Early stage clinical trials for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder affecting about 1 in 5,000 males. The gold standard for prophylaxis and treatment of acute bleeding has been factor (F) VIII concentrate. A multitude of treatment modalities are now available and under clinical investigation.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses ongoing/recently completed early-phase clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in patients with hemophilia A through April 2022. These new pipeline therapies are focused on addressing the safety and efficacy of new factor-related products, non-factor related products, and gene therapy options for hemophilia.

EXPERT OPINION

Current standard of care effectively prevents and treats acute bleeding and has significantly improved the quality of life in hemophilia. The biggest challenges in the improvement of care are treatment-related burden and the burden of cost in developing countries. New drugs under development are likely to enter practice by the end of this decade and address many of the unmet needs particularly of those with severe disease. Data is limited in unique populations (e.g. congenital/inherited FVIII inhibitors, non-severe hemophilia A, women/girls with hemophilia and children) which are important areas for future research; additional clinical trials and long-term outcome data are necessary prior to incorporating these new therapies in our treatment arsenal.

Serial Next-Generation Sequencing of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Evaluating Tumor Clone Response To Molecularly Targeted Drug Administration

PURPOSE

We evaluated whether next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could be used for patient selection and as a tumor clone response biomarker in patients with advanced cancers participating in early-phase clinical trials of targeted drugs.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Plasma samples from patients with known tumor mutations who completed at least two courses of investigational targeted therapy were collected monthly, until disease progression. NGS was performed sequentially on the Ion Torrent PGM platform.

RESULTS

cfDNA was extracted from 39 patients with various tumor types. Treatments administered targeted mainly the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway (n = 28) or MEK (n = 7). Overall, 159 plasma samples were sequenced with a mean sequencing coverage achieved of 1,685X across experiments. At trial initiation (C1D1), 23 of 39 (59%) patients had at least one mutation identified in cfDNA (mean 2, range 1-5). Out of the 44 mutations identified at C1D1, TP53, PIK3CA and KRAS were the top 3 mutated genes identified, with 18 (41%), 9 (20%), 8 (18%) different mutations, respectively. Out of these 23 patients, 13 received a targeted drug matching their tumor profile. For the 23 patients with cfDNA mutation at C1D1, the monitoring of mutation allele frequency (AF) in consecutive plasma samples during treatment with targeted drugs demonstrated potential treatment associated clonal responses. Longitudinal monitoring of cfDNA samples with multiple mutations indicated the presence of separate clones behaving discordantly. Molecular changes at cfDNA mutation level were associated with time to disease progression by RECIST criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted NGS of cfDNA has potential clinical utility to monitor the delivery of targeted therapies.

Urinary kidney biomarkers for early detection of nephrotoxicity in clinical drug development

Early detection of drug-induced kidney injury is vital in drug development. Generally accepted biomarkers such as creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) lack sensitivity and early injury responses are missed. Many new biomarkers to detect nephrotoxicity for pre-clinical utilization have been described and their use is adopted in regulatory guidelines. However, guidance on appropriate biomarkers for clinical trials is minimal. We provide an overview of potentially useful kidney biomarkers that can be used in clinical trials. This includes guidance to select biomarkers suitable to capture specific characteristics of the (expected) kidney injury. We conclude that measurement of urinary kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1) serves many purposes and is often an appropriate choice. Cystatin C captures effects on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but this marker should preferably be combined with more specific markers to localize the origin of the observed effect. Untoward effects on tubules can be captured relatively well with several markers. Direct detection of glomerular injury is currently impossible since specific biomarkers are lacking. Indirect assessment of toxic effects on glomeruli is possible by using carefully selected panels of other injury markers. We conclude that it is possible to obtain appropriate information on nephrotoxicity in clinical drug development by using carefully selected panels of injury markers and suggest that identification and validation of specific glomerular biomarkers could be of great value.