Effect of multiple loading FIT sample collection devices on faecal haemoglobin concentration

BACKGROUND

Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are routinely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes around the world. More recently, quantitative FIT has been recommended to help triage patients presenting to primary care with symptoms suggestive of CRC. Participants collect faecal samples using sampling probes which are inserted into sample collection devices (SCDs) containing preservative buffer. The SCDs have an internal collar designed to remove excess sample. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of multiple loading on faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) using SCDs of four FIT systems.

METHODS

Pools of f-Hb negative samples were spiked with blood, homogenised and loaded into SCDs 1, 3 and 5 times, with insertion of the sampling probes into the SCDs with and without mixing between loads. The f-Hb was measured using the relevant FIT system. The percentage change in f-Hb for multiple loads was compared with a single load for each system for the mixed and unmixed groups.

RESULTS

The p values show a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the mass and f-Hb for the mixed and unmixed group, for 1-3 and 1-5 loads for all systems. The median percentage change in f-Hb for the mixed is higher than the unmixed group.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that multiple loading does significantly increase the f-Hb in the SCDs.

Impact of time between faecal immunochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening on screening results: A natural experiment

Repeated rounds of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for occult blood is a common method for screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the time interval between FIT rounds is not thoroughly investigated. In a CRC screening trial in South-Eastern Norway, individuals were invited for biennial FIT between 2012 and 2019. The positivity threshold was >15 mcg haemoglobin/g faeces (mcg/g). Due to organizational challenges, the interval between screening rounds randomly varied between 1.5 and 3.5 years, forming a natural experiment. We investigated the detection rate of CRC and advanced neoplasia (AN: CRC or advanced adenoma) at the subsequent round (FIT₂ ), according to the faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) at the initial screening round (FIT₁ ), and time between the two screening rounds. 18 522 individuals with negative FIT₁ who attended FIT₂ were included in this study. 245 AN were detected at FIT₂ , of which 34 were CRC. The CRC detection rate at FIT₂ for participants with FIT₁  = 0 mcg/g was 0.09% while it was 0.28% for participant with 0 > FIT₁  ≤ 15 mcg/g; odds ratio (OR) 3.22, 95% CI 1.49-6.95. For each 3 months' increment between FITs, the OR for detecting CRC was 1.33 (95% CI 0.98-1.79), while the OR was 1.13 (1.02-1.26) for AN. Individuals with FIT₁ -value of 0 mcg/g, had a lower AN detection rate compared with participants with 0 > FIT₁  ≤ 15 mcg/g, irrespective of time between tests. Although CRC and AN detection rates increase with increasing time interval between FITs, individuals with undetectable f-Hb at first screen have substantially lower risk of CRC at the next screening round compared with individuals with detectable f-Hb.

Elucidating bidirectional relationship between metabolic syndrome and elevated faecal haemoglobin concentration: a Taiwanese community-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate the bidirectional temporal relationship between elevated faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) concentration and metabolic syndrome (MetS).

DESIGN

A longitudinal cohort study was conducted by utilising data on community-based periodical screening for colorectal cancer with faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and health check-up for MetS.

SETTING

Population-based organised integrated service screening in Keelung city, Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

We enrolled a total of 62,293 community residents aged 40-79 years.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Bidirectional outcomes of FIT-positive and MetS were measured.

RESULTS

The presence of MetS at baseline led to a statistically significant 31% elevated risk of being incident FIT-positive (adjusted HR, (aHR)=1.31, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.51) whereas the effect of those with FIT-positive at baseline on incident MetS was not statistically significant (aHR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.25) after adjusting for relevant confounders. Such an effect was particularly noted for three individual components (abnormal waist circumference, higher fasting plasma glucose and lower high-density lipoprotein).

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding on the presence of MetS before FIT-positive based on bidirectional relationship assessment suggests the control of MetS may contribute to reducing the risk of colorectal neoplasia through the early surveillance of f-Hb. However, such a temporal epidemiological finding still needs to be verified by using other external data.