Routine histopathologic examination of the resected specimen after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - what can be expected?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays an established bariatric procedure. Although preoperative gastroscopy is recommended to rule out severe pathologies, there is little evidence about the role of routine histopathologic examination of resected specimens. We sought to identify the prevalence of histopathological relevant findings in patients undergoing LSG and to evaluate their impact in clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis on a prospectively collected dataset on patients undergoing LSG between August 2009 and May 2018 in two bariatric centers was performed. Demographic and clinical data and histopathological results were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixhundred-thrirteen patients were identified, mean age was 43.1 years (14-75), average body mass index was 44.8 kg/m² (34.4-73.9). Histopathology revealed abnormal findings in 47.97% of the patients, most common pathology was chronic non-active or minimally to moderate active gastritis (n = 202;32.95%). Among others, Helicobacter-associated gastritis (n = 33;5.38%), intestinal metaplasia (n = 13;2.12%), micronodular enterochromaffine-like cell hyperplasia (n = 2; 0.33%) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n = 6; 0.98%) were present. No malignancies were found. Histopathological results required a change in the postoperative management in 48 patients (7.83%). The costs of histopathological assessment ranged between 0.77% and 2.55% of per-case payment.

CONCLUSION

A wide range of histopathological findings occur in specimens after LSG, requiring a relevant number of patients additional therapies or surveillance. Therefore, routine histopathological examination after LSG is recommendable.

Gastric specimens for diagnosing tuberculosis in adults unable to expectorate in Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Setting: Adult pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients unable to expectorate quality sputum represent a diagnostic challenge. A private hospital in Pakistan routinely performs gastric aspiration in adults with difficulties expectorating. Objective: To assess the usefulness of gastric specimens (GS) in diagnosing pulmonary TB (PTB) and drug-resistant TB in adult presumptive TB patients unable to expectorate, and to compare the diagnostic yield and sensitivity of smear, culture and the Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay. Design: This was a comparative cross-sectional study based on retrospective record review. Results: Of 900, 885 and 877 GS tested by smear, Xpert and culture, respectively, interpretable results were obtained for respectively 900 (100%), 859 (97.1%) and 754 (86.0%), with a diagnostic yield of respectively 23.6%, 30.3% and 24.9%. The yield was significantly higher for Xpert in previously treated patients. There were 313 patients with definite TB, defined as positive on Xpert and/or culture. The 82.8% sensitivity of Xpert was significantly higher than that of smear (61.0%) and culture (67.8%). Conclusion: GS obtained by aspiration under routine programme conditions is useful for detecting TB and drug-resistant TB in adult patients unable to expectorate. Xpert, with its rapid testing, high proportion of interpretable results and better sensitivity, can substantially improve the diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed TB and rifampicin resistance.