1
|
Zhu L, Wang Z, Huang Z, Yang X, Yu Z, Cao R, Chen Y. Efficacy and safety of covered versus uncovered self‑expandable metal stents for the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary stricture: A long‑term retrospective study. Exp Ther Med 2023; 25:297. [PMID: 37229325 PMCID: PMC10203749 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2023.11996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Both covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMSs) have been tried in the palliation of malignant distal biliary strictures by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, the comparison of efficacy and safety between them remains contested. To the best of our knowledge, no similar studies have assessed this in the Chinese population. In the present study, the clinical and endoscopic data of 238 patients (CSEMSs, n=55; USEMSs, n=183) with malignant distal biliary strictures from 2014 to 2019 were collected. The efficacy indicated by mean stent patency, stent patency rate, mean patient survival time and survival rate, and the safety indicated by adverse events after CSEMS or USEMS placement were retrospectively analyzed and compared. The mean stent patency time was significantly longer in the CSEMSs group than that in the USEMSs group (262.8±195.3 days vs. 169.5±155.7 days, P=0.002). The mean patient survival time was significantly longer in the CSEMSs group than that in the USEMSs group (273.9±197.6 days vs. 184.9±167.6 days, P=0.003). The stent patency rate and patient survival rate were significantly higher in the CSEMSs group than those in the USEMSs group at 6 and 12 months, but not at 1 and 3 months. There was no significant difference in stent dysfunction and adverse events between the two groups, although post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurred more frequently in the CSEMSs group than in the USEMSs group (18.1% vs. 8.8%, P=0.049). In conclusion, CSEMSs were better than USEMSs for malignant distal biliary strictures in terms of stent patency time and patient survival time as well as stent patency rate and patient survival rate in the long term (>6 months). Adverse events in the two groups occurred at a similar rate, although the incidence of PEP was higher in the CSEMSs group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
- Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| | - Zhenwen Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| | - Zhiquan Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| | - Xueping Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| | - Zhengping Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| | - Ronglai Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| | - Youxiang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
- Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tanisaka Y, Mizuide M, Fujita A, Ogawa T, Katsuda H, Saito Y, Miyaguchi K, Jinushi R, Terada R, Nakano Y, Tashima T, Mashimo Y, Ryozawa S. Current Status of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Patients with Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10194619. [PMID: 34640637 PMCID: PMC8509542 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10194619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Distal malignant biliary obstruction is caused by various malignant diseases that require biliary drainage. In patients with operable situations, preoperative biliary drainage is required to control jaundice and cholangitis until surgery. In view of tract seeding, endoscopic biliary drainage is the first choice. Since neoadjuvant therapies are being developed, the time to surgery is increasing, especially in pancreatic cancer cases. Therefore, it requires long stent patency. Recently, preoperative biliary drainage using self-expandable metal stents has been reported as a useful modality to secure long stent patency. In patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction, self-expandable metal stent is the first choice for maintaining long stent patency. Although there are many comparison studies between a covered and an uncovered self-expandable metal stent, their use is still controversial. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage has been performed as an alternative treatment. The clinical success and stent patency are favorable. We should take into consideration that both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage have advantages and disadvantages and chose the drainage method depending on the patient’s situation or the expertise of the endoscopist. Here, we discuss the current status of endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction.
Collapse
|