[Patient first - The impact of characteristics of target populations on decisions about therapy effectiveness of complex interventions: Psychological variables to assess effectiveness in interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy]

INTRODUCTION

The assessment of treatment effectiveness in public health settings is ensured by indicators that reflect the changes caused by specific interventions. These indicators are also applied in benchmarking systems. The selection of constructs should be guided by their relevance for affected patients (patient reported outcomes). The interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) is a complex intervention based on a biopsychosocial understanding of chronic pain. For quality assurance purposes, psychological parameters (depression, general anxiety, health-related quality of life) are included in standardized therapy assessment in pain medicine (KEDOQ), which can also be used for comparative analyses in a benchmarking system. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relevance of depressive symptoms, general anxiety and mental quality of life in patients undergoing IMPT under real life conditions.

METHODS

In this retrospective, one-armed and exploratory observational study we used secondary data of a routine documentation of IMST in routine care, applying several variables of the German Pain Questionnaire and the facility's comprehensive basic documentation. 352 participants with IMPT (from 2006 to 2010) were included, and the follow-up was performed over two years with six assessments. Because of statistically heterogeneous characteristics a complex analysis consisting of factor and cluster analyses was applied to build subgroups. These subgroups were explored to identify differences in depressive symptoms (HADS-D), general anxiety (HADS-A), and mental quality of life (SF 36 PSK) at the time of therapy admission and their development estimated by means of effect sizes. Analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0®.

RESULTS

Six subgroups were derived and mainly proved to be clinically and psychologically normal, with the exception of one subgroup that consistently showed psychological impairment for all three parameters. The follow-up of the total study population revealed medium or large effects; changes in the subgroups were consistently caused by two subgroups, while the other four showed little or no change. In summary, only a small proportion of the target population (20 %) demonstrated clinically relevant scores in the psychological parameters applied.

DISCUSSION

When selecting indicators for quality assurance, the heterogeneity of the target populations as well as conceptual and methodological aspects should be considered. The characteristics of the parameters intended, along with clinical and personal relevance of indicators for patients, should be investigated by specific procedures such as patient surveys and statistical analyses.

Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity

Context and implementation of health interventions have received increasing attention over the past decade, in particular with respect to their influence on the effectiveness and reach of complex interventions. The underlying concepts are both considered partially mature, limiting their operationalization in research and practice. We conducted systematic literature searches and pragmatic utility (PU) concept analyses to provide a state-of-the-art assessment of the concepts of "context" and "implementation" in the health sciences to create a common understanding for their use within systematic reviews and HTA. We performed two separate searches, one for context (EMBASE, MEDLINE) and the other for implementation (Google Scholar) to identify relevant models, theories and frameworks. 17 publications on context and 35 articles on implementation met our inclusion criteria. PU concept analysis comprises three guiding principles: selection of the literature, organization and structuring of the literature, and asking analytic questions of the literature. Both concepts were analyzed according to four features of conceptual maturity, i.e., consensual definitions, clear characteristics, fully described preconditions and outcomes, and delineated boundaries. Context and implementation are highly intertwined, with both concepts influencing and interacting with each other. Context is defined as a set of characteristics and circumstances that surround the implementation effort. Implementation is conceptualized as a planned and deliberately initiated effort with the intention to put an intervention into practice. The concept of implementation presents largely consensual definitions and relatively well-defined boundaries, while distinguishing features, preconditions and outcomes are not yet fully articulated. In contrast, definitions of context vary widely, and boundaries with neighbouring concepts, such as setting and environment, are blurred; characteristics, preconditions and outcomes are ill-defined. Therefore, the maturity of both concepts should be further improved to facilitate operationalization in systematic reviews and HTAs.

[Potential analysis for research on Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) for persons with dementia living in long-term care facilities]

HEALTH PROBLEM

The nursing Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0) and other nursing quality indices summarise relevant health and nursing outcomes for long-term care that are recommended as quality measures. These are measures like "Percent of High-Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers", "Percent of Low-Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowels or Bladder", "Percent of Residents Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury", "Percent of Residents Who Lose Too Much Weight" etc. Analyses of healthcare data in Germany showed a substantial higher risk for negative outcomes in the long-term care setting in persons with dementia compared to persons without dementia. There already exist evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for most of the quality measures and underlying health problems (e.g., the German "Expertenstandards in der Pflege"). Implementation and translation of evidence have not been systematically researched yet, and there is uncertainty about structures and processes that support implementation and eventually lead to improved nursing outcomes in people with dementia in long-term care.

CORPUS OF EVIDENCE

Studies showed a potential benefit of master-level geriatric advanced practice nurses (GAPNs) concerning the implementation of evidence-based guidelines. This corresponds to the expectation that academic nursing staff positively influences research utilisation in practice. A systematic review identified four controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of GAPN on select quality measures. Both the internal and external validity of the trials require a thorough investigation into the intervention before translation and effectiveness research in Germany can be recommended.

IMPLICATION FOR RESEARCH

In accordance with national and international recommendations on the development and clinical evaluation of complex interventions, we recommend a multistage model. Such a model comprises the conceptualisation and adaptation of the original intervention. In this way, the original concept of a GAPN has to be translated into the context of the German healthcare system. Furthermore, feasibility of the intervention in general has to be investigated. This includes acceptance of GAPNs in practice and the necessary prerequisites, especially concerning a comprehensive commitment of one APN to more than one long-term care facility.

[Development, application and evaluation of nursing interventions for people with dementia in nursing homes in Germany--a literature review]

In 2007 guidelines for the care of people with dementia living in nursing homes, especially for handling challenging behaviour, have been published that recommend certain interventions. The aim of this study is a systematic review of publications about projects and the development and utilisation of interventions recommended in the German guideline in German nursing homes. For this purpose, 22 publications from 8 projects were analysed. The analysis was carried out on the basis of the CReDECI-criteria for the reporting of complex interventions. The publications described the application of reminiscence-therapy, Snoezelen, Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) and the use of understanding diagnostics as well as assessment instruments. Although the interventions were based on similar theoretical frames and had the same aim they contained different components. For the implementation a considerably amount of teaching and support by the project members was needed. A process evaluation as well as information about necessary adaptations to general conditions was given seldom. Partly, information that is important for the use in practice as well as in continuative studies is missing in the publications.