A Woman With HNF1A-Associated Monogenic Diabetes Treated Successfully With Repaglinide Monotherapy

Background/Objective

Monogenic diabetes is a rare type of diabetes that is commonly misdiagnosed as type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, which adversely impacts patient care. Such cases are particularly challenging given the heterogeneity in presentation and overlap with other types of diabetes. As the sole use of meglitinides, especially repaglinide, to treat HNF1A-associated monogenic diabetes has been rarely reported in a few other observational studies, we describe a patient who was treated successfully with repaglinide.

Case Report

A 38-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes mellitus, congenital deafness, chronic kidney disease, and retinopathy presented with difficulty controlling her blood glucose levels. Although initially treated with insulin, she had periods of noncompliance with insulin without experiencing diabetic ketoacidosis. Although on insulin therapy, she experienced multiple episodes of hypoglycemia. The laboratory tests showed a hemoglobin A1c level of 10.8%, c-peptide level of 2.7 ng/mL (1.1-4.4 ng/mL), glucose level of 192 mg/dL, creatinine level of 1.23 ng/dL, and severely increased microalbumin-to-creatinine ratio of 638 mg/g (normal range, 0-29 mg/g). Pancreatic autoantibodies were negative. Genetic testing revealed a diagnosis of HNF1A-associated monogenic diabetes (c. 1340C>T (p.P447L)). She was ultimately treated with repaglinide after trials of sulfonylureas and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors led to frequent hypoglycemia and a significant increase in the hemoglobin A1c level, respectively.

Discussion

This case highlights the importance of correctly diagnosing monogenic diabetes and reports the successful use of repaglinide to treat HNF1A-associated monogenic diabetes.

Conclusion

Patients with HNF1A-associated monogenic diabetes who do not achieve euglycemia with sulfonylureas and insulin may be successfully treated with repaglinide monotherapy.

Characterization of binding by repaglinide and nateglinide with glycated human serum albumin using high-performance affinity microcolumns

High-performance affinity microcolumns were used to characterize binding by the anti-diabetic drugs repaglinide and nateglinide with normal and glycated forms of human serum albumin. The microcolumns contained only nmol amounts of protein and provided a detailed analysis of these drug interactions with good precision and in a matter of minutes per experiment. The overall binding by repaglinide to normal and glycated albumin fits a model with two types of binding sites: a set of one or two moderate-to-high affinity regions and a larger set of weaker regions with association equilibrium constants of ∼10⁵ and 10³  M^-1 , respectively, at pH 7.4 and 37°C. Competition studies gave site-specific association constants for repaglinide and nateglinide at Sudlow site I of 4.2 × 10⁴ and 5.0 × 10⁴  M^-1 for normal albumin, with a decrease of 26%-30% being seen for nateglinide with glycated albumin and no significant change being noted for repaglinide. At Sudlow site II, repaglinide and nateglinide had association constants for normal albumin of 6.1 × 10⁴ and 7.1 × 10⁵  M^-1 , with glycated albumin giving an increase in the association constant at this site for repaglinide of 1.6- to 1.8-fold and a decrease for nateglinide of 51%-58%.

Comparative risk of serious hypoglycemia with oral antidiabetic monotherapy: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To examine and compare risks of serious hypoglycemia among antidiabetic monotherapy-treated adults receiving metformin, a sulfonylurea, a meglitinide, or a thiazolidinedione.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of apparently new users of monotherapy with metformin, glimepiride, glipizide, glyburide, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, nateglinide, or repaglinide within a dataset of Medicaid beneficiaries from California, Florida, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. We did not include users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, or sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. We identified serious hypoglycemia outcomes within 180 days following new use using a validated, diagnosis-based algorithm. We calculated age- and sex-standardized outcome occurrence rates for each drug and generated propensity score-adjusted hazard ratios vs metformin using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

The ranking of standardized occurrence rates of serious hypoglycemia was glyburide > glimepiride > glipizide > repaglinide > nateglinide > rosiglitazone > pioglitazone > metformin. Rates were increased for all study drugs at higher average daily doses. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) vs metformin were 3.95 (3.66-4.26) for glyburide, 3.28 (2.98-3.62) for glimepiride, 2.57 (2.38-2.78) for glipizide, 2.03 (1.64-2.52) for repaglinide, 1.21 (0.89-1.66) for nateglinide, 0.90 (0.75-1.07) for rosiglitazone, and 0.80 (0.68-0.93) for pioglitazone.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulfonylureas were associated with the highest rates of serious hypoglycemia. Among all study drugs, the highest rate was seen with glyburide. Pioglitazone was associated with a lower adjusted hazard for serious hypoglycemia vs metformin, while rosiglitazone and nateglinide had hazards similar to that of metformin.

Meglitinides increase the risk of hypoglycemia in diabetic patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a nationwide, population-based study

The safety of short-acting meglitinides in diabetic patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been widely reported. Diabetic patients with advanced CKD who had a serum creatinine level of > 6 mg/dL a hematocrit level of ≦ 28% and received erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment between 2000 and 2010, were included in this nationwide study in Taiwan. The outcomes of interest were defined as hypoglycemia and long-term mortality. The risks of hypoglycemia and death were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, with end-stage renal disease and anti-diabetic drugs as time-dependent variables. Fresh users and matched non-users of meglitinides (both n = 2,793) were analyzed. The use of meglitinides increased the risk of hypoglycemia (HR, 1.94, p<0.001), as did other anti-diabetic agents. Concomitant use of meglitinide and insuilin will incresase the hypoglycemic risk. (HR, 1.69, p=0.018) Moreover, it was not the use of meglitinides, but the presence of hypoglycemia that predicted mortality. The function curve showed an insignificant trend towards increased hypoglycemic risk in patients aged > 62 and ≤ 33 years from the generalized additive model. This study suggests that the use of short-acting meglitinides could be associated with increased risk of hypoglycemia in diabetic patients with advanced CKD, especially in patients aged > 62 and ≤ 33 years. Meglitinide combined with insulin will increase hypoglycemia in patients with advanced CKD.

Pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes: oral medications

OBJECTIVE

To review the oral and injectable pharmacologic treatment options for type 2 diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using PubMed electronic database for studies published in English between 1993 and September 2014. Search terms included diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes, and the individual name for each antidiabetic medication reviewed. In addition, manual searches were performed for cross-references from publications. Package inserts, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site, Institute for Safe Medication Practices Web site, American Diabetes Association Web site and scientific session poster presentations, and individual drug company Web pages were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

This review focused on information elucidated over the past 10 years to assist prescribers in choosing optimal therapy based on individual patient characteristics. Studies leading to the approval of or raising safety concerns for the antidiabetic medications reviewed in this article were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In the past 10 years, there have been 4 novel oral antidiabetic medication classes and 9 new injectable agents and insulin products approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes as well as new information regarding the safety and use of several older antidiabetic medication classes. The distinctions were reviewed for each individual agent, and a comparison was completed if there was more than one agent in a particular therapeutic class. Using current information available, select investigational agents in phase III trials or those with a pending new drug application were highlighted.

CONCLUSION

There are now 9 distinct oral pharmacologic classes and a variety of insulin and noninsulin injectable medications available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Metformin remains the first-line treatment option for most patients. When considering options for alternative or additional treatment, prescribers must weigh the benefits and risks using individual patient characteristics.

Gender-specific effects of oral hypoglycaemic agents on cancer risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To analyse the association between cancer incidence and oral diabetes therapy (biguanide, sulphonylurea, thiazolidinedione and meglitinide) in men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the electronic health record-based Cleveland Clinic Diabetes Registry (25 613 patients) was cross-indexed with the histology-based tumour registry (48 051 cancer occurrences) over an 8-year period (1998-2006). Multiple imputations were used to account for missing data. Cox regression with propensity scores was used to model time for the development of incident cancer in each of the imputed datasets and the results were pooled.

RESULTS

During 51 994 person follow-up years, 892 incident cancer cases were identified; prostate (14.5%) and breast (11.7%) malignancies were most frequent. In women, thiazolidinedione use was associated with a 32% decreased cancer risk compared with sulphonylurea use [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.97, in the adjusted analysis]. Comparison of insulin secretagogues (sulphonylurea and meglitinide) versus insulin sensitizers (biguanide and thiazolidinedione) demonstrated a 21% decreased cancer risk in insulin sensitizers [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.64-0.98) in the adjusted analysis]. Oral diabetes therapy showed no significant difference in men. Adjustments were made for age, body mass index (BMI), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, coronary heart disease (CHD), diabetes oral monotherapy, race, gender, haemoglobin A1c, statin use, income, insulin use, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), new diabetes status, prior cancer, prior cerebrovascular accident (stroke or transient ischaemic event), systolic/diastolic blood pressure, tobacco use (ever/never) and the propensity score for receiving a biguanide.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral insulin sensitizers, particularly thiazolidinedione, are associated with decreased malignancy risk in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The role of nateglinide and repaglinide, derivatives of meglitinide, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide, presenting a great challenge to the public health systems due to high morbidity and mortality, because of frequent micro-/macro-vascular complications. Many treatment options are now available, with different efficacy as well as mechanisms of action to improve deranged glucose metabolism. We review some of the available data on derivatives of meglitinide, namely nateglinide and repaglinide. These two compounds increase insulin secretion by a mechanism similar to the one of sulfonylureas, but with a shorter half-life. Nateglinide and repaglinide, derivatives of meglitinides, have characteristic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties that, together with their proposed mechanism of action, make them useful for type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially when used in combination therapy.

Combination therapy for patients with Type 2 diabetes: repaglinide in combination with metformin

In patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), adequate glycemic control is a critical factor in reducing long-term micro- and macro-vascular complications. Traditionally, the approach is to initiate monotherapy first, followed by combination therapy that targets two main defects in T2DM. Repaglinide, a rapidly acting insulin secretagog, stimulates insulin secretion via closure of ATP-dependent potassium channels on the cell membrane of β-cells. Repaglinide is ideally used at mealtime to reduce postprandial glucose levels, thus lowering the 24-h blood glucose profile and improving HbA1c levels. Metformin is an insulin sensitizer that effectively acts against insulin resistance, one of the predominant metabolic defects in T2DM. A combination of repaglinide and metformin is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with T2DM. When monotherapy with oral antidiabetic agents fails, combination therapy with repaglinide plus metformin has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the treatment of T2DM.

Relationships between the Na(+)/K(+) pump and ATP and ADP content in mouse pancreatic islets: effects of meglitinide and glibenclamide

We have previously demonstrated that both D-glucose and glibenclamide stimulate the Na(+)/K(+) pump and suggested that this may be part of the membrane repolarization process, following the primary depolarization by these agents. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the non-sulphonylurea meglitinide (HB 699) exerts similar effects as glibenclamide or glucose on the islet Na(+)/K(+) pump and if effects of meglitinide or glibenclamide on this pump activity is paralleled by changes in islet ATP content and/or ATP/ADP ratio. The acyl-amino-alkyl benzoic acid derivative, meglitinide, stimulated the islet ouabain-sensitive portion of (86)Rb(+) influx (Na(+)/K(+) pump) by 53%, while the ouabain-resistant portion was inhibited by 70%. The stimulatory effect was not additive to that caused by D-glucose, suggesting that both agents may activate the Na(+)/K(+) pump via the same mechanism. Glibenclamide (10 microM) decreased the islet ATP and ADP content as well as the ATP/ADP ratio at 0 mM glucose. These effects were no longer observed at 10 mM glucose. Meglitinide (10 or 50 microM) lowered the islet ATP and ADP content at 0 mM glucose without affecting the ATP/ADP ratio. At 10 mM glucose, however, 10 microM of the drug reduced the islet ATP content but not the ATP/ADP ratio, while 50 microM of the drug, besides lowering the ATP content, also reduced the ATP/ADP ratio. Diazoxide (0.5 mM) increased the islet ATP content in the absence of glucose, an effect not seen in the presence of 10 mM glucose. The rate of glucose oxidation at 1, 10 or 20 mM of the sugar was not affected by glibenclamide (0.1 - 10 microM) and at 10 or 20 mM of the sugar not affected by meglitinide (1 - 100 microM). These results suggest that glibenclamide and meglitinide lower the islet ATP level by indirectly activating the beta-cell Na(+)/K(+) pump, which is a major consumer of ATP in the islets, while diazoxide increases the ATP level due to inhibition of the pump.

Inhibition of heterologously expressed cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator Cl- channels by non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents

1. Hypoglycaemia-inducing sulphonylureas, such as glibenclamide, inhibit cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) Cl- channels. In search of modulators of CFTR, we investigated the effects of the non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents meglitinide, repaglinide, and mitiglinide (KAD-1229) on CFTR Cl- channels in excised inside-out membrane patches from C127 cells expressing wild-type human CFTR. 2. When added to the intracellular solution, meglitinide and mitiglinide inhibited CFTR Cl- currents with half-maximal concentrations of 164+/-19 microM and 148+/-36 microM, respectively. However, repaglinide only weakly inhibited CFTR Cl- currents. 3. To understand better how non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents inhibit CFTR, we studied single channels. Channel blockade by both meglitinide and mitiglinide was characterized by flickery closures and a significant decrease in open probability (Po). In contrast, repaglinide was without effect on either channel gating or Po, but caused a small decrease in single-channel current amplitude. 4. Analysis of the dwell time distributions of single channels indicated that both meglitinide and mitiglinide greatly decreased the open time of CFTR. Mitiglinide-induced channel closures were about 3-fold longer than those of meglitinide. 5. Inhibition of CFTR by meglitinide and mitiglinide was voltage-dependent: at positive voltages channel blockade was relieved. 6. The data demonstrate that non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents inhibit CFTR. This indicates that these agents have a wider specificity of action than previously recognized. Like glibenclamide, non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents may inhibit CFTR by occluding the channel pore and preventing Cl- permeation.

Structural requirements of sulphonylureas and analogues for interaction with sulphonylurea receptor subtypes

1. The structure-activity relationship for hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas and analogues was examined. Binding affinities were compared using membranes from HIT-T15 cells (beta-cell line) and from COS-7 cells transiently expressing sulphonylurea receptor subtypes (SUR1, SUR2A and SUR2B). Inhibition of adenosine-triphosphate-sensitive K+ channels (KATP-channels) was measured in mouse pancreatic beta-cells. 2. The tested compounds displayed similar binding affinities for SUR2A and SUR2B. 3. Meglitinide (benzoic acid derivative) bound to SUR1 and the SUR2 isoforms with similar affinities. Replacement of the carboxyl group of meglitinide by a methyl group significantly decreased the binding affinities for SUR1 and the SUR2 isoforms (>4 fold) and the potency to inhibit KATP-channel activity of beta-cells (24 fold). Replacement of the carboxyl group of meglitinide by a sulphonylurea group significantly increased the affinities for SUR1 (5 fold) and the SUR2 isoforms (13 - 16 fold). 4. Glibenclamide bound to the SUR2 isoforms with 300 - 500 fold lower affinity than to SUR1. Exchanging the cyclohexyl ring of glibenclamide by a methyl group or removal of the lipophilic side chain of glibenclamide (5-chloro-2-methoxy-benzamidoethyl chain) markedly reduced but did not abolish the selectivity for SUR1. 5. In conclusion, interaction of sulphonylureas and acidic analogues with SUR1, SUR2A and SUR2B is favoured by the anionic group of these drugs. Hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas (e.g. glibenclamide) owe selectivity for SUR1 to lipophilic substitution on their urea group. Sulphonylureas without lipophilic substitution on the urea group could represent lead compounds for the development of SUR2-selective drugs.