid high-resolution anesthetized macaque monkey MRI at 3 T. A local Helmholtz transmit coil was used for excitation. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and noise amplification for parallel imaging were compared with those of single- and four-channel receive coils routinely used for macaque MRI. The 22-channel coil yielded significant improvements in SNR throughout the brain. Using this coil, the SNR in peripheral brain was 2.4 and 1.7 times greater than that obtained with single- or four-channel coils, respectively. In the central brain, the SNR gain was 1.5 times that of both the single- and four-channel coils. Finally, the performance of the array for functional, anatomical and diffusion-weighted imaging was evaluated. For all three modalities, the use of the 22-channel array allowed for high-resolution and accelerated image acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Janssens
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, K.U. Leuven Medical School, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Investigation of highly accelerated MRI has developed into a lively corner in the hardware and methodology arena in recent years. At the extreme of (one-dimensional) acceleration, our group introduced Single Echo Acquisition (SEA) imaging, in which the need to phase encode a 64×N(readout) image is eliminated and replaced with the well-localized spatial information obtained from an array of 64 very narrow, long, parallel coils. The narrow coil width (2mm) that facilitates this is accompanied by a concomitant constraint on the useful imaging depth. This note describes a 64-element planar array, constructed within the same 8×13cm total footprint as the original SEA array, still enabling full acceleration in one dimension, but with an element design modified to increase the imaging depth. This was accomplished by lowering the outer conducting legs of the planar pair with respect to the center conductor and adding a geometric decoupling configuration away from the imaging field of view. The element has been called a dual-plane pair in that the current carrying rungs in the imaging FOV function exactly as the planar pair, but are simply placed in two separate planes (sides of PCB in this case).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chieh-Wei Chang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Katherine Lynn Moody
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Mary Preston McDougall
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Triantafyllou C, Polimeni JR, Wald LL. Physiological noise and signal-to-noise ratio in fMRI with multi-channel array coils. Neuroimage 2011; 55:597-606. [PMID: 21167946 PMCID: PMC3039683 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2010] [Revised: 11/17/2010] [Accepted: 11/21/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Sensitivity in BOLD fMRI is characterized by the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the time-series (tSNR), which contains fluctuations from thermal and physiological noise sources. Alteration of an acquisition parameter can affect the tSNR differently depending on the relative magnitude of the physiological and thermal noise, therefore knowledge of this ratio is essential for optimizing fMRI acquisitions. In this study, we compare image and time-series SNR from array coils at 3T with and without parallel imaging (GRAPPA) as a function of image resolution and acceleration. We use the "absolute unit" SNR method of Kellman and McVeigh to calculate the image SNR (SNR(0)) in a way that renders it comparable to tSNR, allowing determination of the thermal to physiological noise ratio, and the pseudo-multiple replica method to quantify the image noise alterations due to the GRAPPA reconstruction. The Kruger and Glover noise model, in which the physiological noise standard deviation is proportional to signal strength, was found to hold for the accelerated and non-accelerated array coil data. Thermal noise dominated the EPI time-series for medium to large voxel sizes for single-channel and 12-channel head coil configurations, but physiological noise dominated the 32-channel array acquisition even at 1 mm × 1mm × 3 mm resolution. At higher acceleration factors, image SNR is reduced and the time-series becomes increasingly thermal noise dominant. However, the tSNR reduction is smaller than the reduction in image SNR due to the presence of physiological noise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Triantafyllou
- Athinoula A. Martinos Imaging Center at McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|