Long-term Outcomes of Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis in Patients ≥90 Years Old: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Objective The safety and prognosis of complete stone removal for the treatment of choledocholithiasis in older patients are unknown. This multicenter retrospective study assessed the outcomes of complete stone removal in elderly patients (≥90 years) with respect to the prognosis. Methods We divided patients who underwent endoscopic cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis into two groups: complete stone removal or incomplete stone removal with plastic stent insertion. The patient characteristics, adverse events, number of endoscopic cholangiopancreatographies, overall survival rates, and disease-specific cumulative death were compared between the groups. Patients Two hundred and twenty-three participants ≥90 years old were included in the study, including 48 (22%) men and 175 (78%) women. The median age was 92 (range, 90-104) years old. There were 160 (72%) and 63 (28%) patients in the complete and incomplete groups, respectively. Results The age, performance status, comorbidities, severe complication rates, and stone diameter were comparable between the groups. The proportion of patients with at least 5 stones was significantly higher in the incomplete group than in the complete group [complete group: 8.1% (13/160) and incomplete group: 21% (13/63), p<0.01]. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in the complete group (p<0.01), while the disease-specific cumulative death rate was higher in the incomplete group (p<0.01). Conclusion Complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis may contribute to a better prognosis in elderly patients ≥90 years old.

Choledocholithiasis in elderly patients with gallbladder in situ - is ERCP sufficient?

INTRODUCTION

Along with increased life expectancy, the proportion of elderly patients with choledocholithiasis will increase and with this, the need for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Current recommendations suggest laparoscopic cholecystectomy in all patients with choledocholithiasis to prevent biliary events. However, adherence to these recommendations is low, especially in older patients.

METHODS

Retrospective study that included non-cholecystectomized patients aged > =75 years who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis from 2013-2016 (n = 131). A new biliary event was defined as the need for a new ERCP, cholecystitis, cholangitis or gallstone pancreatitis.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of new biliary events and mortality in cholecystectomized vs non-cholecystectomized patients after ERCP.

RESULTS

Cholecystectomy was performed in 22% of the patients (92% laparoscopic). The post-cholecystectomy complication rate was 13% and the mortality rate was 7%. During the follow-up period (669 ± 487 days) a new biliary event occurred in 20% of patients - 10% new ERCP, 9% cholecystitis, 9% cholangitis and 2% pancreatitis. Cholecystectomized patients had fewer events (7% vs 24%, p = .048) and longer time to event (p = .016). There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality (14% vs 27%, p = .13), mortality related to lithiasis (0% vs 9%, p = .11) or time to mortality from all causes (p = .07) and related to biliary events (p = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of elderly patients, cholecystectomy after ERCP prevented the occurrence of new biliary events but resulted in a non-statistically significant difference in mortality.

Evolving endoscopic surgery

Since the days of Albukasim in medieval Spain, natural orifices have been regarded not only as a rather repugnant source of bodily odors, fluids and excreta, but also as a convenient invitation to explore and treat the inner passages of the organism. However, surgical ingenuity needed to be matched by appropriate tools and devices. Lack of technologically advanced instrumentation was a strong deterrent during almost a millennium until recent decades when a quantum jump materialized. Endoscopic surgery is currently a vibrant and growing subspecialty, which successfully handles millions of patients every year. Additional opportunities lie ahead which might benefit millions more, however, requiring even more sophisticated apparatuses, particularly in the field of robotics, artificial intelligence, and tissue repair (surgical suturing). This is a particularly exciting and worthwhile challenge, namely of larger and safer endoscopic interventions, followed by seamless and scarless recovery. In synthesis, the future is widely open for those who use together intelligence and creativity to develop new prototypes, new accessories and new techniques. Yet there are many challenges in the path of endoscopic surgery. In this new era of robotic endoscopy, one will likely need a virtual simulator to train and assess the performance of younger doctors. More evidence will be essential in multiple evolving fields, particularly to elucidate whether more ambitious and complex pathways, such as intrathoracic and intraperitoneal surgery via natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), are superior or not to conventional techniques.