Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study

AIM

This study set out to compare the damage done to dentin by three distinct titanium file brands - the Hyflex EDM, the ProTaper Next, and the Waveone Gold Nickel - in order to draw conclusions about which one is the most effective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-first premolars in the mandible with straight canals and single roots were instrumented using Hyflex EDM, Waveone Gold, and Protaper Next. Dentinal flaws after endodontic treatment were studied by sectioning specimens using a hard tissue microtome and analyzing them under a stereomicroscope.

RESULTS

There was no discernible variation between the groups in the coronal third (p=0.312) or apical third (p=0.076). Hyflex EDM and Protaper Next differed significantly in the middle portion of the tape (p=0.016). The Hyflex EDM sample had the fewest cracks. There was no statistically significant difference between Hyflex EDM and Waveone Gold; however, Hyflex EDM had fewer fractures in the middle third of the sample than Waveone Gold did.

CONCLUSION

Electric discharge machining (EDM) files made from Hyflex proved to be far superior to their Protaper Next and Waveone Gold counterparts as they induced the fewest cracks in the middle third of the root dentin.

Micro-computed tomography assessment of dentinal microcracks after the preparation of curved root canals with rotary and reciprocal systems

BACKGROUND

Root canal preparation with nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments may lead to the formation of microcracks in the root canal wall. Vertical root fractures may initiate from dentinal cracks, and eventually necessitate tooth extraction.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the effect of the instrumentation of curved root canals of mandibular molars with the 2Shape (2S) sequential rotary, EdgeFile® X1 (EFX1) reciprocating and NeoNiTi (NN) rotational single-file systems on the formation of dentinal microcracks with the use of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty curved mandibular molar root canals were instrumented with the 2S, EFX1 and NN systems (10 in each group). The teeth underwent micro-CT before and after instrumentation. Next, the pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation cross-sectional images were evaluated and compared for the detection of dentinal microcracks. The number of microcracks in each group was calculated and reported as percentage. The data was analyzed using the McNemar's test with the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software, v. 25.0 (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Out of the 29,280 cross-sectional images evaluated in this study, 11.5% showed dentinal microcracks (n = 3,362). On the post-instrumentation images, the frequency percentage of microcracks was 12.0% (n = 585) in the 2S group, 8.8% (n = 402) in the EFX1 group and 13.3% (n = 694) in the NN group. All of the microcracks detected on the post-instrumentation images were also present on the preinstrumentation images and no new microcracks were formed after root canal instrumentation with the aforementioned systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Root canal instrumentation with the 2S, EFX1 and NN systems did not result in the formation of new dentinal microcracks.

Periapical microsurgery: the effect of root dentinal defects on short- and long-term outcome

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of endodontic microsurgery on roots exhibiting the presence or absence of dentinal defects at 1-year and 3-year follow-up period.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-five teeth were treated with periapical microsurgery using a modern microsurgical protocol in a private practice setting. The root apices were resected and inspected for dentinal defects with a surgical operating microscope and a 0.8-mm head diameter light-emitting diode microscope diagnostic probe light. After inspection, root-end preparations were performed using ultrasonic tips, and root-end fillings were placed. Follow-up visits occurred at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure used was the change in the radiographic apical bone density, and the secondary outcome measure used was the absence of clinical symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 155 treated teeth, a total of 134 teeth were assessed at the 1-year follow-up and 127 teeth at the 3-year evaluation. In the "intact" group, 94.8% healed at 1 year, and 97.3% healed at 3 years. In the "dentinal defect" group, 29.8% healed at 1 year, and 31.5% healed at 3 years. The baseline root condition of either "dentinal defect" or "intact" showed a statistical difference in the healing outcome at both 1 and 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective periapical microsurgery study showed a significant superior clinical outcome for intact roots when compared with roots with dentinal defects at both 1 year and at 3 years postoperatively.