Treatment of deep single RT2 and RT3 antero-mandibular gingival recessions with a combination of surgical techniques: A case series study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate root coverage (RC) in deep single antero-mandibular RT2 and RT3 gingival recessions (GR) and to investigate the influence of several factors in RC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen single antero-mandibular GR with a minimum depth of 3 mm were consecutively treated with a new one-stage technique (laterally positioned flap with a tunnel access and a connective tissue graft). At baseline and at 12-month follow-up, the percentage of mean root coverage (%MRC), the recession reduction (RecRed), complete root coverage (CRC) and the gain of keratinized tissue width (KTW) were assessed. Descriptive, intergroup comparative and correlation analyses were performed.

RESULTS

At 12 months, a %MRC of 77.29 ± 21.48% with a mean RecRed of 4.10 ± 1.51 mm was achieved. The %MRC was 84.71 ± 21.08% in RT2, and 62.43 ± 14.17% in RT3. The mean gain of KTW was 2.10 ± 0.89 mm, with a mean gain of 2.0 ± 1.03 mm for RT2 and 2.3 ± 0.57 mm for RT3. CRC was observed in six cases, all of them being RT2. A positive association was found between the %MRC and the initial position of the tooth and of both papillae.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique might be a valuable approach for the treatment of deep single antero-mandibular RT2 and RT3 recessions, even in malpositioned teeth.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

A combination of different surgical techniques could provide greater vascularization to the CTG especially in malpositioned teeth in sextant V with a large avascular area to be covered.

Comparative evaluation of pinhole surgical technique with and without A-PRF in the treatment of multiple adjacent recession defects: A clinico radiographic study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and compare efficacy of pinhole surgical technique (PST) alone and with advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) in the management of bilateral multiple adjacent gingival recession defects (MAGRD).

METHODS

One hundred and sixty five MAGRD were randomly assigned to control group (treated with PST) and test group (PST with A-PRF). Clinical parameters of gingival recession depth (GRD), gingival recession width (GRW), width of keratinised gingiva (WKG), complete root coverage (CRC) and gingival thickness (GT) on ST-CBCT was measured at 2, 4 and 6 mm apically from the gingival margin. Also, root coverage aesthetic score and patient satisfaction ratings were recorded at baseline, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Substantial reduction in GRD (Test: 1.29 ± 0.69 mm and Control 0.98 ± 0.30 mm) (p < 0.001) and GRW (Test: 2.03 ± 0.90 mm and control 1.73 ± 0.99 mm) (p < 0.05) with associated gain in WKG and GT was observed (p < 0.001). Mean GT values were increased in both the groups at 2, 4 and 6 mm from the crest. Comparison of Test and Control groups yielded significant reductions in GRD (-0.17 ± 0.56 mm) and WKG (0.73 ± 1.07 mm) favoring the Test group (p < 0.05). Similar increase in GT was observed with better results in Test than control group. (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both groups exhibited sound clinical outcomes with test group offering better resolution of MAGRD in comparison to control group. Also, it enhances clinical and therapeutic end results in terms of attaining reduction in GRD and GRW along with greater gain in KTW and GT.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

PST as a minimally invasive approach has numerous benefits, some of which include the absence of scarring and improved aesthetics linked to faster wound healing. The addition of A-PRF enhances the intended therapy outcomes, which is beneficial for both patients and professionals in the field of periodontics.

Dynamics of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and -8 Secretion in Gingival Crevicular Fluid after Gingival Recession Therapy via MCAT with Either Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft or Collagen Matrix

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine and estimate the changing levels of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 8 (MMP-1 and MMP-8) in GCF at consecutive stages of healing after root coverage procedure via modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) combined with either sub-epithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) or collagen matrix (CM) and also to relate those changes to clinical outcomes of both therapeutic approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 20 patients with a total of 91 recessions. Those on one side of the mandible received MCAT plus CM while the contralateral ones MCAT plus SCTG. The evaluation of MMP-1 and MMP-8 concentrations in Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) took place at baseline, then at 1, 2, and 4 weeks, and finally at 3 months after surgery. Elisa protocol was applied to determine the levels of MMP-1 and MMP-8 in GCF.

RESULTS

Three-month observation revealed statistically significant changes in MMP-1, MMP-8 and Sulcus Fluid Flow Rate (SFFR) values after implementation of both techniques. A correlation was found between a difference in MMP-1 concentrations and gain in Keratinized Tissue (KT) after SCTG and CM. MMP-8 levels and a Gingival Thickness (GT) gain observed after CM was also correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

A type of augmentative material does appear to determine the dynamics of MMP-1 secretion.

"V-Reverse" Suturing Technique for Tunnel Soft Tissue Graft and Flap Stabilization: Technique Illustration

INTRODUCTION

In periodontal and peri-implant plastic procedures, proper stabilization of the graft and the flap plays a crucial role in the outcomes. While the coronally advanced flap allows for better access with the possibility of suturing the graft to the periosteum and the de-epithelialized papillae, there is little evidence regarding what is the best approach in stabilizing the graft and the flap when performing the tunnel techniques (TUN). The purpose of this technical note is to describe a new suturing technique "V-reverse" for stabilization of the graft and the flap during a TUN procedure.

CASE PRESENTATION

The V-reverse suturing technique was used to enhance the stabilization of the graft and the flap during root coverage procedures, papilla augmentation, and immediate implant placement. Other advantages of this technique include reduced flap and graft micromotion; simple, easy, and fast procedure; and high patient compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

The present article describes three main clinical scenarios in which V-reverse suturing technique is used to stabilize TUN + connective tissue graft for root coverage procedures, papilla augmentation, and immediate implant placement.

Efficacy of Enamel Derivatives to Improve Keratinized Tissue as Adjunct to Coverage of Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The systematic review was designed to answer the following focused question: Are enamel matrix derivatives able to improve the quantity of keratinized tissue (KT) around natural dentition in patients with recessions defects after their treatment with periodontal plastic procedures? Methods: Only Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) in English language evaluating root coverage procedures in combination with enamel matrix derivatives (commercially known as Emdogain^®—EMD), with at least 10 subjects and a minimum duration of six months, were included. The search was applied to PUBMED and SCOPUS and it consists of a combination of MeSH terms and free text words (from January 2000 to June 2019). Risk of bias in individual studies and across studies was also evaluated. Results: After the full text analysis and the exclusion of further 18 articles, 12 articles were finally included. In total 639 recessions were treated (334 tests and 305 control). The recessions defects were classified according to the classification of Miller (Class I, II, III, IV). Only one trial included Miller Class III recessions (7 in total). Enamel matrix derivatives were applied in conjunction with Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF), Coronally Advanced Flap + Sub Epithelial Connective Tissue Graft (CAF + CTG), Semilunar Flap (SF). For the group CAF vs CAF + EMD the mean difference between the keratinized tissue gain in the two procedures was 0.40 mm (95% Confindence Interval Lower/Upper: 0.014–0.81) (p < 0.058); for the comparison CAF + CTG + EMD vs. CAF + CTG the mean difference between the two groups resulted in −0.06 mm (95% Confindence Interval Lower Upper −0.45 to 0.33) (p = 0.7603). Discussion: Randomized clinical trials included medium-low quality evidence. The application of Enamel Matrix Derivatives to surgical procedures aimed to cover gingival recessions does not add robust clinical benefit to conventional plastic procedure alone.

European survey on criteria of aesthetics for periodontal evaluation: The ESCAPE study

OBJECTIVE

The ESCAPE multicentre survey was designed to (a) compare the agreement of three relevant aesthetic scoring systems among different centres, and (b) evaluate the reproducibility of each question of the questionnaires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EFP centres (n = 14) were involved in an e-survey. Forty-two participants (28 teachers, 14 postgraduate students) were asked to score the one-year aesthetic outcomes of photographs using the Before-After Scoring System (BASS), the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and the Root coverage Esthetic Score (RES). Mean values of kappa statistics performed on each question were provided to resume global agreement of each method.

RESULTS

Between teachers, a difference of kappa ≥ 0.41 (p = .01) was found for BASS (75%) and PES (57%). Similarly, RES (84%) and PES (57%) were different (p < .001). No difference was found between BASS (75%) and RES (84%). No difference was found between students, whatever the scoring system. Questions of each scoring system showed differences in their reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of this study indicate that BASS and RES scoring systems are reproducible tools to evaluate aesthetic after root coverage therapies between different centres. Among the various variables, lack of scar, degree of root coverage, colour match and gingival margin that follows the CEJ show the best reliability.

Root surface modifiers and subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Many techniques and flap designs have been used to treat gingival recession by root coverage, but subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) seems to be the gold standard procedure. In an attempt to improve the healing process and increase the success rate of root coverage, some authors have used root modifiers, including different root conditioners, lasers, EMD, recombinant human growth factors and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of root biomodification in clinical outcomes of gingival recessions treated with SCTG.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Studies reporting SCTG associated with any form of root surface biomodification for root coverage of gingival recessions (Miller Class I and Class II) were considered as eligible for inclusion. Studies needed to have data of clinical outcomes in a follow up of at least 6 months. Screening of the articles, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate.

RESULTS

None of the products evaluated (citric acid, EDTA, PRP, lasers and EMD) showed evident benefits in clinical outcomes. Test and control groups presented similar outcomes related to root coverage and periodontal parameters, with no statistical differences between them. The exception was root biomodification with the neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, which impaired root coverage and had a detrimental effect on clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Based on the present clinical data, the use of root surface modifiers to improve clinical outcomes in gingival recessions treated with SCTG is not justified. More in vivo studies, and randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes and extended follow up, are necessary.