Placental, maternal, fetal, and technical origins of false-positive cell-free DNA screening results

The introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing has resulted in substantial reductions to previously accepted false-positive rates of prenatal screening. Despite this, the possibility of false-positive results remains a challenging consideration in clinical practice, particularly considering the increasing uptake of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing, and the subsequent increased proportion of high-risk results attributable to various biological events besides fetal aneuploidy. Confined placental mosaicism, whereby chromosome anomalies exclusively affect the placenta, is perhaps the most widely accepted cause of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. There remains, however, a substantial degree of ambiguity in the literature pertaining to the clinical ramifications of confined placental mosaicism and its potential association with placental insufficiency, and consequentially adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction. Other causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing include vanishing twin syndrome, in which the cell-free DNA from a demised aneuploidy-affected twin triggers a high-risk result, technical failures, and maternal origins of abnormal cell-free DNA such as uterine fibroids or unrecognized mosaicisms. Most concerningly, maternal malignancies are also a documented cause of false-positive screening results. In this review, we compile what is currently known about the various causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing.

Clinical impacts of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing for rare autosomal trisomy

BACKGROUND

Genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing identifies several rare autosomal trisomies in the general obstetrical population, but its use is questioned by its low positive predictive value. Furthermore, the origin of rare autosomal trisomies and the clinical effect of reporting them has not been sufficiently investigated. In addition, professional societies express their need for data assessing the clinical use of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing for rare autosomal trisomies for years.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the origin of rare autosomal trisomies and the clinical effect of disclosing rare autosomal trisomies in clinical settings.

STUDY DESIGN

Women who received noninvasive prenatal testing between March 2021 and March 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Clinical follow-up and cytogenetic and molecular investigations were performed. Posthoc analysis was performed to investigate the association between placental mosaicism and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 154 rare autosomal trisomies were identified in 89,242 pregnancies (0.17%) through noninvasive prenatal testing. In the 120 cases in which cytogenetic and molecular investigations were carried out, the rare autosomal trisomies were found to originate from true fetal mosaicism (n=5), uniparental disomy (n=5), maternal mosaic trisomy (n=3), maternal malignancy (n=1), and confined placental mosaicism (n=106). Clinical follow-up showed that 40% of all rare autosomal trisomy cases had adverse perinatal outcomes. In women with false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing results originating from confined placental mosaicism, the frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes was 26%. More importantly, the placental mosaicism ratio revealed by noninvasive prenatal testing was significantly higher in women who experienced adverse perinatal outcomes than those who did not (0.688 vs 0.332; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Women with noninvasive prenatal testing results indicative of rare autosomal trisomies are at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, and that risk can be stratified using chromosomes and the mosaicism ratio revealed by noninvasive prenatal testing. Our data are valuable for obstetrical caregivers advising a patient with a noninvasive prenatal testing result indicative of a rare autosomal trisomy and a false-positive diagnosis and for managing risks during pregnancy.