Routine Use of Neck Drains Following Thyroid Operations to Prevent Complications Is No Longer Advisable

BACKGROUND

The use of cervical drains to prevent cervical hematoma or seroma after thyroidectomy remains a controversial issue.

OBJECTIVE

Identify clinical and surgical risk factors for hematoma or seroma and evaluate the usefulness of routine use of drains following thyroid surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective multicentric study related to consecutive patients submitted to thyroid surgery in seven Portuguese hospitals between January 2018 and December 2020 (n=945). The data collected included the following parameters: age and gender of the patients, anticoagulation or anti-aggregating therapy, histological diagnoses, type of surgery, the presence or absence of postoperative drains, thyroid weight, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and reinterventions. In this study, surgical complications evaluated were limited to the presence of hematoma or seroma. A total of 945 patients who underwent thyroid surgery were included in the study. Twenty-seven patients (2.9%, n=27) experienced complications classified as hematomas or seromas. In the series, significant differences were observed between the two groups according to hypocoagulation or anti-aggregation status (OR=3.62; 95% CI 1.14-11.4) (p=0.001) and the nature of histological diagnosis (toxic vs. non-toxic benign disease) (OR=6.59; 95% CI 1.83-23.7). Hypocoagulation or anti-aggregation status were independently associated with a higher risk of complications. The presence of drains was associated with longer hospitalization periods (p<0.001) and not a decreased need for reintervention.

CONCLUSION

Cervical hematoma or seroma are rare complications associated with both hypocoagulation and anti-aggregation therapy and with the presence of benign toxic pathology. The use of drains does not decrease the need for reintervention and is even associated with a longer length of hospital stay; therefore, their routine use should not be advised.

Case report: Drainage tube penetrating anastomosis as a rare cause for long-term nonunion of esophagogastric anastomosis in neck

Anastomotic leakage is a life-threatening complication for esophageal cancer patients who received McKeown esophagectomy. Cervical drainage tube penetrating anastomosis is a rare but noteworthy cause of long-term nonunion of esophagogastric anastomosis. Here we reported two cases of esophageal cancer patients who received McKeown esophagectomy. The first case acquired the anastomotic leakage on postoperative day (POD) 7, and lasted for 56 days. The cervical drainage tube was removed at POD 38, and the leakage healed in 25 days. The second case acquired the anastomotic leakage on POD 8 and lasted for 95 days. The cervical drainage tube was removed at POD 57, and the leakage healed in 46 days. The two cases demonstrated the duration-prolonging effect of drainage tube penetrating anastomosis, which should not be overlooked in clinical practice. We suggested paying attention to the duration of leakage, the drainage fluids amounts and characteristics, and the imaging manifestations to help diagnose. If the cervical drainage tube penetrated the anastomosis, the tube should be eliminated as soon.