1
|
Moretto R, Germani MM, Borelli B, Conca V, Rossini D, Boraschi P, Donati F, Urbani L, Lonardi S, Bergamo F, Cerma K, Ramondo G, D'Amico FE, Salvatore L, Valente G, Barbaro B, Giuliante F, Di Maio M, Masi G, Cremolini C. Predicting early recurrence after resection of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: the role of baseline and pre-surgery clinical, radiological and molecular factors in a real-life multicentre experience. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102991. [PMID: 38631269 PMCID: PMC11027482 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in surgical techniques and systemic treatments have increased the likelihood of achieving radical surgery and long-term survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Nonetheless, roughly half of the patients resected after an upfront systemic therapy experience disease relapse within 6 months from surgery, thus leading to the question whether surgery is actually beneficial for these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A real-world dataset of mCRC patients with initially unresectable liver-limited disease treated with conversion chemotherapy followed by radical resection of CRLMs at three high-volume Italian institutions was retrospectively assessed with the aim of investigating the association of baseline and pre-surgical clinical, radiological and molecular factors with the risk of relapse within 6 or 12 months from surgery. RESULTS Overall, 268 patients were included in the analysis and 207 (77%) experienced recurrence. Ninety-six (46%) of them had disease relapse within 6 months after CRLM resection and in spite of several variables associated with early recurrence at univariate analyses, only primary tumour resection at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.89, P = 0.02] remained significant in the multivariable model. Among patients with resected primary tumours, pN+ stage was associated with higher risk of disease relapse within 6 months (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.23-7.41, P = 0.02). One hundred and forty-nine patients (72%) had disease relapse within 12 months after CRLMs resection but none of the analysed variables was independently associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS Clinical, radiological and molecular factors assessed before and after conversion chemotherapy do not reliably predict early recurrence after secondary resection of initially unresectable CRLMs. While novel markers are needed to optimize the cost/efficacy balance of surgical procedures, CRLM resection should be offered as soon as metastases become resectable during first-line chemotherapy to all patients eligible for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Moretto
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa
| | - M M Germani
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - B Borelli
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - V Conca
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - D Rossini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Pisa
| | - P Boraschi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa
| | - F Donati
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa
| | - L Urbani
- General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa
| | - S Lonardi
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua
| | - F Bergamo
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua
| | - K Cerma
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua
| | - G Ramondo
- Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua
| | - F E D'Amico
- General Surgery 2, Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua
| | - L Salvatore
- Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
| | - G Valente
- Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
| | - B Barbaro
- Diagnostic and General Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome
| | - F Giuliante
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome
| | - M Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - G Masi
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - C Cremolini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li ZK, Liu J, Chen C, Yang KY, Deng YT, Jiang Y. Locally advanced malignant solitary fibrous tumour successfully treated with conversion chemotherapy, operation and postoperative radiotherapy: a case report. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:300060521996940. [PMID: 33719644 PMCID: PMC7952856 DOI: 10.1177/0300060521996940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Preoperative diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) may not provide a complete tumour picture and may be inaccurate. There is no standard treatment for locally advanced or metastasised malignant SFT (MSFT). Here, the case of a 17-year-old male patient with final pathology diagnosis of MSFT is reported. Preoperative biopsy pathology results suggested an Ewing sarcoma that was positive for CD99 antigen, vimentin, friend leukaemia integration 1 transcription factor, apoptosis regulator Bcl-2, and synaptophysin; and negative for CD34 antigen, S-100 protein (S-100), smooth muscle antigen, cytokeratin, and Wilms tumour 1 associated protein. The Ki67 positive rate was 8%, so the patient initially received eight cycles of conversion chemotherapy (vincristine, etoposide, ifosfamide and pirarubicin for one cycle, and vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide and etoposide for 7 cycles in total). The tumour shrunk significantly and was surgically removed. The final pathology diagnosis was MSFT that was positive for CD99 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6, and negative for CD34, tumour protein 63, S-100, desmin, and epithelial membrane antigen. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed no gene translocation in EWS RNA binding protein 1, SS18 subunit of BAF chromatin remodelling complex or FUS RNA binding protein. The patient finally accepted adjuvant radiotherapy of 5600 cGy. Disease-free survival has been > 1 year, with no recurrence or metastasis detected to date. MSFT is rare and treatment for locally advanced or metastatic MSFT remains controversial. The efficacy of the present therapeutic strategy requires further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Ke Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ke-Yi Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yao-Tiao Deng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Symonds LK, Cohen SA. Use of perioperative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2019; 7:301-311. [PMID: 31687149 PMCID: PMC6821343 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goz035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A curative-intent approach may improve survival in carefully selected patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer. Aggressive treatments are most frequently administered to patients with isolated liver metastasis, though they may be judiciously considered for other sites of metastasis. To be considered for curative intent with surgery, patients must have disease that can be definitively treated while leaving a sufficient functional liver remnant. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be used for upfront resectable disease as a test of tumor biology and/or for upfront unresectable disease to increase the likelihood of resectability (so-called 'conversion' chemotherapy). While conversion chemotherapy in this setting aims to improve survival, the choice of a regimen remains a complex and highly individualized decision. In this review, we discuss the role of RAS status, primary site, sidedness, and other clinical features that affect chemotherapy treatment selection as well as key factors of patients that guide individualized patient-treatment recommendations for colorectal-cancer patients being considered for definitive treatment with metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn K Symonds
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stacey A Cohen
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Homayounfar K, Bleckmann A, Conradi LC, Sprenger T, Lorf T, Niessner M, Sahlmann CO, Meller J, Liersch T, Ghadimi BM. Metastatic recurrence after complete resection of colorectal liver metastases: impact of surgery and chemotherapy on survival. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28:1009-17. [PMID: 23371333 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1648-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgery is the standard of care for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRC-LM). Unfortunately, 60% of patients develop secondary metastatic recurrence (SMR) after R0-resection of CRC-LM. We investigated the impact of surgical re-intervention and chemotherapy (Ctx) on survival in a consecutive series of patients with SMR. METHODS From 01/2001 to 11/2011, 104 out of 178 consecutive patients with R0-resection of CRC-LM developed SMR and were evaluated. The impact of surgical and Ctx re-interventions on recurrence free (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed. Median follow-up was 28.0 (95%CI: 19.4-37.4) months. RESULTS SMR occurred in 81 patients at a single site (49× liver, 18× lung, 14× other) and in 23 patients at multiple sites. Forty-two patients were scheduled for primary surgery. Fifty-three patients were classified as non-resectable and treated with median 5.0 [IQR, 3.0-10.0] cycles of Ctx, combined with an EGFR/VEGF-antibody in 27 patients. Nine patients received best supportive care only. R0/R1 resection could be achieved in 35 patients primarily and even in 8 patients secondarily after Ctx. Surgical morbidity and mortality were 16 and 0%, respectively. The 5-year RFS rates for patients with R0 versus R1-resection were 22 and 24% (p = 0.948). The 5-year CSS rate for R0/R1-resected patients was 38% versus 10% for those patients treated by Ctx alone (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In SMR, surgical re-intervention is feasible and safe in a remarkable number of patients and offers significantly longer CSS compared to patients without resection.
Collapse
|