[The Trend in Places of Death Over Two Decades in the City of Muenster - an Observational Study Based on evaluated Death Certificates]

Aim of the study The study examined the distribution of places of death in the Westphalian city of Muenster over an observation period of 20 years.Methods All death certificates issued in the city of Muenster from 2001, 2011, 2017, 2021 were evaluated by places of death (home (HO), hospital (HT), hospice (HP), nursing home (NH), other place (OP)). For hospital patients, deaths on intensive care units (ICU) and palliative care units (PAL) were also considered separately. Any medical information on cause of death was used to identify decedents with malignant tumor or dementia disease.Results A total of 14,240 death certificates were evaluated. A malignant tumor disease was documented in 34.0%, dementia in 11.1%. For the general population, the distribution of places of death was as follows (2001/2021; %): HO (24.0/14.6); HT (63.2/60.2) [ICU (13.3/24.6), PAL (0.0/10.9)], HP (3.8/4.9), NH (7.8/19.5), OP (1.1/0.7). Most tumor patients died in hospital (2021: 60.6%), fewer patients at home (2021: 15.4%). From 2001 to 2021, the proportion of cancer patients who died in a PAL increased significantly (+24.4%); hospices showed a moderate increase (+5.0%). A majority of dementia patients died in nursing homes (2021: 66.6%) and fewer patients at home (2021: 12.2%).Conclusion For the general population and for tumor patients, the hospital is the most common place of death and the nursing home for patients with dementia. Overall, deaths at home decreased continuously over time. For tumor patients, palliative care units and hospices are becoming increasingly important as places of death, and for dementia patients, nursing homes in particular.

[Can nursing home placement of people with dementia be delayed by case management? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials]

BACKGROUND

Dementia is one of the main reasons for care dependency in old age. Demographic changes will lead to decreased formal and informal care potential in Germany. The promotion of structured home care arrangements therefore becomes increasingly significant. The concept of case management (CM) aims at the efficient coordination of health care services based on the needs and resources of patients with chronic health issues and their caregivers. The objective of this review was to evaluate current studies on the effectiveness of outpatient CM approaches on delaying long-term care placement or reducing the risk of long-term care placement in people with dementia.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Relevant electronic databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, CENTRAL, Gerolit, ALOIS) were systematically searched. Reporting and study quality was assessed using the CONSORT checklist and Jadad scale.

RESULTS

The search strategies identified 6 RCTs relating to 5 different health care systems (Germany, USA, Netherlands, France, China). Three of the RCTs showed significant delays of long-term care placements and/or significantly reduced rates of long-term care placement in favor of the intervention groups.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes suggest that CM approaches have the potential of promoting the length of time that people with dementia remain in their own domestic environments. Further establishment and evaluation of CM approaches should therefore be strongly encouraged on the part of healthcare decision-makers. When planning and evaluating CM approaches, specific barriers, and resources for the sustainable implementation of CM in existing care chains should be assessed and taken into account.

[Telemedicine Care of Dementia Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic]

In our multidisciplinary memory center at Jena University Hospital, we initiated a regular video consultation for patients at risk of developing dementia or with dementia disease and their relatives at the beginning of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic in spring 2020.Over a 12-month period, we conducted a systematic survey of satisfaction among patients in regular face-to-face contact (F2F) and video consultations (VC).The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential use of telemedicine in older people with incipient cognitive deficits in the context of dementia. In particular, we aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and feasibility.Initial presentations to our memory center for suspected dementia were evaluated in a standardized regular on-site setting (n=50) and in a standardized video consultation (n=40). In both settings, a neuropsychologist's and a physician's consultation were performed consecutively. Both groups were similarly distributed in terms of age and sex (71.4 vs. 72.3 years, 52 vs. 50% female (F2F vs. VC)). Cognitive status was slightly better in the VC group (ACE III significant, MMST not significant).In the survey of the patients using a 12-question inventory (patient satisfaction, rated 1 to 5), there was no significant difference between the two groups overall. However, the F2F tended to be rated slightly better here in terms of advice. More than 80% of the physicians and neuropsychologists rated the technical process of VC as good/very good.A general assessment of the cognitive deficits by physicians and neuropsychologists correlated extremely highly with the results of the subsequent specific testing (MMST and ACE) in F2F and VC. With a tendency to better agreement in VC, the difference between the correlations was not significant.Overall, we could not find any significant differences in patients' satisfaction between VC and classical F2F presentation. Technical aspects in the preparation of a VC and during a VC were less problematic than initially anticipated.

[Regional Health Care Networks in Germany: Characteristics and Financing Illustrated with Dementia Care Networks]

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics, financing structures and challenges of regional dementia care networks and the use of regional financial network support according to § 45c para. 9 SGB XI.

METHODS

The analysis was based on data from 120 dementia networks that provided information on the network characteristics (location, year of foundation, goals, organizational, personnel and financing structure), the challenges and the use of regional network funding according to § 45c Para. 9 SGB XI. Differences in the organizational, personnel and financing structure depending on the network characteristics were analyzed using t-Tests and ANOVA tests. The use of regional network funding (§ 45c Para. 9) were presented descriptively and discussed against the background of the planned amendment for 2022.

RESULTS

The majority of networks were established between 2011 and 2015. Most networks had educational and care goals and, on average, 28 stakeholders. Medically-associated and longer-established networks and networks with a legal form had significantly more network partners, persons actively involved in the work of the network and funding sources. The linking of stakeholders and the funding were seen as the most significant challenges. Every tenth network received regional network funding (§45c para. 9) but 28% decided not to receive funding. For most networks (50%), the funding was still unknown.

CONCLUSION

Regional dementia networks are very heterogeneously structured. Certain factors can significantly affect the number of partners and funding sources and should, therefore, be considered. Up to now, only one network per region could receive the maximum amount (€20,000) of funding according to §45c para. 9, which limits the usability of this funding, especially in densely populated regions. The amendment now increases the number of networks to be funded within one region and the funding level. It remains to be seen to what extent this amendment will increase the use of the regional network funding.