Implementing Better Standard Instruments for Detecting Cirrhosis in Hepatitis C Patients

An increasing number of hepatitis C diagnoses in the younger population could partly be due to the rising opioid epidemic and intravenous drug use. Using hepatic venous portal gradient (HVPG) and liver stiffness tests, this study investigates better early diagnostic markers in identifying cirrhosis-related complications compared to percutaneous liver biopsy in hepatitis C patients. Scholarly journal articles were surveyed using PubMed and MeSH terms. Articles published more than 15 years ago were excluded. Various databases from the New England Journal of Medicine and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were also referenced to support the hypothesis. There is substantial affirmation from cohort and clinical studies that transient elastography and HVPG can indicate advancing chronic inflammatory and fibrotic stages of cirrhosis in comparison to liver biopsy. Additionally, they are helpful in predicting overall mortality from complications such as esophageal varices. The use of liver stiffness measurements and HVPG appears to be equivalent and/or superior to liver biopsy in assessing advancing cirrhosis. As hepatitis C cases continue to rise, it is crucial to search for alternative methods to better suit the needs of the patients and to improve their overall prognosis and potential treatments. Liver biopsy as the gold standard for cirrhosis assessment is questionable when less invasive instrumental tools are available in practice that have been shown to predict progressing fibrosis.

EUS-guided portal pressure measurement (with videos)

A growing number of studies have explored EUS-guided vascular catheterization due to the relative proximity of the gastrointestinal tract to the major blood vessels of the mediastinum and abdomen. In particular, EUS-guided access of the portal vein (PV) may be favorable given the relative difficulty of PV access through standard percutaneous routes. Two major diagnostic applications of EUS-guided vascular access include angiography and assessment of intravascular pressure. This review will outline the different devices and techniques employed to obtain angiographic visualization and/or direct pressure measurements of the portal circulation. Ease of access, safety, and important lessons learned from each approach will be highlighted.

VSL#3 ® probiotic therapy does not reduce portal pressures in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, bacterial translocation can contribute to splanchnic vasodilatation, decreased effective circulating volume, and portal hypertension. The primary objective of this randomized, double blind placebo controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of the probiotic VSL#3(®) on the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG).

METHODS

Seventeen patients with decompensated cirrhosis and an HVPG of ≥ 10 mmHg were randomized to receive 2 months of VSL#3(®) or an identical placebo. HVPG, endotoxin, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, renin, aldosterone, nitric oxide and stool microbiota were measured at baseline and study end.

RESULTS

Two of the 17 patients were taken off the trial before completion (one for alcohol abuse and the second for SBP - both in placebo arm). Data were analysed on the remaining 15 patients. The median model for end-stage liver disease score was 12, and 80% of patients had Child Pugh B disease. The treatment arm had a greater decrease in HVPG from baseline to study end than the placebo arm (median change from baseline -11.6% vs +2.8%), although this reduction was not statistically significant in either group. There was a significant reduction in the plasma aldosterone level in the VSL#3(®) group, but no significant changes in the other measured parameters, including the stool microflora analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of our sample size, VSL#3(®) therapy does not appear to have a significant impact on portal pressure reduction in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.