The Use of 0° and 70° Endoscopes in Maxillary Antrostomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Performing an effective maxillary antrostomy is critical to improving chronic maxillary sinusitis symptomatology. Incomplete dissection of the uncinate process and failure to incorporate the natural drainage pathway may lead to recirculation and need for revision surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine if 70° endoscopes provide added value in determining incomplete dissection or residual disease.

METHODS

Prospective study of 35 sinuses from 18 patients undergoing FESS for Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) between 11/1/2020 and 4/30/2021. Two fellowship trained Rhinologists initially performed maxillary antrostomies exclusively using a 0° endoscope, then transitioned to a 70° endoscope. Surgeons completed a survey to assess completion of the antrostomy prior to use of 70° endoscope, sino-nasal anatomy, and difficulty of the operation. Intraoperative photographs before and after using a 70° endoscope were evaluated by a third party. Pre-operative CT scans were used to evaluate the sphenoid keel-caudal septum-nasolacrimal duct (SK-CS-NL) angle.

RESULTS

Of 35 sinuses from 18 patients all 35 sinuses had CRS with 48.5% having nasal polyposis and 42.9% having active infection. There was residual inflammatory tissue in the anterior maxillary sinus, including polypoid tissue and uncinate process prior to using the 70° endoscope in 82.9% of sinuses. The natural drainage pathway was not incorporated into the dissection in 28.6% of sinuses before converting to 70° endoscope. Incomplete dissection with 0° endoscope was not associated with nasal polyposis (P = .086) or uncinate position (0.741). Narrow SK-CS-NL angles were associated with incomplete dissection of the anterior maxillary sinus with 0° endoscope (16.0° ± 3.0° vs 20.6° ± 3.2°; P = .013).

CONCLUSION

Use of 70° endoscope in maxillary antrostomy may be beneficial in identifying and resecting disease within the anterior maxillary sinus that may otherwise be difficult to find using a 0° endoscope. This is especially true in patients with narrow nasolacrimal duct positioning.

Atypical Presentation of Silent Sinus Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction

Silent sinus syndrome (SSS) is a condition characterized by ophthalmologic features, such as spontaneous enophthalmos and hypoglobus with ipsilateral maxillary sinus atelectasis and an otherwise asymptomatic presentation. SSS has been documented secondary to a number of external causes, including trauma or surgery, but has less commonly been described in the setting of a potential mass in the deep masticator space.

Case Presentation

A 56-year-old woman with a history of chronic headaches with normal prior sinonasal imaging presented with increasing right-sided facial pain and headaches that radiated to her occiput, subjective visual changes, sharp ear pain, and long-standing subjective diminished sense of smell. Physical examination was normal, while nasal endoscopy demonstrated lateral bowing of the medial maxillary wall on the right. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a homogenous 2 × 2 × 2.4 cm T1- and T2-weighted, hyperintense mass lesion in the deep masticator space splaying the right medial and lateral pterygoid muscles concerning for a possible lipomatous lesion. Computed tomography revealed an atelectatic and opacified maxillary sinus with inward bowing of the posterior maxillary wall and increased orbital volume on that side. Endoscopic maxillary antrostomy was performed with biopsy of the retromaxillary space lesion and with near immediate resolution of the patient’s symptoms. Histologic examination of the mass demonstrated mature adipose tissue with few aggregates of benign small vessels.

Discussion

This is an unusual presentation of SSS, with an accompanying enlargement of the retromaxillary fat pad. We herein review our clinical experience with SSS and provide a literature review of the presentation, management, and perioperative considerations for SSS.

Extent of maxillary sinus surgery and its effect on instrument access, irrigation penetration, and disease clearance

BACKGROUND

Middle meatal antrostomy (MMA) provides limited access to the anteromedial and inferior aspect of the maxillary sinus (MS) often resulting in residual disease and inflammatory burden. Newer extended procedures, such as mega-antrostomy (Mega-A) and extended modified mega-antrostomy (EMMA), have been developed to address this limitation. This study assesses the effect of varying extent of MS surgery on irrigation penetration and access of instrumentation.

METHODS

The MS of 5 fresh-frozen cadavers were sequentially dissected. Irrigation was evaluated with a squeeze bottle (SB) in different head positions and using different volumes of fluid. Surgical reach and visualization were examined using common sinus instruments and different angled endoscopes. A disease simulation was also performed to check for residual debris after instrumentation and irrigations.

RESULTS

Irrigation penetration improved as antrostomy size increased (p < 0.0001), with a significant difference observed between the extended procedures and MMA. The effect of the volume was significant for SB (p < 0.0001) but head positions appeared irrelevant (p = 0.613). Overall visualization improved for Mega-A and EMMA. A similar trend was seen for the reach of the instruments to all sinus wall subsites. EMMA facilitated the most removal of "sinus disease" in the disease simulation model when compared with both MMA and Mega-A, due to its reach of the anteroinferior aspects of the maxillary sinus.

CONCLUSIONS

High-volume irrigation using SB achieved good sinus penetration, irrespective of head position. Extended MS procedures appear to further increase irrigation penetration as well as surgical access.

A novel route for placing free flap pedicle from a palatal defect

One of the better options available to repair a large palatal defect is by employing a free flap. Almost all the times such free flaps are plumbed to facial vessels. The greatest challenge in such cases is the placement of the pedicle from palatal shelf to recipient vessels because there is no direct route available. As majority of large palatal fistulae are encountered in operated cleft palates there is a possibility of routing the pedicle through a cleft in the maxillary arch or via pyriform aperture. When such a possibility doesn’t exist the pedicle is routed behind the maxillary arch. We describe a novel technique of pedicle placement through a maxillary antrostomy, in this case report, where a large palatal fistula in a 16 year old boy was repaired employing a free radial artery forearm flap. The direct route provided by maxillary antrostomy is considered the most expeditious of all possibilities mentioned above.

What is the Best Route to the Meckel Cave? Anatomical Comparison between the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach and a Lateral Approach

Background Traditionally, a pterional approach is utilized to access the Meckel cave. Depending on the tumor location, extradural dissection of the Gasserian ganglion can be performed. An endoscopic endonasal access could potentially avoid a craniotomy in these cases. Methods We performed an endoscopic endonasal approach as well as a lateral approach to the Meckel cave on six anatomic specimens. To access the Meckel cave endoscopically, a complete sphenoethmoidectomy and maxillary antrostomy followed by a transpterygoid approach was performed. For lateral access, a pterional craniotomy with extradural dissection was performed. Results The endoscopic endonasal approach allowed adequate access to the Gasserian ganglion. All the relevant anatomy was identified without difficulty. Both approaches allowed for a similar exposure, but the endonasal approach avoided brain retraction and improved anteromedial exposure of the Gasserian ganglion. The lateral approach provided improved access posterolaterally and to the superior portion. Conclusion The endoscopic endonasal approach to the Meckel cave is anatomically feasible. The morbidity associated with brain retraction from the open approaches can be avoided. Further understanding of the endoscopic anatomy within this region can facilitate continued advancement in endoscopic endonasal surgery and improvement in the safety and efficacy of these procedures.