Long-Term Outcomes of BMMSC Compared with BMMNC for Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia and Foot Ulcer in Patients with Diabetes

We first compared long-term clinical outcomes in treating critical limb ischemia (CLI) and foot ulcer in patients with diabetes between autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMMSC) and bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cell (BMMNC) transplants. Forty-one patients were enrolled and followed up for 3 years. They received an 18-day standard treatment before stem cell transplantation. Patients with bilateral CLI and foot ulcer were injected intramuscularly or basally with BMMSC, BMMNC, or normal saline (NS). Cox model analysis showed significant differences in the hazard ratio (HR) for amputation with treatment by BMMSC (HR 0.21 [95% CI (0.05, 0.95)], P = 0.043), infection of foot (HR 5.30 [95% CI (1.89, 14.92)], P = 0.002), and age ≥64 (HR 3.01 [95% CI (1.11, 8.15)], P = 0.030), but no significant differences by BMMNC at 9 months after transplantation. Regarding ulcer healing and recurrence rate, the BMMSC group demonstrated a significant difference from the NS group during the 3-6 months after transplantation or healing, but the BMMNC group did not. This trial suggests that, compared with BMMNC treatment, BMMSC treatment leads to a longer time of limb salvage and blood flow improvement, and, when compared with conventional therapy, it can promote limb blood flow and ulcerative healing, and reduce ulcer recurrence and amputation within 9 months.

Trimodal rescue of hind limb ischemia with growth factors, cells, and nanocarriers: fundamentals to clinical trials

Peripheral artery disease is a severe medical condition commonly characterized by critical or acute limb ischemia. Gradual accumulation of thrombotic plaques in peripheral arteries of the lower limb may lead to intermittent claudication or ischemia in muscle tissue. Ischemic muscle tissue with lesions may become infected, resulting in a non-healing wound. Stable progression of the non-healing wound associated with severe ischemia might lead to functional deterioration of the limb, which, depending on the severity, can result in amputation. Immediate rescue of ischemic muscles through revascularization strategies is considered the gold standard to treat critical limb ischemia. Growth factors offer multiple levels of protection in revascularization of ischemic tissue. In this review, the basic mechanism through which growth factors exert their beneficial properties to rescue the ischemic limb is extensively discussed. Moreover, clinical trials based on growth factor and stem cell therapy to treat critical limb ischemia are considered. The clinical utility of stem cell therapy for the treatment of limb ischemia is explained and recent advances in nanocarrier technology for selective growth factor and stem cell supplementation are summarized.