A comparison of measured and treatment planning system out-of-field dose for a 1.5 T MR linac

Objective.Dose due to the electron streaming effect (ESE) is a significant contribution to out-of-field dose on the Elekta Unity MR-Linac. The aim of this work is to provide a systematic comparison of calculated and measured streaming dose for this system.Approach.Beams 1.0 × 1.0 cm2to 5.0 × 5.0 cm2, gantry 90.0°, 1000 MU, were incident on an in-house phantom. At the beam entrance and exit surfaces of the phantom, ESE was generated in theY-direction (IEC 61217). EBT3 film, orientated within theX-Zplane and at 14.0 mm depth in a solid water block, was used to determine ESE dose 5.0 cm beyond the phantom. The experimental arrangement was simulated in the Monaco v5.4 treatment planning system (TPS), utilising a CT phantom dataset with differing relative electron densities (RED) for the surrounding air. Horizontal (Xdirection) and vertical (Zdirection) film dose profiles were compared to the corresponding TPS profiles.Main results. For each field, the maximum ESE dose was observed at the beam exit, the magnitude of which decreases with decreasing field size. For the 5.0 × 5.0 cm2field, the exit and entry ESE doses were 19.6% and 7.0% of theDmaxdose to water, respectively. Across horizontal profiles, differences (simulated-measured) were reduced with smaller fields and lower RED. The maximum absolute profile difference was 1.7% of theDmaxdose to water for optimal RED and isocentre location. In vertical profiles an offset consistent with the Lorentz force was observed relative to theX-Yisoplane.Significance. For the fields investigated, maximum absolute differences (simulated-measured) ≤ 5.2% occurred in peak regions of ESE, at the beam entrance and exit from the phantom. Generally, there is good agreement between Monaco simulated and measured ESE. Simulated out-of-field dose is sensitive to the RED assigned to air structures and unforced RED optimises out-of-field dose calculation accuracy.

Elekta Unity MR-linac commissioning: mechanical and dosimetry tests

We report the commissioning results of Elekta Unity for the dosimetric performance and mechanical quality assurance (QA), and propose additional commissioning procedures. Mechanical tests included multi-leaf collimator (MLC) positional accuracy, radiation isocenter diameter at the center and off-center position, and coincidence between the magnetic resonance (MR) image center and radiation isocenter. Comparisons between the measurements and calculations of the simple irradiated field, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) commissioning, MLC output factor ratio, validation of independent dose calculation software and end-to-end testing were performed to evaluate dosimetric performance. The average values of the MLC positional accuracy for film- and imaging device-based analysis were −0.1 and 0.3 mm, respectively. The measured radiation isocenter size was 0.41 mm, and the off-center results were within 1 mm. The coincidence was −0.21, −1.19 and 0.49 mm along the x-, y- and z-axes, respectively. The calculated percent depth doses (PDD) and profiles agreed with the measurements. The results of independent dose calculation were within the action level recommended by American Associations of Physicist in Medicine. The gamma passing rate (GPR) for IMRT commissioning was 98.6 ± 0.9%, and end-to-end testing of adapted plans showed agreement within 2% between the measurement and calculation. We reported the results of mechanical and dosimetric performances of Elekta Unity, and proposed novel commissioning procedures. Our results should provide knowledge to the physics community for enhancing the QA programs.

An investigation of using log-file analysis for automated patient-specific quality assurance in MRgRT

Objective

Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is an integral part of MR‐guided RT (MRgRT), requiring a new RT plan for each treatment fraction and resulting in a significant increase in patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA). This study investigates the possibility of using treatment log‐file for automated PSQA.

Method

All treatment plans were delivered in 1.5T Unity MR‐Linac (Elekta). A Unity compatible version of LinacView (Standard Imaging) was commissioned to automatically monitor and analyze the log‐files. A total of 220 fields were delivered and measured by ArcCheck^®‐MR (Sun Nuclear) and LinacView. Thirty incorrectly matched fields were also delivered to check for error detection sensitivity. The gamma analysis, γ, with 3%, 3 mm criteria was used in both ArcCheck^®‐MR and LinacView. Additionally, the gantry angle, jaws, and multileaf collimators (MLC) positions reported in the log‐file were compared with plan positions using TG‐142 criteria.

Result

The γ (3%, 3 mm) for the 190 plans were found to be between the range of 72.5%–100.0% and 95.4%–100.0% for ArcCheck^®‐MR and LinacVeiw, respectively. All the delivered gantry angle and jaws were found to be within 0.2° and 2 mm. MLCs that were outside the guard leaves or under the diaphragms were found to have more than 1.0 mm discrepancy. This was attributed to the linac internal override for these MLCs and had no dosimetric impact. Excluding these discrepancies, all MLC positions were found to be within 1.0 mm. The γ (3%, 3 mm) for the 30 incorrectly matched fields were found to be 3.9%–84.8% and 0.1%–64.4% for ArcCheck^®‐MR and LinacVeiw, respectively.

Conclusion

Significant ranked correlation demonstrates the automated log‐file analysis can be used for PSQA and expedite the ART workflow. Ongoing PSQA will be compared with log‐file analysis to investigate the longer term reproducibility and correlation.