A Laparoscopically Compatible Rapid-Adhesion Bioadhesive for Asymmetric Adhesion, Non-Pressing Hemostasis, and Seamless Seal

Bioadhesive hydrogels offer unprecedented opportunities in hemostatic agents and tissue sealing; however, the application of existing bioadhesive hydrogels through narrow spaces to achieve strong adhesion in fluid-rich physiological environments is challenged either by undesired indiscriminate adhesion or weak wet tissue adhesion. Here, a laparoscopically compatible asymmetric adhesive hydrogel (aAH) composed of sprayable adhesive hydrogel powders and injectable anti-adhesive glue is proposed for hemostasis and to seal the bloody tissues in a non-pressing way, allowing for preventing postoperative adhesion. The powders can seed on the irregular bloody wound to rapidly absorb interfacial fluid, crosslink, and form an adhesive hydrogel to hemostatic seal (blood clotting time and tissue sealing in 10 s, ≈200 mm Hg of burst pressure in sealed porcine tissues). The aAH can be simply formed by crosslinking the upper powder with injectable glue to prevent postoperative adhesion (adhesive strength as low as 1 kPa). The aAH outperforms commercial hemostatic agents and sealants in the sealing of bleeding organs in live rats, demonstrating superior anti-adhesive efficiency. Further, the hemostatic seamless sealing by aAH succeeds in shortening the time of warm ischemia, decreasing the blood loss, and reducing the possibility of rebleeding in the porcine laparoscopic partial nephrectomy model.

Comparison of ovarian reserve after cystectomy of ovarian endometrioma by bipolar coagulation, suture method, or hemostatic sealants: An updated meta-analysis

AIM

The purpose of the study was to compare the ovarian reserve after cystectomy of ovarian endometrioma by bipolar coagulation, suture method, or hemostatic sealants (HSs).

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of studies in which post-cystectomy serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) values were compared between bipolar coagulation and suture method or between bipolar coagulation and HSs. Through a literature search, we retrieved 14 articles which met inclusion criteria and were eligible for final analysis. The articles included 10 randomized trials, 3 prospective studies, and 1 retrospective study (n = 1435). The primary outcome was post-cystectomy serum AMH values.

RESULTS

Both bipolar coagulation and suture methods showed significantly lower post-cystectomy AMH values at 3, 6, and 12 months. However, post-cystectomy serum AMH values at 12 months were significantly higher in the suture method group compared to the bipolar coagulation (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.83, -0.38, p = 0.003, I2  = 89, n = 3). The suture method also showed a lower decline rate at 3 months post-cystectomy compared to the bipolar coagulation group (WMD: -25.13%, 95% CI: -49.56 to -0.70, p = 0.04, I2  = 95%, n = 2). Overall, pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups. Between the bipolar coagulation and HSs group, serum AMH values at 3 months post-cystectomy were similar (WMD: -0.46, 95% CI: -1.04 to 0.13, p = 0.13, I2  = 0%, n = 3). However, the HSs group showed a less decline rate at 3 months post-cystectomy compared to the bipolar coagulation group (WMD: -17.02%, 95% CI: -22.81, -11.23, p < 0.00001, I2  = 0%, n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the suture method and HSs may have potential benefits in the preservation of ovarian reserve over the bipolar coagulation method when cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma is performed.