Treatment of Long-Haul COVID Patients With Off-Label Acyclovir

The SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) became a global pandemic in March 2020. This novel, highly infectious virus caused millions of infections and deaths around the world. Currently, there are few medications that are available for the treatment of COVID-19. Those affected are most commonly given supportive care, with some experiencing symptoms for months. We report a series of four cases depicting the successful use of acyclovir in the treatment of the virus SARS-CoV-2 in patients with long-haul symptoms, especially those in the realm of encephalopathy and neurological problems. Treatment with acyclovir in these patients resolved their symptoms and lowered their IgG and IgM titers, supporting the use of acyclovir as a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19 neurologic symptoms. We suggest the use of the antiviral medication, acyclovir, as a treatment for patients with long-term symptoms and unusual presentations of the virus, such as encephalopathy or coagulopathy.

Corona With Lyme: A Long COVID Case Study

The longevity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated continued discussion about the long-term impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many who develop an acute COVID-19 infection will later face a constellation of enduring symptoms of varying severity, otherwise known as long COVID. As the pandemic reaches its inevitable endemicity, the long COVID patient population will undoubtedly grow and require improved recognition and management. The case presented describes the three-year arc of a previously healthy 26-year-old female medical student from initial infection and induction of long COVID symptomology to near-total remission of the disease. In doing so, the course of this unique post-viral illness and the trials and errors of myriad treatment options will be chronologized, thereby contributing to the continued demand for understanding this mystifying disease.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 on Provision of Medical Care to Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease and the Practice of Rheumatology

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had a significant impact on the healthcare field that resulted in changes to the way safe and effective medical care is delivered. The effects range from service disruption including ambulatory clinic closure due to both patient and provider concerns, to lack of capacity in hospital services. In rheumatology, there were other effects including viral infection-related autoantibody production, concerns about the use of systemic immunosuppression in the presence of an infectious pandemic and even concerns for viral infection-induced flares of rheumatic disease. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to the rapid adoption of innovative technologies that permitted the introduction and increased use of telemedicine via a number of platforms. Rapid discoveries and innovations led to the development of diagnostic and therapeutic agents in the management of COVID-19. Scientific advancement and discoveries around COVID-19 infection, symptoms, autoantibody production, chronic sequela and the repurposing of rheumatic immunosuppressive agents led to improved survival and an expanded role for the rheumatologist. Rheumatologists may sometimes be involved in the diagnosis and management of the hospitalized COVID-19 patient. In the ambulatory clinic, a rheumatologist also helps to differentiate between symptoms of long COVID and those of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). Rheumatologists must also grapple with the concerns related to immunosuppressive therapy and the risk of COVID-19 infections. In addition, there are concerns around vaccine effectiveness in people with SARD and those on immunosuppressive medications. Although the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the effects on healthcare resulted in difficulties, both patients and providers have risen to the challenge. The long-term outcome of COVID-19 for the medical system and rheumatologists in particular is not yet fully understood and will need further study. This review concentrates on the changing role of the rheumatologists, improved understanding of rheumatic disease and immunosuppressive therapies in the wake of the pandemic and how this has led to an improvement in the care of patients with COVID-19.

Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Do Indians Fare Better?

INTRODUCTION

The uplift of SARS-CoV-2 infection has necessitated the understanding of long-term consequences in the affected population. This study was driven by a lack of Indian studies to estimate the torment of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms and the quality of life.

METHODS

 This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care centre in South India, between August and November 2020. SARS-CoV-2 hospitalised patients were telephonically questioned regarding the persistence of symptoms along with an assessment of the quality of life using the 15D questionnaire in the first, second, and fourth weeks. Since a majority of the patients had resolution of symptoms by four weeks, the study was not extended for a longer period.

RESULTS

The study included 476 patients whose mean length of hospital stay was 7.67 days. Of the patients, 68.7% had mild severity, 24.8% had moderate disease, and 6.5% had severe disease. About 28.4% required oxygen, 8.2% required ICU care, and 1.3% required mechanical ventilation. Myalgia (13.9%), cough (1.3%), and dyspnoea (6.1%) were the predominant persistent symptoms in the fourth-week post-discharge. All the symptoms of health-related quality of life and physical performance improved by the fourth week, which was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our study findings are in stark contrast to the studies published from other regions of the world, which show a significant worsening of quality of life even among those with mild illness.

Management of Long-COVID Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome With Enhanced External Counterpulsation

A growing number of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 disease have been reported to have postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) after the acute phase. A 57-year-old female was diagnosed with COVID-19 in December 2020. As a result of her acute illness, she was hospitalized for COVID pneumonia and respiratory failure, followed by stays at an acute care facility and home rehabilitation center. After the acute phase, the patient was diagnosed with long-COVID-19-associated POTS with symptoms such as fatigue, “brain fog,” and dyspnea. The patient was referred to an enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) treatment center and underwent 15, one-hour sessions over three weeks. Upon completion of therapy, the patient reported improvements with “brain fog” and the ability to perform activities of daily living. Her Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue score was reduced by three points, six-minute walk distance increased by 85 feet, and Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) improved by over 15 points. EECP therapy was chosen due to the overlap in underlying pathology driving POTS and the mechanisms of action of EECP. This report is the first case of using EECP for the successful management of COVID-19-associated POTS and warrants further trials.