Modified Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics: Treating Children With Tic Disorders, Co-Occurring ADHD, and Psychosocial Impairment

Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a modified comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics (MCBIT) therapy for youth with chronic tic disorders (CTDs), co-occurring attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and associated psychosocial impairment. Seventeen youth ages 10-17 with CTD and co-occurring ADHD were randomly assigned to the MCBIT group (n = 9) or to a control group where they received traditional comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics (CBIT) therapy (n = 8). Both groups received ten 55-minute weekly treatment sessions, and two 55-minute biweekly relapse prevention sessions. Sixteen of the 17 participants completed the study, and acceptability ratings in both treatment groups were high with no significant differences in expectation of improvement. The MCBIT and CBIT groups in combination showed significant improvement in tic severity, ADHD symptom severity, and tic-related impairment. Group differences were not significant. The results indicate that MCBIT treatment is feasible and acceptable for youth with CTD and ADHD, and is similarly well tolerated relative to traditional CBIT. Results were not sufficiently superior to recommend MCBIT over CBIT for this population. However, given the demonstrated benefit of behavioral treatments that target co-occurring conditions concurrently, continuing to examine novel behavioral approaches that can target tics and related conditions simultaneously and successfully is recommended.

A preliminary study of comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics in Chinese children with chronic tic disorder or Tourette syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the adaptability of Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) for a Chinese population, and evaluate the efficacy of combined CBIT and pharmacotherapy (CBIT + PT) compared to CBIT or pharmacotherapy (PT) alone for reducing tics and for improving the quality of life (QoL) in a sample of Chinese children with chronic tic disorders (CTD) and Tourette syndrome (TS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this 10-week randomized controlled pilot trial, 37 outpatients aged between 6 and 16 years affected by TS and CTD were randomly assigned to receive CBIT (n = 22) or PT alone (n = 15). Considering the feasibility, the patients allocated to the CBIT treatment group could further choose whether to simultaneously take medicine voluntarily, resulting in a CBIT alone group (n = 12) and a CBIT + PT group (n = 10).

RESULTS

At baseline, no significant difference was found between the three groups in the demographic and clinical characteristics (p > 0.05). All three groups showed a significant reduction in tic severity after treatment assessed by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) severity score [F ₍₂,₃₃₎ = 35.05, p < 0.001, η _p ² = 0.51], the score of the Clinical Global Impression scale for Improvement (CGI-I) [F ₍₁,₃₄₎ = 13.87, p = 0.001, η _p ² = 0.29], and YGTSS impairment score [F ₍₂,₃₃₎ = 31.71, p < 0.001, η _p ² = 0.48]. Significant interactions were found between the time-point and group in emotional functioning [F ₍₂,₂₉₎ = 4.39, p = 0.02, η _p ² = 0.23], psychosocial functioning [F ₍₂,₂₉₎ = 5.93, p = 0.007, η _p ² = 0.29], and total QoL score [F ₍₁,₃₄₎ = 3.72, p = 0.04, η _p ² = 0.20] of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0) for children suggesting a significantly larger improvement in emotional functioning, psychosocial functioning, and total QoL score of the life quality in the CBIT group for children self-report. PedsQL for proxy report only showed a significant main effect of time-point in physical functioning [F ₍₁,₃₃₎ = 8.35, p = 0.01, η _p ² = 0.2], emotional functioning [F ₍₁,₃₃₎ = 10.75, p = 0.002, η _p ² = 0.25], psychosocial functioning [F ₍₁,₃₄₎ = 11.38, p = 0.002, η _p ² = 0.26], and total Qol score [F ₍₁,₃₄₎ = 13.21, p = 0.001, η _p ² = 0.29].

CONCLUSION

CBIT is probably effective in reducing tic severity in Chinese children with tic disorders. CBIT + PT may not be superior to CBIT alone in reducing tic severity and improving quality of life. CBIT alone showed advantages in improving quality of life over CBIT + PT and PT alone. CBIT might be an appropriate treatment option for patients with tic disorder in Chinese mainland.