Rhabdomyolysis after spinal fusion surgery: management schema and prevention of a catastrophic complication

PURPOSE

Rhabdomyolysis is a clinical syndrome with the potential to cause cardiac arrhythmias, renal failure, and even death. Currently, there are no studies regarding risk factors for developing post-operative rhabdomyolysis (POR) after spinal fusion surgeries. Our objective was to study risk factors associated with, and to develop a decision-making framework for post-operative rhabdomyolysis after spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all spinal fusions of three or more levels over 2.25 years by a single surgeon at two centers. POR was defined as a creatine phosphokinase (CPK) greater than 2000 IU/L.

RESULTS

76 surgical procedures on 72 patients were identified. Rate of POR in our cohort was 22% (17/76). Male sex was associated with POR (p < 0.05). Previously validated risk factors: younger age, lower ASA score, elevated BMI, higher pre-operative creatinine, increased intraoperative blood loss, specific surgical positions, and length of surgery, were not associated with POR. In a logistic regression model, male gender increases the odds of POR in all patients 5.82-fold (p = 0.047). In patients without a second surgery within seven days, a logistic regression model suggests each additional level fused via transpsoas approach, and male gender, increases the risk of POR 1.81-times (p = 0.015), and 6.26-times (p = 0.047), respectively. In patients with posterior fusions, a logistic regression model suggests increasing the number of lateral levels fused via transpsoas approach in the same surgery, and male gender, increases the risk of POR 1.68-times and 6.34-times, respectively. In these same subgroups, increased thickness of the psoas major in lateral transpsoas fusions increased risk of POR (p = 0.023, p = 0.046, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In spinal fusions, increasing the number of lateral levels fused via transpsoas approach, and male gender, predispose patients to increased risk of POR in those without a second surgery within seven days, and in those with a simultaneous posterior fusion.

Single Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation Utilizing Computer Navigation and Robotic Assistance: Retrospective case review and surgical technique considerations

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine safety and short-term outcomes of single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with bilateral posterior instrumentation and robotic assistance. The article also describes surgical technique considerations for the procedure.

METHODS

20 patients underwent single-position LLIF with posterior instrumentation and robotic assistance. The patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Average operative time was 211 ± 34 minutes, average blood loss was 51.25 ± 17 cc's, and average length of stay was 1.4 ± .75 days. There were no intraoperative complications, readmissions, revision surgeries, and no incidence of hardware malposition. Significant improvement in pain and ODI scores was noted at 3 month follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated safety and short-term clinical efficacy of minimally invasive single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral posterior instrumentation utilizing robotic assistance and navigation. There are certain surgical technique considerations that must be followed to ensure optimal surgical workflow and predictable outcomes.

Role of Lateral Fusion in Deformity Surgery

Various techniques exist to surgically treat adult spinal deformity. Traditionally, anterior-based or posterior-based procedures with or without the addition of osteotomies were utilized. More recently, lateral-based approaches to correcting deformity have become more established and widely utilized. This may include the use of large footprint interbody devices with varying degrees of lordosis. Additionally, more powerful corrective techniques via lateral approach include anterior column release of the anterior longitudinal ligament and corpectomy. These present with unique risks that are typically related to the lateral approach, however, have been shown to reduce blood loss, decrease neurologic risk, and morbidity as they can be done through a less invasive approach. This review presents the variable deformity correction techniques that are available to the spinal surgeon, as well as the evidence and evolution of lateral-based techniques.

Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5

OBJECTIVE Recently, authors have called into question the utility and complication index of the lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure at the L4-5 level. Furthermore, the need for direct decompression has also been debated. Here, the authors report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion, relying only on indirect decompression to treat patients with neurogenic claudication secondary to Grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis at the L4-5 level. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective evaluation of 18 consecutive patients with Grade 1 or 2 spondylolisthesis from a prospectively maintained database. All patients underwent a transpsoas approach, followed by posterior percutaneous instrumentation without decompression. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-12 were administered during the clinical evaluations. Radiographic evaluation was also performed. The mean follow-up was 6.2 months. RESULTS Fifteen patients with Grade 1 and 3 patients with Grade 2 spondylolisthesis were identified and underwent fusion at a total of 20 levels. The mean operative time was 165 minutes for the combined anterior and posterior phases of the operation. The estimated blood loss was 113 ml. The most common cage width in the anteroposterior dimension was 22 mm (78%). Anterior thigh dysesthesia was identified on detailed sensory evaluation in 6 of 18 patients (33%); all patients experienced resolution within 6 months postoperatively. No patient had lasting sensory loss or motor deficit. The average ODI score improved 26 points by the 6-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up, the SF-12 mean Physical and Mental Component Summary scores improved by 11.9% and 9.6%, respectively. No patient required additional decompression postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This study offers clinical results to establish lateral lumbar interbody fusion as an effective technique for the treatment of Grade 1 or 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. The use of this surgical approach provides a minimally invasive solution that offers excellent arthrodesis rates as well as favorable clinical and radiological outcomes, with low rates of postoperative complications. However, adhering to the techniques of transpsoas lateral surgery, such as minimal table break, an initial look-and-see approach to the psoas, clear identification of the plexus, minimal cranial caudal expansion of the retractor, mobilization of any traversing sensory nerves, and total psoas dilation times less than 20 minutes, ensures the lowest possible complication profile for both visceral and neural injuries even in the narrow safe zones when accessing the L4-5 disc space in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.