Are Biodegradable Calcium Sulfate Antibiotic Beads Effective and Safe Adjuvants for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis?

INTRODUCTION

 Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a highly morbid condition that commonly affects diabetic patients. Biodegradable calcium-sulfate antibiotic beads (CaSO4) are theoretical adjuvant agents to reduce morbidity in DFO. However, there is a paucity of research on the safety and effectiveness of CaSO4 beads in DFO. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of CaSO4 beads in different DFO locations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2022 of patients with DFO who underwent surgical intervention and adjuvant CaSO4 beads placement. The location of DFO was determined based on the forefoot, midfoot, or hindfoot locations. Outcomes measured were ulcer-free time points of three and six months as well as recurrence of DFO at 12 months. Safety was also evaluated with incidences of acute kidney injury, wound drainage, and hypercalcemia.

RESULTS

Forty-five cases were included. Of these, only 9/45 (20%) and 13/45 (29%) were ulcer-free at three months and six months, respectively. DFO recurred in 19/45 (42%) patients. Safety outcomes were significant for wound drainage (62%) and acute kidney injury (9%). Stratifying according to the location of DFO showed no statistically significant difference in outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort study, adjuvant CaSO4 beads showed high rates of ulcer persistence and DFO recurrence. Given the limited benefits seen here and the potential for high rates of wound drainage, the use of adjuvant CaSO4 beads should be used cautiously until a multicenter randomized clinical trial is conducted to definitely evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CaSO4 beads in DFO.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care in Asser Region: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background Foot problems continue to be the leading cause of hospital admissions among people with diabetes. The objective of this study was to explore and assess the knowledge and attitudes of individuals about diabetic foot ulcers in the Asser region, Saudi Arabia. Methodology An anonymous, online, cross-sectional survey was conducted. The questionnaire was distributed through commonly used social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Results A total of 445 participants were included in this survey. Overall, 37.1% (165) were aged 18-25 years, 64.3% (286) were women, and 75.7% (337) had university-level education. A significant number of participants had relatives with diabetes (57.1%, 254), while a smaller percentage reported having diabetes themselves (7.3%, 33), and a substantial proportion were neither diabetic nor had a relative with diabetes (35.6%, (158). Nearly two-fifths of the participants (37.8%, 168) received information about diabetes and diabetic foot care from physicians, and 34.1% (152) of the participants accessed information online. There were significant differences between those who did not have diabetes mellitus (DM) and those who had DM or whose relatives were diabetic in responses to the following questions: "Do you think that diabetes may cause gangrene in the foot?" (50.9% (205) vs. 45.7% (32), p = 0.019), "Do you think that preventing diabetic foot ulcers is more important than treating diabetic foot ulcers?" (60.8% (228) vs. 46.9% (60), p = 0.002), and "Do you think it is important to constantly monitor diabetic foot wounds?" (63.1% (200) vs. 30.4% (17), p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between groups in the practice of daily foot checks, washing feet, moisturizing feet, keeping feet away from hot and cold, and nail care (p < 0.001). Conclusions The participants in the study showed a lack of knowledge regarding diabetic foot care, indicating the potential for better outcomes through the implementation of enhanced health education programs.

Clinical presentation of group B Streptococcus-infected diabetic foot ulcers

OBJECTIVE

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a common pathogen in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), where it has been found to result in higher rates of soft tissue infection and amputation despite appropriate treatment. In this study, we aim to investigate clinical characteristics and prognosis of GBS DFU infections, especially those with tenosynovial involvement. We hypothesise that GBS-infected DFUs with tenosynovial involvement leads to an increased number of recurrent infections and unexpected returns to the operating room.

METHOD

Data were retrospectively collected from GBS-infected DFU patients surgically treated by an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon over a four-year period. Demographics, comorbidities, initial laboratory values and culture results from infected bone samples were recorded. Clinical outcome was assessed by recurrent infection and unplanned reoperation(s) within 3 months following the initial surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 72 patients were treated for GBS-infected DFUs. Intra-operative culture of infected bone identified GBS in 16 patients (22.2%). Significantly more black patients (p=0.017) were afflicted by GBS DFUs. Patients with GBS DFUs had higher initial haemoglobin A1C levels (p=0.019), and those with tenosynovial involvement were likely to require reoperation (p=0.036) and had a greater total number of surgeries (p=0.015) than those without.

CONCLUSION

GBS-infected DFUs are more common in black patients and those with elevated haemoglobin A1Cs. GBS infections with tenosynovial involvement are particularly destructive and require aggressive treatment by surgeons.

Predictive Factors for Lower Limb Amputation in Type 2 Diabetics

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major public health problem. Foot-related complications are common in diabetic patients. The aim of this study is to identify predictive factors for lower limb amputation (LLA) in order to better identify this at-risk population.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving 134 patients who were hospitalised for the management of T2DM complicated by diabetic foot, in the department of endocrinology and diabetology. We included patients with T2DM whose diabetes was diagnosed 10 years ago or more, and who had a diabetic foot problem. Statistical differences between predictors of amputations were tested using: t-tests for numerical variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Significant variables were analysed by logistic regression to determine significant predictors.

RESULTS

The mean duration of diabetes was 17±7 years. We found that 70% of patients with LLA were older than 50 years (p<10-3). The prevalence of LLA was higher (p=0.015) in patients with diabetes for more than 20 years. We noted that 58% of patients who underwent LLA were hypertensive (p<10-3). The majority of patients with LLA (58%) had abnormal micro-albuminuria (p<10-3). We found that 70% (n=12) of patients with LLA had low-density protein cholesterol levels above the target value (p<10^-3). Diabetic foot grade ≥4 (4 or 5) according to Wagner's classification, was present in 24% of amputee patients. Based on a 95% confidence interval level, the independent significant predictive factors for LLA in our patients were: T2DM for more than 20 years, hypertension and diabetic foot grade ≥4.

CONCLUSIONS

After multivariate analysis, the significant independent predictive factors associated with LLA were: T2DM for more than 20 years, hypertension, and diabetic foot grade ≥4. Early management of diabetic foot problems is therefore recommended to avoid amputations.