Using a novel hemostatic peptide solution to prevent bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of a gastric tumor

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal dissection has become the standard treatment for early gastric cancer. However, post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcer occurs in 4.4% of patients. This study hypothesized whether applying PuraStat, a novel hemostatic peptide solution, prevents post-ESD bleeding.

AIM

To investigate the preventive potential of PuraStat, a hemostatic formulation, against bleeding in post-ESD gastric ulcers.

METHODS

Between May 2022 and March 2023, 101 patients (Group P) underwent ESD for gastric diseases at our hospital and received PuraStat (2 mL) for post-ESD ulcers. We retrospectively compared this group with a control group (Group C) comprising 297 patients who underwent ESD for gastric diseases at our hospital between April 2017 and March 2021. P values < 0.05 on two-sided tests indicated significance.

RESULTS

Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 6 (5.9%) (95%CI: 2.8–12.4) and 20 (6.7%) (95%CI: 4.4–10.2) patients in Groups P and C, respectively, with no significant between-group difference. The relative risk was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.95–1.07). The lesser curvature or anterior wall was the bleeding site in all 6 patients who experienced postoperative bleeding in Group P. In multivariate analysis, the odds ratios for resection diameter ≥ 50 mm and oral anticoagulant use were 6.63 (95%CI: 2.52–14.47; P = 0.0001) and 4.04 (1.26–0.69; P = 0.0164), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of post-ESD bleeding and PuraStat was 1.28 (95%CI: 0.28–2.15).

CONCLUSION

PuraStat application is not associated with post-ESD bleeding. However, the study suggests that gravitational forces may affect the effectiveness of applied PuraStat.

Efficacy of a new hemostatic forceps during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Currently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted standard treatment for early gastric cancer, but one challenging aspect of ESD is hemostasis. We developed a new hemostatic forceps (FD-Y0007) with the aim of achieving more effective hemostasis and investigated the hemostatic ability of the FD-Y0007 during gastric ESD in humans.

METHODS

This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial, which was conducted at a cancer referral center. Sixty-six patients who were scheduled to undergo ESD were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the Coagrasper or the FD-Y0007, which was used for hemostasis throughout the case. The primary end point was the time required to obtain hemostasis, which was measured for the first episode of bleeding during each case.

RESULTS

Hemostasis time for the first bleeding episode during ESD was 73.0 s for the Coagrasper and 21.5 s for the FD-Y0007 (P < 0.001). When all episodes of bleeding were included, hemostasis time was 56.8 s in the Coagrasper group and 25.5 s in FD-Y0007group (P < 0.0001). The frequency of adverse events (perforation: 3.4% vs 7.1%; delayed bleeding: 0% vs 0%) was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the Coagrasper, the FD-Y0007 efficiently reduces the hemostatic time during gastric ESD with no increase in adverse events.