The relation between second-generation antipsychotics and laxative use in elderly patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate factors associated with concomitant laxative use among elderly patients with schizophrenia, discharged on second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), from two large public psychiatric hospitals in Taiwan.

METHODS

Elderly patients with schizophrenia who were discharged between 2006 and 2019 and received SGA monotherapy at discharge were included in the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with regular laxative use at discharge. The Cochrane-Armitage trend test was used to evaluate whether significant time trends existed for rates of laxative use at discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 2591 elderly patients with schizophrenia were discharged during the study period, and 1727 of 2591 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included for analysis. Of these 1727 patients, 732 (42.4%) also received concomitant laxatives. Female gender, mood stabiliser use and concomitant diabetes mellitus were found to be associated with increased laxative use. Among SGAs, clozapine was associated with the highest rate of laxative use, followed by zotepine, quetiapine, olanzapine and risperidone. Additionally, risperidone, amisulpride, aripiprazole, paliperidone and sulpiride were associated with comparable rates of laxative use. Laxative use rates grew over time from 30.8% in 2006 to 46.6% in 2019 (z = 4.83, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laxative use is common in elderly schizophrenia patients treated with SGAs. In cases of clinically significant constipation, switching to an SGA with a lower risk for constipation, or discontinuing the use of mood stabilisers should be considered, if clinically feasible.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy among elderly patients with schizophrenia and dementia during hospitalization at a Taiwanese psychiatric hospital

BACKGROUND

This study was to investigate the prescribing patterns for antipsychotic drugs in elderly hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or dementia at a psychiatric hospital in Taiwan from 2007 to 2012. This study also explored the predictors of antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP).

METHODS

We collected patients' demographic data, including year of admission, age, gender, and length of hospital stay, and drug-related information.

RESULTS

Second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) monotherapy was the most common type of therapy in both those with dementia and with schizophrenia, and quetiapine and risperidone were the most commonly prescribed drugs for these conditions, respectively. In late-life schizophrenia, 33.8% of the patients used first-generation antipsychotics (FGA) alone. Regarding APP, a combination of FGA and SGA and combinations of SGA were most commonly noted in schizophrenia patients and dementia patients, respectively. Overall, APP increased from 2007 to 2012. It was significantly more common in patients with dementia (odds ratio: 3.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-9.39, P = 0.014), less concurrent use of hypnotics and sedatives (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.99, P = 0.046), and a higher-than-recommended dose of antipsychotic drugs (odds ratio: 4.98, 95% confidence interval: 2.75-9.02, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FGA are still commonly used for the late-life schizophrenia at our hospital. Given their potentially hazardous side effects, FGA must be employed with caution. The use of APP involving SGA increased over the 6 years of the study period, especially among patients with dementia. However, the use of SGA in dementia began to decline after the US Food and Drug Administration's 2005 warning about SGA being associated with increased mortality in dementia patients, which contrasts with the trends examined in this study. Further controlled trials exploring the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of APP in this population are warranted to gain an additional insight into this practice.

Relationship between the plasma concentration of paliperidone and the clinical and drug-induced extrapyramidal symptoms in elderly patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the relationship between the plasma concentration of paliperidone (PAL) and clinical and drug-induced extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in elderly patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

In this study, 15 patients with schizophrenia receiving risperidone were switched to PAL and treated for 12 weeks. Their clinical symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness Scale. Their EPS were assessed using the Drug-induced EPS Scale, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, and Barnes Akathisia Scale at baseline and 12 weeks. Plasma concentrations were measured by the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method.

RESULTS

The results revealed that there were significant correlations between the plasma concentration of PAL and improved Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total, negative, and general psychopathology scores (p<0.05). However, the efficacy did not improve linearly with plasma level. No significant correlations were found between the PAL plasma concentration and the mean change from baseline in the Drug-induced EPS Scale total score, Barnes Akathisia Scale, or Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this research suggested that, in elderly patients, although none of an increased plasma concentration of PAL, a worsening of EPS, or an increase in prolactin level occurs, linear clinical efficacy may not be obtained.

A naturalistic comparison of the efficacy and safety of intramuscular olanzapine and intramuscular haloperidol in agitated elderly patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

This study was a comparative investigation of the clinical efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine and IM haloperidol in agitated elderly patients with schizophrenia at 2 hours postdose.

METHODS

The subjects were 23 inpatients who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Their clinical symptoms were assessed using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PANSS-EC), PANSS and Agitation Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES), and their safety were assessed using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

The mean reduction from baseline on the PANSS-EC total score, the PANSS total score and the ACES score were significantly greater in the IM olanzapine injection group than in the IM haloperidol injection group. The mean changes from baseline on the AIMS score, the BARS score and the DIEPSS total score were significantly better in the IM olanzapine injection group than in the IM haloperidol injection group. No serious adverse events such as paralytic ileus, diabetic ketoacidosis, neuroleptic malignant syndrome or tardive dyskinesia occurred between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest the possibility that agitated elderly patients may result in superior efficacy and safety after IM olanzapine without serious adverse events in comparison with IM haloperidol.

A naturalistic comparison of the efficacy and safety of intramuscular olanzapine and intramuscular levomepromazine in agitated elderly patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

There have not been any reports in Japan clarifying the efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine and IM levomepromazine in agitated elderly patients with schizophrenia. This study was a comparative investigation of the clinical efficacy and safety of IM olanzapine and IM levomepromazine in agitated elderly patients with schizophrenia at 2 hours post-dose.

METHODS

The subjects were 52 inpatients who were diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV. Their clinical symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PANSS-EC), PANSS, and Agitation Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES), and their safety was assessed using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS), and glucose test.

RESULTS

The PANSS-EC total score, the ACES score, and the glucose level significantly decreased from baseline in both the IM olanzapine group and the levomepromazine injection group; however, no between-group differences were observed. Mean change from baseline in the PANSS total score, positive score, the BARS score, and the DIEPSS total score was significantly greater in the IM olanzapine injection group compared with the levomepromazine injection group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that agitated elderly patients rapidly respond to IM olanzapine and IM levomepromazine treatment. Furthermore, these results suggest that IM olanzapine is safer than IM levomepromazine and causes greater improvement in positive symptoms.