Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia and confronting amputation: A Heideggerian derived understanding of Being-with and discourse

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the notion of Being-with and authentic discourse for people making decisions about major amputation.

BACKGROUND

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia is a devastating disease with a high burden of pain and complex wounds. Patients may deteriorate suddenly after multiple revascularisation procedures and, amputation is offered when further reperfusion is considered futile. Delayed decisions about amputation have negative consequences for patients, families and health systems, yet little attention is given to training clinicians for the sophisticated communication required. Clinicians need to engage in authentic discourse about amputation to create shared meaning and facilitate decision-making.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using hermeneutic Heideggerian phenomenology.

METHODS

Twelve patients offered major amputation, and 13 family participants from three vascular units in Australia engaged in 42 semi-structured interviews, representing 19 cases of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. Hermeneutic phenomenology using the Heideggerian tenet of Being-with as an analytic framework, a philosophically based understanding of Being-with and Discourse related to treatment discussions and decisions was derived. The research was reported in accordance with the COREQ checklist.

FINDINGS

Effective discourse between the person and family was hampered by changed circumstances of Being-with, characterised by guilt, and a retreat from discourse through deficient discourse and filtering information. Clinician Being-with was hampered by discourse that was deficient, poorly delivered, discordant and disconnected through a lack of empathetic listening. There were also examples of enhanced clinician Being-with that made room for more constructive discourse and more timely decisions about amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Heidegger's construct of Being-with provides a useful framework to reveal the role of authentic discourse in improving patient and family experience and decisions about treatment.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study did not engage consumers other than as patient and carer participants.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Decisions about amputation are often difficult for patients or family members who may be substitute decision-makers. A better understanding of the experience may assist clinicians in their interactions with patients and families.

What is clinician presence? A qualitative interview study comparing physician and non-physician insights about practices of human connection

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the concept and practices of 'clinician presence', exploring how physicians and professionals create connection, engage in interpersonal interaction, and build trust with individuals across different circumstances and contexts.

DESIGN

In 2017-2018, we conducted qualitative semistructured interviews with 10 physicians and 30 non-medical professionals from the fields of protective services, business, management, education, art/design/entertainment, social services, and legal/personal services.

SETTING

Physicians were recruited from primary care clinics in an academic medical centre, a Veterans Affairs clinic, and a federally qualified health centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 55% men and 45% women; 40% were non-white.

RESULTS

Qualitative analyses yielded a definition of presence as a purposeful practice of awareness, focus, and attention with the intent to understand and connect with individuals/patients. For both medical and non-medical professionals, creating presence requires managing and considering time and environmental factors; for physicians in particular, this includes managing and integrating technology. Listening was described as central to creating the state of being present. Within a clinic, presence might manifest as a physician listening without interrupting, focusing intentionally on the patient, taking brief re-centering breaks throughout a clinic day, and informing patients when attention must be redirected to administrative or technological demands.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinician presence involves learning to step back, pause, and be prepared to receive a patient's story. Building on strategies from physicians and non-medical professionals, clinician presence is best enacted through purposeful intention to connect, conscious navigation of time, and proactive management of technology and the environment to focus attention on the patient. Everyday practice or ritual supporting these strategies could support physician self-care as well as physician-patient connection.