Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain: Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

BACKGROUND

Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain.

METHODS

The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.

Ultrasound-guided interventions during pregnancy for lumbosacral pain unresponsive to conservative treatment: A retrospective review

PURPOSE

Current conventional therapeutic strategies for lumbosacral pain during pregnancy are usually inadequate and data regarding interventional analgesic procedures feasible in pregnant women is scarce. We decided to retrospectively review our experience of ultrasound-guided pain management procedures in pregnant women with lumbosacral pain unresponsive to conservative treatment.

METHODS

Twenty women in the second trimester of pregnancy with lumbosacral pain developed during pregnancy unresponsive to conservative treatments who underwent the following ultrasound-guided pain interventions were included: sacroiliac joint, caudal epidural, interlaminar epidural, and trigger point injections. All patients were followed up until early postnatal period using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.

RESULTS

All but one patient achieved satisfactory pain control throughout the pregnancy with a single injection. Significant declines in ODI and VAS scores was attained within the first 2 weeks and first week of intervention, respectively, which was maintained thereafter until early postnatal period.

CONCLUSIONS

Injections used for effective interventional pain management in nonpregnant populations seem to represent an effective and safe method also for pregnant women when performed under ultrasound guidance, with rapid onset and enduring duration of action until the time of delivery.

Evaluating the discordant relationship between Tarlov cysts and symptoms of pudendal neuralgia

BACKGROUND

Pudendal neuralgia is a painful neuropathic condition involving the pudendal nerve dermatome. Tarlov cysts have been reported in the literature as another potential cause of chronic lumbosacral and pelvic pain. Notably, they are often located in the distribution of the pudendal nerve origin at the S2, S3, and S4 sacral nerve roots and it has been postulated that they may cause similar symptoms to pudendal neuralgia. Literature has been inconsistent on the clinical relevance of the cysts and if they are responsible for symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of S2-S4 Tarlov cysts at the pudendal nerve origin (S2-S4 sacral nerve roots) in patients specifically diagnosed with pudendal neuralgia, and establish association of patient symptoms with location of Tarlov cyst.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed on 242 patients with pudendal neuralgia referred for pelvic magnetic resonance imaging from January 2010 to November 2012. Dedicated magnetic resonance imaging review evaluated for presence, level, site, and size of Tarlov cysts. Among those with demonstrable cysts, subsequent imaging data were collected and correlated with the patients' clinical site of symptoms. Statistical analysis was performed using χ², Pearson χ², and Fisher exact tests to assess significance.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (16.1%) patients demonstrated at least 1 sacral Tarlov cyst; and of the 38 patients with complete pain records, 31 (81.6%) had a mismatch in findings. A total of 50 Tarlov cysts were identified in the entire patient cohort. The majority of the Tarlov cysts were found at the S2-S3 level (32/50; 64%). Seventeen patients (44.7%) revealed unilateral discordant findings: unilateral symptoms on the opposite side as the Tarlov cyst. In addition, 14 (36.8%) patients were detected with bilateral discordant findings: 11 (28.9%) had bilateral symptoms with a unilateral Tarlov cyst, and 3 (7.9%) had unilateral symptoms with bilateral cysts. Concordant findings were only demonstrated in 7 patients (18.4%). No significant association was found between cyst size and pain laterality (P = .161), cyst volume and pain location (P = .546), or cyst size and unilateral vs bilateral pain (P = .997).

CONCLUSION

The increased prevalence of Tarlov cysts is likely not the etiology of pudendal neuralgia, yet both could be due to similar pathogenesis from part of a focal or generalized condition.

Prolonged lumbosacral pain as the initial presentation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in an adult: A case report

RATIONALE

The differential diagnosis of conditions manifesting as bone and joint pain is complex. Although many individuals with acute leukemia experience bone pain, lumbosacral pain as an early feature of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is rare.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Here we report a case of an adult who presented with a 7-month history of persistent lumbosacral pain which had become more severe during the previous month.

DIAGNOSES

Prior to referral, his full blood count revealed no abnormalities, and a computerized tomography scan revealed mild bone hyperplasia of his lumbar vertebrae, with disc herniations of L3-S1. His blood biochemistry and urinary test results had been normal. After referral to our clinic, tests of the morphology, immunology, cytogenetics, and molecular biology of his bone marrow led to a diagnosis of MLL-AF4 fusion positive B-cell ALL.

INTERVENTIONS

Prior to his referral, he had been treated with painkillers by local doctors. The painkillers initially provided pain relief, but their effect wore off over time. After diagnosis, he was started on an adult ALL chemotherapy protocol.

OUTCOMES

His symptoms resolved within a week of starting chemotherapy. At his most recent assessment, 10 months after diagnosis, he was on maintenance chemotherapy and in remission.

LESSONS

This case illustrates that prolonged lumbosacral pain may be a symptom of a life-threatening condition, rather than only attributable to chronic inflammation or disk herniations. Therefore, clinicians need to pay attention to subtle differences in the clinical presentation of patients with lumbosacral pain.