King of the castle: organisational influences on authority gradients between network controllers and other team members

The rail system relies on the effective coordination of multiple disciplines and teams situated within an operational hierarchy to meet a single operational objective-the safe and timely movement of rail traffic. Power and status dispersals across these teams and the various roles within them impact interaction and communication. This study drew on the perceptions of network controllers, to identify organisational factors influencing power imbalances that generate authority gradients between network controllers and other team members. Network controllers (N = 55) across eight Australasian organisations engaged in interviews using the Scenario Invention Task Technique to explore perceptions of risk. Thematic analysis revealed relationships between teams were affected by: (1) the accountability mechanisms adopted by organisations; (2) the way power was vested in roles; and (3) the status attached to roles. This insight into organisational power hierarchies and the generation of authority gradients provides opportunities for understanding teamwork error.Practitioner summary: Communication is impaired by authority gradients across teams in rail and is a contributing factor in incidents occurring on the network. This paper explores the organisational influences on power hierarchies across teams from the perspective of the network controller, pointing to an adversarial culture, resulting in tribalism impeding team interactions.

Why are patients not more involved in their own safety? A questionnaire-based survey in a multi-ethnic North London hospital population

PURPOSE

Active patient participation in safety pathways has demonstrated benefits in reducing preventable errors, especially in relation to hand hygiene and surgical site marking. The authors sought to examine patient participation in a range of safety-related behaviours as well as factors that influence this, such as gender, education, age and language.

DESIGN

A 20-point questionnaire was employed in a London teaching hospital to explore safety-related behaviours, particularly assessing patient's willingness to challenge healthcare professionals and engagement in taking an active role in their own care while in hospital. Data was also collected on participant demographic details including gender, age, ethnicity, English language proficiency and education status.

RESULTS

85% of the 175 patients surveyed would consider bringing a list of their medications to hospital, but only 60% would bring a list of previous surgeries. Only 45% would actively engage in the WHO Safer Surgery Checklist and over three quarters (80%) would not challenge doctors and nurses regarding hand hygiene, believing that they would cause offence. Female patients who had tertiary education, were fluent in English and less than 60 years of age were statistically more likely to feel responsible for their own safety and take an active role in safety-related behaviour while in hospital (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients are not engaged in safety-related behaviour and do not challenge healthcare professionals on safety issues. Older male patients who were not tertiary educated or fluent in English need to be empowered to take an active role in such behaviour. Further research is required to investigate how to achieve this.