Stimm J, Guenthner C, Kozerke S, Stoeck CT. Comparison of interpolation methods of predominant cardiomyocyte orientation from in vivo and ex vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging data.
NMR Biomed 2022;
35:e4667. [PMID:
34964179 PMCID:
PMC9285076 DOI:
10.1002/nbm.4667]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac electrophysiology and cardiac mechanics both depend on the average cardiomyocyte long-axis orientation. In the realm of personalized medicine, knowledge of the patient-specific changes in cardiac microstructure plays a crucial role. Patient-specific computational modelling has emerged as a tool to better understand disease progression. In vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is a vital tool to non-destructively measure the average cardiomyocyte long-axis orientation in the heart. However, cDTI suffers from long scan times, rendering volumetric, high-resolution acquisitions challenging. Consequently, interpolation techniques are needed to populate bio-mechanical models with patient-specific average cardiomyocyte long-axis orientations. In this work, we compare five interpolation techniques applied to in vivo and ex vivo porcine input data. We compare two tensor interpolation approaches, one rule-based approximation, and two data-driven, low-rank models. We demonstrate the advantage of tensor interpolation techniques, resulting in lower interpolation errors than do low-rank models and rule-based methods adapted to cDTI data. In an ex vivo comparison, we study the influence of three imaging parameters that can be traded off against acquisition time: in-plane resolution, signal to noise ratio, and number of acquired short-axis imaging slices.
Collapse