[Value of purple sign for predicting rebleeding events in cirrhotic patients following endoscopic selective varices devascularization]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of the purple sign for predicting long-term rebleeding events in cirrhotic patients following endoscopic selective varices devascularization.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 97 patients with liver cirrhosis, who had a history of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and underwent endoscopic selective varices devascularization. Thirty-two of the patients showed purple sign after endoscopic treatment. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize the selection bias of the patients (purple sign vs no purple sign) and reduce the intergroup differences of clinical characteristics. The primary outcome measure of this study was cumulative rebleeding events after endoscopic selective varices devascularization.

RESULTS

The 1-year rebleeding rate (27.0% vs 36.7%) or 6-month rebleeding rate (10.9% vs 26.9%) following endoscopic treatment was not significantly different between the purple sign group and no purple sign group before PSM (P=0.2385). But after PSM, the 1-year rebleeding rate (28.2% vs 56.4%) and 6-month rebleeding rate (5.0% vs 37.0%) were significantly lower in the purple sign group than in the no purple sign group (P=0.0304).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of purple sign indicates a lower risk of rebleeding after endoscopic treatment of cirrhotic gastroesophageal varices and a potentially favorable treatment response after endoscopic therapy, thus providing a clinical indicator for stratification of the patients for sequential endoscopic sessions.

Effect of remifentanil combined with sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia on coagulation function and postoperative recovery of patients undergoing endoscopic selective varices devascularization

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of remifentanil combined with sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia on coagulation function and postoperative recovery of patients undergoing endoscopic selective varices devascularization (ESVD).

METHODS

Altogether 116 patients undergoing ESVD in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. The control group received propofol combined with remifentanil anesthesia, while the observation group received remifentanil combined with sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in coagulation function indexes between the control group and the observation group (P>0.05), and the clinical anesthesia effect of the observation group was better (P<0.001). Five minutes after intubation, compared with the control group, the clinical stress response index was better (all P<0.001), the quality of anesthesia recovery was higher (all P<0.001), the heart rate was better after anesthesia (P<0.001), and the incidence of adverse reactions was higher (P<0.01) in the observation group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with remifentanil combined with propofol anesthesia, remifentanil combined with sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia for ESVD can effectively improve the clinical anesthesia effect, improve the quality of anesthesia recovery, and reduce stress reactions, but the incidence of adverse reactions is increased. Therefore the clinical application still needs to be strengthened.