Gel Rolls Increase Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Radiation Exposure

Introduction: Despite increasing interest in reducing radiation doses during endoscopic stone surgery, there is conflicting evidence as to whether percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) positioning (prone or supine) impacts radiation. We observed clinically that a patient placed prone on gel rolls had higher than expected radiation with intraoperative CT imaging and that gel rolls were visible on the coaxial imaging. We hypothesized that gel rolls directly increase radiation doses. Methods: Anthropomorphic experiments to simulate PCNL positions were performed using a robotic multiplanar fluoroscopy system (Artis Zeego Care+Clear, Siemens) and a 5-second coaxial imaging protocol (5s BODY). A fluoroscopy phantom was placed in various positions, including prone on a gel roll; prone on blankets of equal thickness; prone and supine directly on the table; and modified supine (MS) positions using a thin gel roll or rolled blanket. Impacts of C-arm direction and use of a 1 L saline bag were also evaluated. Measured dose area product (DAP) was compared for the groups. Results: Measured DAP was found to increase by 146 μGy*m2 (287%) when prone on gel rolls compared with only 62.29 (23%) when placed on blankets of equal thickness, although the model likely both overstates the relative impact and understates the absolute impact that would be seen clinically. Measured DAP between experimental groups also varied considerably despite fluoroscopy time being held constant. Conclusions: Our experiments support our hypothesis that gel rolls directly increase radiation dose, which has not been previously reported, using an anthropomorphic model. Surgeons should consider radiolucent materials for positioning to limit radiation exposure to patients and the surgical team.

Ultralow-Dose Intraoperative Computed Tomography During Endoscopic Stone Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project

Objectives: To improve care in patients with large kidney stones using advanced intraoperative imaging techniques to reduce perioperative radiation exposure, improve stone-free rates (SFRs), and reduce the number of surgical interventions in a quality improvement project. Patients and Methods: Patients with kidney stones appropriate for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) treatment were scheduled into a hybrid operating room for endoscopic surgery (PCNL and/or ureteroscopy) with intent to perform intraoperative CT (ICT). Imaging was performed using an Artis Zeego Care+Clear™ (Siemens) robotic-armed multiplanar fluoroscopy system with collimation to the level of the affected kidney(s). After the initial case, the proprietary CARE™ (combined applications to reduce exposure) protocol was used. When the hybrid room was unavailable, a mobile CT scanner (O-Arm; Medtronics) was used in the traditional room (n = 2). Results: Thirty-one ICTs were performed in 23 consecutive patients during endoscopic stone procedures with a median effective radiation dose of 1.39 mSv per scan, significantly less than the preoperative noncontrast CT (12.02 mSv) in the same patients (p < 0.001). Longitudinal radiation exposure associated with stone treatment significantly decreased by 83% (15.80 to 2.68 mSv, p < 0.001) compared with a similar historical PCNL cohort. Clinically significant residual stones (≥3 mm) were identified at initial ICT in eight patients (35%) and further treated in six patients. One patient had missed residual stone diagnosed 34 days after surgery, which was apparent on re-review of the ICT. Thus, final verified SFR was 87% for all stages. Mean number of procedures improved from 1.77 to 1.30 (p = 0.05) and rate of postoperative CT scans improved from 82% to 26% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Ultralow-dose ICT was demonstrated to simultaneously improve SFR and number of staged treatments, and greatly reduce the perioperative radiation dose for our patients. The findings support the continued use of this modality to benefit all patients with large stones.

Cervical Spine Fracture with Extreme Dislocation in a Patient with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a seronegative arthropathy which results in pathological ossification of the ligaments, disc, endplates and apophyseal structures. Cervical spinal fractures are more common in patients with ankylosing spondylitis than in patients without ankylosing spondylitis due to coexistent osteoporosis and kyphotic alignment of the spine. The risk of fracture-dislocation and associated spinal cord injury is also more in these patients. Management of cervical spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is more challenging.

Case Description

We report a 56-year-old male patient who presented to our emergency department following a road traffic accident. He had ASIA B spinal cord injury at C7 level. CT scan revealed a C6-7 fracture-dislocation with features suggestive of AS. The fracture involved all the three columns and extended through C7 body anteriorly and through the C6-7 disc posteriorly. The treating team was not aware that he had AS, and thus, precautions related to his head position were not taken. He underwent reduction of the fracture-dislocation and 360° fixation.

Conclusions

The management of cervical spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is challenging. They need long segment fixation in their preoperative spinal alignment. Proper preoperative planning can result in good outcome.

Intraoperative computed tomography of a resected lung inflated with air to verify safety surgical margin

Background

During sublobar resection for small, indistinct lung cancer, surgeons may be uncertain as to whether or not the target lesion has been resected and the surgical margin is sufficient. We herein report our procedure for confirming the success of sublobar resection without incising the resected specimen.

Methods

We reviewed our initial experience of 12 patients with intrapulmonary lesions (consolidation diameter ≤1 cm) who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection using autostapler. Six patients had primary adenocarcinoma showing part solid lesion, and remaining six patients had metastatic carcinoma showing purely solid lesion. Intraoperatively, the resected specimen was inflated with air and subjected to computed tomography (CT). The maximum tumor diameter and surgical margin length were measured intraoperatively on CT and postoperatively on formalin-fixed specimen. Surgical stump cytology was also done to verify surgical margin.

Results

According to the intraoperative CT, complete resection was confirmed in all patients. The intraoperative CT-based maximum tumor diameter closely correlated with the macroscopically measured one (r=0.971, P<0.0001). However, the tumor shrunk after formalin-fixation by 16.0% in patients with primary lung cancer (P<0.01), but not in patients with metastatic lung cancer. The intraoperative CT-based margin length closely correlated with the macroscopically measured one (r=0.984, P<0.0001). However, the margin shrunk after formalin-fixation in both patients with primary lung cancer and metastatic lung cancer, by 15.1% and 15.7%, respectively. Stump cytology was negative in all patients. Consequently, no recurrence was found during postoperative follow-up of 23 months (range, 14-31 months).

Conclusions

Intraoperative CT is reliable for diagnosing the presence of a target lesion within the resected specimen as well as for estimating the surgical margin length in patients undergoing sublobar resection for intrapulmonary indistinct lesions.

Workflow and performance of intraoperative CT, cone-beam CT, and robotic cone-beam CT for spinal navigation in 503 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

A direct comparison of intraoperative CT (iCT), cone-beam CT (CBCT), and robotic cone-beam CT (rCBCT) has been necessary to identify the ideal imaging solution for each individual user's need. Herein, the authors sought to analyze workflow, handling, and performance of iCT, CBCT, and rCBCT imaging for navigated pedicle screw instrumentation across the entire spine performed within the same surgical environment by the same group of surgeons.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018, 503 consecutive patients received 2673 navigated pedicle screws using iCT (n = 1219), CBCT (n = 646), or rCBCT (n = 808) imaging during the first 24 months after the acquisition of each modality. Clinical and demographic data, workflow, handling, and screw assessment and accuracy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Intraoperative CT showed image quality and workflow advantages for cervicothoracic cases, obese patients, and long-segment instrumentation, whereas CBCT and rCBCT offered independent handling, around-the-clock availability, and the option of performing 2D fluoroscopy. All modalities permitted reliable intraoperative screw assessment. Navigated screw revision was possible with each modality and yielded final accuracy rates > 92% in all groups (iCT 96.2% vs CBCT 92.3%, p < 0.001) without a difference in the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement or the rate of secondary screw revision surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous training and an individual setup of iCT, CBCT, and rCBCT has been shown to permit safe and precise navigated posterior instrumentation across the entire spine with reliable screw assessment and the option of immediate revision. The perceived higher image quality and larger scan area of iCT should be weighed against the around-the-clock availability of CBCT and rCBCT technology with the option of single-handed robotic image acquisition.

[Intraoperative computed tomography and modern navigation in surgical treatment of spine and spinal cord diseases]

Surgical treatment of spine and spinal cord diseases is one of important objectives in modern neurosurgery. Patient safety is a priority in spine and spinal cord surgery. Intraoperative imaging ensures efficacy and safe surgery with and without stabilization, preoperative marking, control of decompression and correct implant placement. Surgical C-arms and intraoperative cone-beam CT scanners are the most widespread in everyday practice. The latest achievement was intraoperative spiral computed tomography. C-arms and CT scanners with intraoperative navigation increase the efficiency and safety of surgical interventions.

Radiation Exposure in Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of CT Image-Guided Navigation, Robotic Assistance, and Intraoperative Fluoroscopy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical review.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) image-guided navigation (IGN) and robotic assistance in posterior lumbar surgery and their relationship with patient radiation exposure and perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years old undergoing 1- to 2-level transforaminal lateral interbody fusion in 12-month period were included. Chart review was performed for pre- and intraoperative data on radiation dose and perioperative outcomes. All radiation doses are quantified in milliGrays (mGy). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were utilized for categorical variables. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test was used for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were assessed: 12 IGN, 62 robotic, 56 open, 35 fluoroscopically guided minimally invasive surgery (MIS). There was a lower proportion of women in open and MIS groups (P = .010). There were more younger patients in the MIS group (P < .001). MIS group had the lowest mean posterior levels fused (P = .015). Total-procedure radiation, total-procedure radiation/level fused, and intraoperative radiation was the lowest in the open group and highest in the MIS group compared with IGN and robotic groups (all P < .001). Higher proportion of robotic and lower proportion of MIS patients had preoperative CT (P < .001). Estimated blood loss (P = .002) and hospital length of stay (P = .039) were lowest in the MIS group. Highest operative time was observed for IGN patients (P < .001). No differences were observed in body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and postoperative complications (P = .313, .051, and .644, respectively).

CONCLUSION

IGN and robotic assistance in posterior lumbar fusion were associated with higher intraoperative and total-procedure radiation exposure than open cases without IGN/robotics, but significantly less than MIS without IGN/robotics, without differences in perioperative outcomes. Fluoro-MIS procedures reported highest radiation exposure to patient, and of equal concern is that the proportion of total radiation dose also applied to the surgeon and operating room staff in fluoro-MIS group is higher than in IGN/robotics and open groups.

Elastic Image Fusion Software to Coregister Preoperatively Planned Pedicle Screws With Intraoperative Computed Tomography Data for Image-Guided Spinal Surgery

BACKGROUND

For complex spinal cases, especially when robotic guidance is used, preoperative planning of pedicle screws can be helpful. Transfer of these preoperatively planned pedicle screws to intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging is challenging because of changes in anatomic alignment between preoperative supine and intraoperative prone imaging, especially when multiple levels are involved. In the spine, where each individual vertebra is subject to independent movement from adjacent level, rigid image fusion is confined to a single vertebra and can display fusion inaccuracies on adjacent levels. A novel elastic fusion algorithm is introduced to overcome these disadvantages. This study aimed to investigate image registration accuracy of preoperatively planned pedicle screws with an elastic fusion algorithm vs. rigid fusion for intraoperative placement with image-guided surgery.

METHODS

A total of 12 patients, were selected depending on the availability of a preoperative spinal computed tomography (CT) and an intraoperative AIRO CT scan (BrainLAB AG, Munich, Germany) of the same spinal region. To verify accuracy differences between rigid fusion and elastic fusion 76 bilateral screw trajectories were virtually defined in the preoperative CT image, and they were transferred via either rigid fusion or elastic fusion to the intraoperative CT scan. Accuracy of the transferred screws in the rigid and elastic fusion group was determined by measuring pedicle breaches on the intraoperative CT.

RESULTS

In the rigid fusion group 1.3% of screws showed a breach of less than 2 mm, 9.2% showed breaches between 2 and 4 mm, and 18.4% of the screws showed an error above 4 mm. The elastic fusion group showed no breaches and provided high accuracy between preoperative and intraoperative screw placement.

CONCLUSION

Elastic fusion provides high registration accuracy and represents a considerable step towards efficiency and safety in CT-based image-guided surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Is the Implant in Bone? The Accuracy of CT and Fluoroscopic Imaging for Detecting Malpositioned Pelvic Screw and SI Fusion Implants

BACKGROUND

Spine fusions to the pelvis have been associated with increased strain to the sacroiliac joint (SI) and possibly continued postoperative low back pain. To minimize this, concomitant SI joint fusion at the time of lumbopelvic fixation has been advocated. This requires concomitant placement of sacral alar iliac screws (S2AI) for lumbopelvic fixation and triangular titanium rods (TTR) for the SI joint fusion. Traditionally, surgeons have mostly relied on fluoroscopic images to confirm final implant position and patient safety after pelvic instrumentation, although computer tomography (CT) has also been used.

METHODS

We wanted to know which imaging modality, if any, was superior in helping to identify malpositioned implants during concomitant lumbopelvic fixation and SI joint fusion. We instrumented pelvic sawbones models with S2AI screws, TTR's, or both in the correct anatomic positions or malpositioned variants that led to known cortical breaches. Pelvic models were then imaged with fluoroscopy and CT, and the images assessed by blinded reviewers (spine surgeons and a musculoskeletal radiologist) for the presence of cortical breaches, the identity of the breached implant, and its direction. The responses of the blinded reviewers were then compared to the known position of the implants and Kappa coefficient calculated to determine agreement.

RESULTS

We found that thorough evaluation of implant position with multiple fluoroscopic views (kappa 0.641) or CT imaging (kappa 0.906) allowed reviewers to assess implant position, identity, and breach direction.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that intraoperative CT imaging allows surgeons to make the best decision regarding implant position prior to leaving the operating room, thus potentially improving patient safety and unplanned returns to the operating room.Level of Evidence: V.

Retrospective analysis of pedicle screw accuracy for patients undergoing spinal surgery assisted by intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scanner AIRO® and BrainLab© navigation

Minimally invasive spine surgery techniques for pedicle screw instrumentation are being more frequently used. They offer shorter operative times, shorter hospital stays for patients, faster recovery, less blood loss, and less damage to surrounding tissues. However, they may rely heavily on fluoroscopic imaging, and confer radiation exposure to the surgeon and team members. Use of the AIRO Mobile Intraoperative CT by Brainlab during surgery is a way to eliminate radiation exposure to staff and may improve accuracy rates for pedicle screw instrumentation. We designed a retrospective analysis of our first 12 patients who had a total of 59 pedicle screws inserted when we began to incorporate the AIRO iCT scanner to our surgical workflow. During pedicle screw insertion, projection images were saved, and compared to CT scans gone at the end of the case. We measured the distances between the projected and postprocedural screw locations, at both the screw tips and tulip heads. We observed a mean of 2.8 mm difference between the projection and postprocedural images. None of the screws inserted had any clinically significant complications, and no patient required revision surgery. Overall, iCT guided navigation with the AIRO system is a safe adjunct to spinal surgery. It decreased operator and staff radiation exposure, and helped facilitate successful MIS surgery without fluoroscopic imaging. Additional studies and research can be done to further improve accuracy and reliability.

Evolving Navigation, Robotics, and Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Innovative technology and techniques have revolutionized minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) within the past decade. The introduction of navigation and image-guided surgery has greatly affected spinal surgery and will continue to make surgery safer and more efficient. Eventually, it is conceivable that fluoroscopy will be completely replaced with image guidance. These advancements, among others such as robotics and virtual and augmented reality technology, will continue to drive the value of 3-dimensional navigation in MIS. In this review, we cover pertinent features of navigation in MIS and explore their evolution over time. Moreover, we aim to discuss the key features germane to surgical advancement, including technique and technology development, accuracy, overall health care costs, operating room time efficiency, and radiation exposure.

Assessing the Intraoperative Risk of Esophageal Perforation during Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Study Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography

Introduction

Using intraoperative computed tomography (iCT), we aimed to clarify the course of the esophagus and pharynx during anterior cervical spine surgery to estimate the risk of intraoperative injury.

Methods

Sixteen patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery with intraoperative CT for registration of a navigation system without release of blade retraction were included. To investigate the status of the retracted esophagus and pharynx, the distance between the nasogastric tube and center of the vertebra (NVD) was measured at each disc and vertebral level (C4-7) using axial CT. The location of the cricoid cartilage, which may affect the shift of the esophagus and pharynx, was noted. Presence or absence of contact between the esophagus and the edge of the surgical blade was investigated.

Results

The NVDs were 28.0, 28.3, 28.9, 27.2, 24.7, 19.9, and 13.8 mm at C4, C4/5, C5, C5/6, C6, C6/7, and C7, respectively; NVDs at C6/7 or more caudal levels were significantly shorter than those at C6 or more cranial levels (P < 0.001). The cricoid cartilage was observed at the C4-C5/6 level. Esophageal contact with the edge of the blade was observed in nine cases at C6 or more caudal levels.

Conclusions

The esophagus, which was placed at C6 or more caudal levels, was directly retracted by the blade. Nevertheless, the pharynx, which was placed at C6 or more cranial levels, was mostly retracted with the cricoid cartilage. Thus, the risk of direct esophageal injury was higher at C6 or more caudal levels than at cranial levels.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Brain Stimulation-A Prospective Noninferiority Study

Introduction

Clinical response to deep brain stimulation (DBS) strongly depends on the appropriate placement of the electrode in the targeted structure. Postoperative MRI is recognized as the gold standard to verify the DBS‐electrode position in relation to the intended anatomical target. However, intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) might be a feasible alternative to MRI.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective noninferiority study, we compared iCT with postoperative MRI (24‐72 hours after surgery) in 29 consecutive patients undergoing placement of 58 DBS electrodes. The primary outcome was defined as the difference in Euclidean distance between lead tip coordinates as determined on both imaging modalities, using the lead tip depicted on MRI as reference. Secondary outcomes were difference in radial error and depth, as well as difference in accuracy relative to target.

Results

The mean difference between the lead tips was 0.98 ± 0.49 mm (0.97 ± 0.47 mm for the left‐sided electrodes and 1.00 ± 0.53 mm for the right‐sided electrodes). The upper confidence interval (95% CI, 0.851 to 1.112) did not exceed the noninferiority margin established. The average radial error between lead tips was 0.74 ± 0.48 mm and the average depth error was determined to be 0.53 ± 0.40 mm. The linear Deming regression indicated a good agreement between both imaging modalities regarding accuracy relative to target.

Conclusions

Intraoperative CT is noninferior to MRI for the verification of the DBS‐electrode position. CT and MRI have their specific benefits, but both should be considered equally suitable for assessing accuracy.

A cold spot compensation technique using a combination of trans-rectal ultrasonography and intraoperative computed tomography for interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy: a single-arm prospective trial

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of a cold spot compensation technique using a combination of trans-rectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and computed tomography (CT) for permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Sixty-five patients were treated with the cold spot compensation technique using TRUS-CT fusion. The prescribed dose was set at 145 Gy. The dose to 90% of prostate volume (D₉₀) was planned to be within 195 Gy (134%) and 205 Gy (141%). After implantation using the conventional technique, additional seeds were implanted if cold spots were detected on TRUS-CT fusion images.

Results

Cold spots were detected in 32 of 65 patients (49%) and were compensated by additional seeds. Median number of additional seeds was 3 (range, 1-5). A CT scan 1 month later revealed that the percentage of patients receiving an undesirably low D₉₀ (160-180 Gy) was significantly reduced in the examination arm compared to historical controls. However, mean operation time was significantly longer in the examination arm (64 min) than in historical controls (49 min, p < 0.001). With median follow-up of 18 months (range, 9-24 months), no grade 3 or worse toxicity was encountered.

Conclusion

The cold spot compensation technique using TRUS-CT fusion appears effective for patients receiving permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography Navigation During Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Small-sized Lung Tumors

Performance of thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy for primary lung cancer or pulmonary metastases has recently increased. In patients with emphysema, identification of the intersegmental line is often difficult. For nonpalpable lesions, securing a sufficient surgical margin is more likely to be uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scan during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary segmentectomy. This study included 12 patients who underwent intraoperative CT-assisted VATS segmentectomy between January 2015 and August 2016. After dividing the corresponding vessels and bronchi, the intersegmental line was marked by clipping, and intraoperative CT scan was performed under bilateral lung ventilation. The intraoperative CT or 3-dimensional CT reconstruction images were used by the surgeons to confirm the correct anatomical segmental border and to secure a sufficient resection margin. In all patients, the location of the lesions to be resected, the intersegmental border, and the surgical margins could be confirmed while performing VATS segmentectomy. Complete resection was achieved in all patients. Although the pathologic margins tended to be shorter than the surgical margins on intraoperative CT images, there was a strong correlation between these 2 variables (r = 0.963, P < 0.0001). Intraoperative CT scan during VATS segmentectomy was useful for identifying the location of nonpalpable lesions, confirming anatomical intersegmental borders and securing the resection margins. Intraoperative CT navigation could enable a more definitive VATS segmentectomy for nonpalpable lesions.

Spinal navigation for posterior instrumentation of C1-2 instability using a mobile intraoperative CT scanner

OBJECTIVE Spinal navigation techniques for surgical fixation of unstable C1-2 pathologies are challenged by complex osseous and neurovascular anatomy, instability of the pathology, and unreliable preoperative registration techniques. An intraoperative CT scanner with autoregistration of C-1 and C-2 promises sufficient accuracy of spinal navigation without the need for further registration procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and reliability of posterior C1-2 fixation using intraoperative mobile CT scanner-guided navigation. METHODS In the period from July 2014 to February 2016, 10 consecutive patients with instability of C1-2 underwent posterior fixation using C-2 pedicle screws and C-1 lateral mass screws, and 2 patients underwent posterior fixation from C-1 to C-3. Spinal navigation was performed using intraoperative mobile CT. Following navigated screw insertion in C-1 and C-2, intraoperative CT was repeated to check for the accuracy of screw placement. In this study, the accuracy of screw positioning was retrospectively analyzed and graded by an independent observer. RESULTS The authors retrospectively analyzed the records of 10 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 80.7 ± 4.95 years (range 42-90 years). Unstable pathologies, which were verified by fracture dislocation or by flexion/extension radiographs, included 8 Anderson Type II fractures, 1 unstable Anderson Type III fracture, 1 hangman fracture Levine Effendi Ia, 1 complex hangman-Anderson Type III fracture, and 1 destructive rheumatoid arthritis of C1-2. In 4 patients, critical anatomy was observed: high-riding vertebral artery (3 patients) and arthritis-induced partial osseous destruction of the C-1 lateral mass (1 patient). A total of 48 navigated screws were placed. Correct screw positioning was observed in 47 screws (97.9%). Minor pedicle breach was observed in 1 screw (2.1%). No screw displacement occurred (accuracy rate 97.9%). CONCLUSION Spinal navigation using intraoperative mobile CT scanning was reliable and safe for posterior fixation in unstable C1-2 pathologies with high accuracy in this patient series.

Case Report: Simultaneous Localization and Removal of Lung Nodules Through Extended Use of the Hybrid Suite

The ability to attain high-definition imaging for preoperative planning, intraoperative execution, and postoperative evaluation is instrumental in surgical practice. Hybrid room computed tomography (CT) allows for faster, less invasive diagnostic and therapeutic options for patients. We present our diagnostic workup and therapeutic intervention with hybrid CT imaging in a 71-year-old female with a growing lung nodule after previous lobectomy for lung cancer.

Dosimetry of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy for an interoperative procedure, using O-arm based CT and TRUS

Purpose

The aim of this report is dosimetric evaluation for an intraoperative fusion computed tomography (CT) as a superior predictor of 1-month CT based dosimetry in comparison to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Data of 65 patients treated with seed implantation were analyzed. All procedures has been performed with patients in the lithotomy position inside the O-arm system. An end-fine probe is used as a landmark to fuse TRUS and O-arm-based CT images. There was no difference in the patient's position, probe position, and timing of image acquisition between the two imaging modalities. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters such as the dose to 90% of prostate volume (D₉₀) has been analyzed.

Results

The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic tended to be larger on fusion CT than on TRUS for most DVH parameters (71.85% vs. 59.59% for D₉₀; p = 0.07). Significant relationships between fusion CT and 1-month CT were confirmed using Pearson's correlation coefficients for most DVH parameters (R = 0.48, p < 0.01 for D₉₀), although the relationship between TRUS and 1-month CT was poor. Large dose reduction (35 Gy for D₉₀) was seen from TRUS to fusion CT, especially in patients with high body weight and small prostate volume.

Conclusions

Intraoperative fusion CT appears to have higher predictive power for 1-month CT-based dosimetry than TRUS. A prospective trial using fusion CT-based planning is warranted.