1
|
Wang Z, Chen H, Chen Q, Zhu Y, Li M, Zhou J. Multi-institutional study of 'Sandwich treatment' for motor area large brain metastases (LBM) with diameter over 3 cm. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58:145-152. [PMID: 38183280 PMCID: PMC10878778 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2024-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of the present study was to explore the effectiveness and safety of 'Sandwich treatment' strategy for large brain metastases (LBM) with diameter over 3 cm (minimum volume >= 15 cm3) located in motor area. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients from four gamma knife center that received 'Sandwich treatment' were retrospectively studied from January 2016 to March 2023. The strategy was one-week treatment course including 2 stages of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and using bevacizumab once during SRS gap. The tumor volume and peri-tumor edema changes were analyzed before and after 'Sandwich treatment'. Manual muscle testing (MMT) score and Barthel Index (BI) score were used to evaluate the changes of patients' movement and physical strength rehabilitation. The patients' overall survival (OS) and tumor local control (TLC) rate was calculated. Cox regression model was used to analyze the risk factors that related to TLC. RESULTS 61 patients with 72 lesions received the 'Sandwich treatment'. The median prescription dose was 13.0 Gy and 12.5 Gy at the first- and second-stage SRS. The mean tumor volume at the time of 'Sandwich treatment' and 3 months later was 20.1 cm3 and 12.3, respectively (P < 0.01). The mean peri-tumor edema volume at the first- and second-stage SRS was 12.6 cm3 and 5.2 cm3, respectively (P < 0.01). Patients' median MMT score improved from 6 at the beginning to 8 at the end of 'Sandwich treatment' (P < 0.01), BI score was also greatly improved from 45 at the time of 'Sandwich treatment' to 95 after 3 months (P < 0.01). Patients' median OS was 14.0 months, and the 3, 6, 12 months OS rate was 92.0%, 86.0% and 66.0%, respectively. The TLC rate at 3, 6, 12 months was 98.4%, 93.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Patients with lung cancer had lower risk of tumor relapse. The cumulative incidence of patient's hemorrhage and radiation necrosis was 4.92% (3/61) and 13.11% (8/61) after 'Sandwich treatment'. CONCLUSIONS 'Sandwich treatment' strategy is safe and effective for LBM located in motor area. The strategy could rapidly improve the patients' movement and enhance their physical strength rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Wang
- Cancer Center, Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haining Chen
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Anhui Provincial Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Qun Chen
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center. Jiangsu Province People’s Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjing, China
| | - Yucun Zhu
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Ming ji Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Min Li
- Cancer Center, Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Zhou
- Cancer Center, Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vetlova ER, Banov SM, Golanov AV, Pronin IN, Antipina NA, Galkin MV. [Results of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for resected and intact large brain metastases]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko 2023; 87:67-75. [PMID: 38054229 DOI: 10.17116/neiro20238706167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Post-resection or isolated hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HF-SRT) is a therapeutic option for large brain metastases (>2 cm, LBMs). OBJECTIVE To compare the results of post-resection or isolated HF-SRT in patients with LBMs. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective study included 115 patients with 129 intact LBMs and 133 patients with 149 resected LBMs who underwent HF-SRT. Median baseline focal size was 22.5 and 28 mm, median target volume - 8.3 and 23.7 cm3, respectively. RESULTS Median follow-up was 13.9 months, median overall survival - 19.1 months. After 12 months, local recurrences developed in 17 and 31% of patients, respectively (p=0.0078). Local recurrence after 12 months developed in 23% of patients with residual tumor in postoperative cavity compared to 16% of patients after total resection (p=0.0073). After 12 months, incidence of leptomeningeal progression was 27 and 11%, respectively (p=0.033), incidence of symptomatic radiation-induced necrosis - 4 and 23%, respectively (p=0.0006). CONCLUSION Post-resection HF-SRT demonstrated better local control and less severe symptomatic radiation-induced necrosis compared to patients with intact LBMs. Incidence of leptomeningeal progression is significantly higher after resection of LBMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R Vetlova
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - S M Banov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Golanov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
| | - I N Pronin
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - M V Galkin
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moon HC, Park YS. Volume prediction for large brain metastases after hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery through artificial neural network. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30964. [PMID: 36221403 PMCID: PMC9542824 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The effectiveness of single-session gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for small metastatic brain tumors has been proven, but hypofractionated GKRS (hfGKRS) for large brain metastases (BM) from the linear quadratic (LQ) model is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to investigate volume changes large BM after hfGKRS from the LQ model and predict volume changes using artificial neural network (ANN). We retrospectively investigated the clinical findings of 28 patients who underwent hfGKRS with large BM (diameter >3 cm or volume >10 cc). A total of 44 tumors were extracted from 28 patients with features. We randomly divided 30 large brain tumors as training set and 14 large brain tumors as test set. To predict the volume changes after hfGKRS, we used ANN models (single-layer perceptron (SLP) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)). The volume reduction was 96% after hfGKRS for large BM from the LQ model. ANN model predicted volume changes with 70% and 80% accuracy for SLP and MLP, respectively. Even in large BM, hfGKRS from the LQ model could be a good treatment option. Additionally, the MLP model could predict volume changes with 80% accuracy after hfGKRS for large BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeong Cheol Moon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Icon Center, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Icon Center, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
- Department of Medical Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Young Seok Park, Department of Neurosurgery and Medical Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 776, 1 Sunhwan-ro, Gaesin-dong, Sewon-gu, Cheongju, Republic of Korea (e-mail address: )
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Damron EP, Dono A, Chafi H, Martir M, Yu TK, Khwaja S, Amsbaugh M, Tandon N, Esquenazi Y, Blanco AI. Metastatic Neoplasm Volume Kinetics Following Two-Staged Stereotactic Radiosurgery. World Neurosurg 2022:S1878-8750(22)00121-8. [PMID: 35123024 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multisession staged stereotactic radiosurgery (2-SSRS) represents an alternative approach for management of large brain metastases (LBMs), with potential advantages over fractionated SRS. We investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of 2-SSRS in patients with LBMs. METHODS LBMs patients treated with 2-SSRS between 2014-2020 were evaluated. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic information was obtained. Volumetric measurements at first SSRS, second SSRS, and follow-up imaging studies were obtained. Characteristics that might predict response to 2-SSRS were evaluated through Fischer-exact or Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with 26 LBMs were included in the study. Median marginal doses for first and second SSRS were 15 Gy (14-18 Gy) and 15 Gy (12-16 Gy), respectively. Median tumor volumes at first SSRS, second SSRS, and 3-month follow-up were 8.1 cm3 (1.5-28.5 cm3), 3.3 cm3 (0.8-26.1 cm3), and 2.2 cm3 (0.2-10.1 cm3), respectively. Overall, 24/26 lesions (92%) demonstrated early local control following the first SSRS with 17 lesions (71%) demonstrating a decrease of >30% in the T1 post-contrast MRI volume before the second SSRS and 3 lesions (12%) remaining stable. Eventually, four lesions showed disease progression after 2-SSRS. The median time to local progression was not reached and the median time to intracranial progression was 9.1 months. CONCLUSIONS Our study supports the effectiveness and safety of 2-SSRS as a treatment modality for patients with large, symptomatic brain metastases, especially in poor surgical candidates. The local failure rate and low occurrence of adverse effects are comparable to other staged radiosurgery studies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gutschenritter T, Venur VA, Combs SE, Vellayappan B, Patel AP, Foote M, Redmond KJ, Wang TJC, Sahgal A, Chao ST, Suh JH, Chang EL, Ellenbogen RG, Lo SS. The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Management of Large Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:cancers13010070. [PMID: 33383817 PMCID: PMC7795798 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Brain metastases are the most common cause of cancerous brain tumors in adults. Large brain metastases are an especially difficult clinical scenario as patients often have debilitating symptoms from these tumors, and large tumors are more difficult to control with traditional single treatment radiation regimens alone or after surgery. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is a novel way to deliver the higher doses of radiation to control large tumors either after surgery (most common), alone (common), or potentially before surgery (uncommon). Herein, we describe how delivering high doses over three or five treatments may improve tumor control and decrease complication rates compared to more traditional single treatment regimens for brain metastases larger than 2 cm in maximum dimension. Abstract Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignant tumor in adults and are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality for cancer patients. Large brain metastases, defined as tumors with a maximum dimension >2 cm, present a unique clinical challenge for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as patients often present with neurologic symptoms that require expeditious treatment that must also be balanced against the potential consequences of surgery and radiation therapy—namely, leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and radionecrosis (RN). Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and pre-operative SRS have emerged as novel treatment techniques to help improve local control rates and reduce rates of RN and LMD for this patient population commonly managed with post-operative SRS. Recent literature suggests that pre-operative SRS can potentially half the risk of LMD compared to post-operative SRS and that HSRT can improve risk of RN to less than 10% while improving local control when meeting the appropriate goals for biologically effective dose (BED) and dose-volume constraints. We recommend a 3- or 5-fraction regimen in lieu of SRS delivering 15 Gy or less for large metastases or resection cavities. We provide a table comparing the BED of commonly used SRS and HSRT regimens, and provide an algorithm to help guide the management of these challenging clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Gutschenritter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Vyshak A. Venur
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Balamurugan Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore 119074, Singapore;
| | - Anoop P. Patel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (A.P.P.); (R.G.E.)
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, ICON Cancer Care, Brisbane 4072, Australia;
| | - Kristin J. Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21093, USA;
| | - Tony J. C. Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| | - Samuel T. Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; (S.T.C.); (J.H.S.)
| | - John H. Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; (S.T.C.); (J.H.S.)
| | - Eric L. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;
| | - Richard G. Ellenbogen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (A.P.P.); (R.G.E.)
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-206-598-4100
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Serizawa T, Higuchi Y, Yamamoto M, Matsunaga S, Nagano O, Sato Y, Aoyagi K, Yomo S, Koiso T, Hasegawa T, Nakazaki K, Moriki A, Kondoh T, Nagatomo Y, Okamoto H, Kohda Y, Kawai H, Shidoh S, Shibazaki T, Onoue S, Kenai H, Inoue A, Mori H. Comparison of treatment results between 3- and 2-stage Gamma Knife radiosurgery for large brain metastases: a retrospective multi-institutional study. J Neurosurg 2019; 131:227-237. [PMID: 30192195 DOI: 10.3171/2018.4.jns172596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In order to obtain better local tumor control for large (i.e., > 3 cm in diameter or > 10 cm3 in volume) brain metastases (BMs), 3-stage and 2-stage Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) procedures, rather than a palliative dose of stereotactic radiosurgery, have been proposed. Here, authors conducted a retrospective multi-institutional study to compare treatment results between 3-stage and 2-stage GKS for large BMs. METHODS This retrospective multi-institutional study involved 335 patients from 19 Gamma Knife facilities in Japan. Major inclusion criteria were 1) newly diagnosed BMs, 2) largest tumor volume of 10.0-33.5 cm3, 3) cumulative intracranial tumor volume ≤ 50 cm3, 4) no leptomeningeal dissemination, 5) no more than 10 tumors, and 6) Karnofsky Performance Status 70% or better. Prescription doses were restricted to between 9.0 and 11.0 Gy in 3-stage GKS and between 11.8 and 14.2 Gy in 2-stage GKS. The total treatment interval had to be within 6 weeks, with at least 12 days between procedures. There were 114 cases in the 3-stage group and 221 in the 2-stage group. Because of the disproportion in patient numbers and the pre-GKS clinical factors between these two GKS groups, a case-matched study was performed using the propensity score matching method. Ultimately, 212 patients (106 from each group) were selected for the case-matched study. Overall survival, tumor progression, neurological death, and radiation-related adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS In the case-matched cohort, post-GKS median survival time tended to be longer in the 3-stage group (15.9 months) than in the 2-stage group (11.7 months), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.65). The cumulative incidences of tumor progression (21.6% vs 16.7% at 1 year, p = 0.31), neurological death (5.1% vs 6.0% at 1 year, p = 0.58), or serious radiation-related adverse events (3.0% vs 4.0% at 1 year, p = 0.49) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective multi-institutional study showed no differences between 3-stage and 2-stage GKS in terms of overall survival, tumor progression, neurological death, and radiation-related adverse events. Both 3-stage and 2-stage GKS performed according to the aforementioned protocols are good treatment options in selected patients with large BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Serizawa
- 1Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, Tokyo
| | | | | | - Shigeo Matsunaga
- 4Stereotactic Radiotherapy Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama
| | - Osamu Nagano
- 5Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Ichihara
| | - Yasunori Sato
- 6Global Clinical Research, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba
| | - Kyoko Aoyagi
- 5Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Ichihara
| | - Shoji Yomo
- 7Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto
| | - Takao Koiso
- 3Katsuta Hospital Mito GammaHouse, Hitachi-naka
| | | | - Kiyoshi Nakazaki
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Attack Center, Ota Memorial Hospital, Fukuyama
| | | | - Takeshi Kondoh
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Shinsuma General Hospital, Kobe
| | | | - Hisayo Okamoto
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Takashima Hospital, Yonago
| | - Yukihiko Kohda
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, Asanogawa General Hospital, Kanazawa
| | - Hideya Kawai
- 15Department of Surgical Neurology, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels, Akita
| | - Satoka Shidoh
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Brain and Blood Vessels, Mihara Memorial Hospital, Isesaki
| | | | - Shinji Onoue
- 18Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama
| | - Hiroyuki Kenai
- 19Department of Neurosurgery, Nagatomi Neurosurgical Hospital, Oita
| | - Akira Inoue
- 20Department of Neurosurgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata; and
| | - Hisae Mori
- 21Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Inoue HK, Sato H, Seto KI, Torikai K, Suzuki Y, Saitoh JI, Noda SE, Nakano T. Five-fraction CyberKnife radiotherapy for large brain metastases in critical areas: impact on the surrounding brain volumes circumscribed with a single dose equivalent of 14 Gy (V14) to avoid radiation necrosis. J Radiat Res 2014; 55:334-42. [PMID: 24187332 PMCID: PMC3951086 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2013] [Revised: 08/23/2013] [Accepted: 09/18/2013] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
The efficacy and toxicity of five-fraction CyberKnife radiotherapy were evaluated in patients with large brain metastases in critical areas. A total of 85 metastases in 78 patients, including tumors >30 cm(3) (4 cm in diameter) were treated with five-fraction CyberKnife radiotherapy with a median marginal dose of 31 Gy at a median prescribed isodose of 58%. Changes in the neurological manifestations, local tumor control, and adverse effects were investigated after treatment. The surrounding brain volumes circumscribed with 28.8 Gy (single dose equivalent to 14 Gy: V14) were measured to evaluate the risk of radiation necrosis. Neurological manifestations, such as motor weakness, visual disturbances and aphasia improved in 28 of 55 patients (50.9%). Local tumor control was obtained in 79 of 85 metastases (92.9%) during a median follow-up of eight months. Symptomatic edema occurred in 10 patients, and two of them (2.6%) required surgical resection because of radiation necrosis. The V14 of these patients was 3.0-19.7 cm(3). There were 16 lesions with a V14 of ≥7.0 cm(3), and two of these lesions developed extensive brain edema due to radiation necrosis. None of the patients with a V14 of <7.0 cm(3) exhibited edema requiring surgical intervention. We therefore conclude that a high rate of local tumor control and low rates of complications can be obtained after five-fraction CyberKnife radiotherapy for large metastases in critical areas. The V14 of the surrounding brain is therefore a useful indicator for the risk of radiation necrosis in patients with large metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi K. Inoue
- Cyber Center, Kanto Neurosurgical Hospital, 1120 Dai, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0804, Japan
| | - Hiro Sato
- Cyber Center, Kanto Neurosurgical Hospital, 1120 Dai, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0804, Japan
| | - Ken-ichi Seto
- Cyber Center, Kanto Neurosurgical Hospital, 1120 Dai, Kumagaya, Saitama, 360-0804, Japan
| | - Kota Torikai
- Gunma University Heavy-ion Medical Research Center, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Jun-ichi Saitoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Shin-ei Noda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Takashi Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Murai T, Ogino H, Manabe Y, Iwabuchi M, Okumura T, Matsushita Y, Tsuji Y, Suzuki H, Shibamoto Y. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using CyberKnife for the treatment of large brain metastases: a dose escalation study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013; 26:151-8. [PMID: 24332223 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2013] [Revised: 10/24/2013] [Accepted: 10/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) with doses of 18-30 Gy in three fractions and 21-35 Gy in five fractions against large brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2005 and 2012, 61 large brain metastases (≥ 2.5 cm in maximum diameter) of a total of 102 in 54 patients were treated with FSRT as a first-line therapy. Neurological symptoms were observed in 47 of the 54 patients before FSRT. Three fractions were applied to tumours with a maximum diameter ≥ 2.5 cm and <4 cm, and five fractions were used for brain metastases ≥ 4 cm. After ensuring that the toxicities were acceptable (≤ grade 2), doses were escalated in steps. Doses to the large brain metastases were as follows: level I, 18-22 Gy/three fractions or 21-25 Gy/five fractions; level II, 22-27 Gy/three fractions or 25-31 Gy/five fractions; level III, 27-30 Gy/three fractions or 31-35 Gy/five fractions. Level III was the target dose level. RESULTS Overall survival rates were 52 and 31% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Local tumour control rates of the 102 total brain metastases were 84 and 78% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Local tumour control rates of the 61 large brain metastases were 77 and 69% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were not observed. CONCLUSIONS The highest dose levels of 27-30 Gy/three fractions and 31-35 Gy/five fractions seemed to be tolerable and effective in controlling large brain metastases. These doses can be used in future studies on FSRT for large brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Murai
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama Cyberknife Center, Yokohama, Japan.
| | - H Ogino
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Y Manabe
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - M Iwabuchi
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - T Okumura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsushima City Hospital, Tsushima, Japan
| | - Y Matsushita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsushima City Hospital, Tsushima, Japan
| | - Y Tsuji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsushima City Hospital, Tsushima, Japan
| | - H Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Tsushima City Hospital, Tsushima, Japan
| | - Y Shibamoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|