Does Academic Productivity Correlate With Industry Payments in Hand Surgery Fellowship Programs in the United States?

BACKGROUND

Hand surgeons and the industry share a common goal to improve the care of patients. However, industry support remains controversial, and the current relationship with fellowship programs remains unclear. This study explores the relationship between industry support and research productivity among hand surgeons in the academic setting.

METHODS

The Open Payments database, created by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a result of the Sunshine Act, was used to identify supplemental income paid to physicians of hand surgery fellowships in the United States. Both lifetime individual physician and aggregated fellowship Sunshine Act supplemental income (2015-2021) were collected for review. Supplemental income only reflects royalties, consulting fees, or food and does not include direct research funding. H-index was collected through the Scopus website as a proxy for academic productivity.

RESULTS

Six hundred and thirty-four faculty physicians (90.8%) from 94 hand surgery fellowships (100%) were included in the study. The mean individual physician lifetime supplemental income was $67,272 (median $341,861), whereas the mean individual physician H-index was 12.5 (median 9.0). There was a significant and weak positive correlation between individual physician H-index and lifetime income (p<0.001). Similarly, there was a significant and moderately positive correlation between the combined fellowship H-index and total lifetime income (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Research productivity of an orthopedic hand fellowship group and individual academic hand surgeon correlate with overall industry support from indirect research funding. Further work is required to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of industry support of academically productive hand surgeons at hand surgery fellowships.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Hand Surgery Milestones V2.0 Development and Implementation: What Fellowship Directors, Faculty, and Fellows Need to Know

Milestones have been in effect for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited hand surgery fellowships since 2015. In 2016, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education began an improvement process to make the milestones easier to read, understand, and assess. This article looks at the process used for hand surgery, makes comparisons between the two versions, and discusses the resulting changes. A representative group of hand surgery faculty and fellows worked together to review the milestones data and identify necessary changes. Working iteratively in large and small groups, the milestones were edited, and a supplemental guide was developed. The new hand surgery milestones have fewer patient care subcompetencies, yet include the same overarching themes. The medical knowledge subcompetencies have been reduced to four, and they now focus on key dimensions of knowledge development instead of pure anatomical knowledge. Systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills include subcompetencies harmonized with all other accredited programs. Finally, the supplemental guide was created as an aid to clinical competency committees to provide clear understanding of the intent of the milestones. The guide includes examples for individual milestones, ideas for how to assess each subcompetency, and resources for faculty and fellows alike. The new hand surgery milestones were designed to be clearer and easier for clinical competency committees to evaluate and for faculty and fellows to understand. The accompanying supplemental guide is a new addition that will help individual programs better understand how to implement these changes. The new hand surgery milestones can be found at https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pdfs/milestones/handsurgerymilestones.pdf.

Leadership Trends at Hand Surgery Fellowships

BACKGROUND

Fellowship directors (FDs) influence the future of trainees in the field of hand surgery. Currently, there are no studies that analyze the demographic background, institutional training, and academic experience of hand surgery FDs. This study aims to serve as a framework to understand the landscape of current leadership positions in hand surgery education and to identify opportunities to improve FD diversity.

METHODS

The American Society for Surgery of the Hand Fellowship Directory was reviewed to include all hand surgery fellowships in the United States. Collected demographic information regarding FDs included age, sex, ethnicity, residency/fellowship training, residency/fellowship graduation year, year hired by current institution, time since training completion until FD appointment, length in FD role, and H-index.

RESULTS

Of the 90 FDs included, 86.7% were men and 71.4% self-reported as Caucasian. The average H-index was 13.98 and significantly correlated with age and duration as FD; 71.1% of FDs were trained in orthopedic surgery. The most attended residency program was the University of Pennsylvania; Mayo Clinic and Harvard University were the most represented fellowship programs.

CONCLUSION

This review reveals specific trends in demographic backgrounds, institutional training, and academic experiences among current FDs in hand surgery. Our observations, such as racial/ethnic and sex disparities, may offer opportunities to improve the representation of the communities these physicians serve. In addition, the trends described in this study provide objective data among current hand surgery FDs and could serve as a guide for individuals who desire academic leadership roles.

Prospective Fellows' Appraisal of Hand Surgery Fellowships

PURPOSE

The nature and focus of hand surgery fellowships has been shown to vary. Compounding this issue is a paucity of information regarding the educational goals and desires of prospective fellows. The purpose of this study was to understand applicant motivation for pursuing a fellowship and the most important components of these fellowships.

METHODS

We performed an anonymous survey of all the candidates who applied for a hand surgery fellowship during the 2019-2020 academic year to establish general demographic information, preferences regarding fellowship size, and the importance of various educational and logistical components. We also recorded self-reported comfort level in treating pathologies encountered during a hand-focused subspecialty practice.

RESULTS

The most important motivation cited for pursuing a fellowship in hand surgery was the "complexity and variety of cases" (n = 55, 90%). The 5 most important desired components of a fellowship were the exposure to "bread and butter" hand surgery (n = 35, 57%), ability to take level 1 hand call (n = 26, 43%), exposure to complex wrist reconstruction (n = 26, 43%) or peripheral nerve surgery/transfers (n = 23, 38%), and soft tissue coverage including free flaps (n = 19, 31%). Further analysis revealed that the orthopedic surgery residents frequently rated exposure to level 1 call (n = 20, 45%) as 1 of their 3 most important characteristics, whereas the plastic/general surgery residents frequently ranked exposure to complex wrist reconstruction (n = 16, 38%) as 1 of their 3 most important characteristics. The components of a fellowship that received the fewest selections into an applicant's top 3 components were exposure to shoulder surgery (n = 1, 1.64%), education regarding practice building/billing (n = 2, 3.2%), and the ability to conduct research (n = 4, 6.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most applicants pursue a subspecialty training in hand surgery because of the field's variety and breadth of cases. The applicants prioritize exposure to "bread and butter" cases in conjunction with both complex soft tissue and microsurgical reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Assisting hand fellowships in understanding what is most important to prospective fellows will allow for appropriate recruitment and development of the field of hand surgery in general.