1
|
Singh B, Kumar S, Elangovan A, Vasht D, Arya S, Duc NT, Swami P, Pawar GS, Raju D, Krishna H, Sathee L, Dalal M, Sahoo RN, Chinnusamy V. Phenomics based prediction of plant biomass and leaf area in wheat using machine learning approaches. Front Plant Sci 2023; 14:1214801. [PMID: 37448870 PMCID: PMC10337996 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1214801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Phenomics has emerged as important tool to bridge the genotype-phenotype gap. To dissect complex traits such as highly dynamic plant growth, and quantification of its component traits over a different growth phase of plant will immensely help dissect genetic basis of biomass production. Based on RGB images, models have been developed to predict biomass recently. However, it is very challenging to find a model performing stable across experiments. In this study, we recorded RGB and NIR images of wheat germplasm and Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs) of Raj3765xHD2329, and examined the use of multimodal images from RGB, NIR sensors and machine learning models to predict biomass and leaf area non-invasively. Results The image-based traits (i-Traits) containing geometric features, RGB based indices, RGB colour classes and NIR features were categorized into architectural traits and physiological traits. Total 77 i-Traits were selected for prediction of biomass and leaf area consisting of 35 architectural and 42 physiological traits. We have shown that different biomass related traits such as fresh weight, dry weight and shoot area can be predicted accurately from RGB and NIR images using 16 machine learning models. We applied the models on two consecutive years of experiments and found that measurement accuracies were similar suggesting the generalized nature of models. Results showed that all biomass-related traits could be estimated with about 90% accuracy but the performance of model BLASSO was relatively stable and high in all the traits and experiments. The R2 of BLASSO for fresh weight prediction was 0.96 (both year experiments), for dry weight prediction was 0.90 (Experiment 1) and 0.93 (Experiment 2) and for shoot area prediction 0.96 (Experiment 1) and 0.93 (Experiment 2). Also, the RMSRE of BLASSO for fresh weight prediction was 0.53 (Experiment 1) and 0.24 (Experiment 2), for dry weight prediction was 0.85 (Experiment 1) and 0.25 (Experiment 2) and for shoot area prediction 0.59 (Experiment 1) and 0.53 (Experiment 2). Discussion Based on the quantification power analysis of i-Traits, the determinants of biomass accumulation were found which contains both architectural and physiological traits. The best predictor i-Trait for fresh weight and dry weight prediction was Area_SV and for shoot area prediction was projected shoot area. These results will be helpful for identification and genetic basis dissection of major determinants of biomass accumulation and also non-invasive high throughput estimation of plant growth during different phenological stages can identify hitherto uncovered genes for biomass production and its deployment in crop improvement for breaking the yield plateau.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biswabiplab Singh
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Sudhir Kumar
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Allimuthu Elangovan
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Devendra Vasht
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Sunny Arya
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Nguyen Trung Duc
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
- Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Pooja Swami
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Godawari Shivaji Pawar
- Division of Agricultural Botany, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, India
| | - Dhandapani Raju
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Hari Krishna
- Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Lekshmy Sathee
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Monika Dalal
- ICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India
| | - Rabi Narayan Sahoo
- Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Viswanathan Chinnusamy
- Division of Plant Physiology and Nanaji Deshmukh Plant Phenomics Centre (NDPPC), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li B, Chen L, Sun W, Wu D, Wang M, Yu Y, Chen G, Yang W, Lin Z, Zhang X, Duan L, Yang X. Phenomics-based GWAS analysis reveals the genetic architecture for drought resistance in cotton. Plant Biotechnol J 2020; 18:2533-2544. [PMID: 32558152 PMCID: PMC7680548 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Drought resistance (DR) is a complex trait that is regulated by a variety of genes. Without comprehensive profiling of DR-related traits, the knowledge of the genetic architecture for DR in cotton remains limited. Thus, there is a need to bridge the gap between genomics and phenomics. In this study, an automatic phenotyping platform (APP) was systematically applied to examine 119 image-based digital traits (i-traits) during drought stress at the seedling stage, across a natural population of 200 representative upland cotton accessions. Some novel i-traits, as well as some traditional i-traits, were used to evaluate the DR in cotton. The phenomics data allowed us to identify 390 genetic loci by genome-wide association study (GWAS) using 56 morphological and 63 texture i-traits. DR-related genes, including GhRD2, GhNAC4, GhHAT22 and GhDREB2, were identified as candidate genes by some digital traits. Further analysis of candidate genes showed that Gh_A04G0377 and Gh_A04G0378 functioned as negative regulators for cotton drought response. Based on the combined digital phenotyping, GWAS analysis and transcriptome data, we conclude that the phenomics dataset provides an excellent resource to characterize key genetic loci with an unprecedented resolution which can inform future genome-based breeding for improved DR in cotton.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baoqi Li
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementNational Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Lin Chen
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementNational Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Weinan Sun
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementNational Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Di Wu
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural BioinformaticsHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
- College of EngineeringHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Maojun Wang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementNational Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Yu Yu
- Cotton InstituteXinjiang Academy of Agriculture and Reclamation ScienceShiheziXinjiangChina
| | - Guoxing Chen
- MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze RiverHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Wanneng Yang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementNational Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural BioinformaticsHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Zhongxu Lin
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementNational Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Xianlong Zhang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementNational Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Lingfeng Duan
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural BioinformaticsHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
- College of EngineeringHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| | - Xiyan Yang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic ImprovementNational Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanHubeiChina
| |
Collapse
|