Metal Marking Behavior and Testing of Porcelain Tableware

The term “metal marking” is widely used to define the common phenomenon of tableware glazes being damaged by metallic cutlery. Appearing as unaesthetic gray marks and scratches resulting from normal conditions of use, these defects deeply affect the performance of ceramic products, especially in intensive environments, such as in the hospitality industry. The scope of this article is to establish a comprehensive review of the phenomenon, focusing on the physical and chemical mechanisms involved in the process, and their interactions and consequences. It also intends to list the different methods normally followed to avoid or at least reduce this defect, in order to enhance the durability of porcelain dishware. This manuscript also provides a review of the different testing methods developed and used by the tableware industry and technical centers to quantify the ability of porcelain tableware to produce metal marks. To face the current lack of any international or at least national standard testing procedure that would permit a reliable comparison of products, a new metal marking test developed at the Technological Center for Ceramic and Glass (CTCV) is presented as an alternative to common tests normally based on knives as a marking tool.

Are asymmetric metal markings on the cone surface of ceramic femoral heads an indication of entrapped debris?

BACKGROUND

The probability of in vivo failure of ceramic hip joint implants is very low (0.004-0.05%). In addition to material flaws and overloading, improper handling during implantation can induce fractures of the ceramic ball head in the long term. Identifying the causes of an in vivo fracture contributes to improved understanding and potentially to further reduction of the fracture probability for patients. Asymmetric metal markings on the cone surface of in vivo ball head fractures have been reported. The question, therefore, is whether asymmetric loading is the sole cause or whether additional factors, specifically contamination entrapped in the taper fit, also contribute or are even the main cause.

METHODS

The influence of the asymmetric physiological load configuration on resulting metal markings in the cone surface of an alumina femoral ball head with and without biological contaminants was investigated. Static and cyclic tests on ball heads were carried out in a load configuration of 0° (axisymmetric) and 40° in a physiological environment. The analysis of the metal marking was carried out to gain a better understanding of the processes that contribute to the generation of metal marking. Fractography was carried out to determine the fracture initiation of failed ball heads.

RESULTS

Different types and sizes of residuals entrapped in the conical surface are shown to yield strongly asymmetric metal marking patterns. All heads tested without contaminants exhibited an almost homogenous distribution of residual metal markings around the circumference of the ceramic cone surface at the proximal end of the bore hole. The failure of ball heads that contained entrapped contaminants revealed a common fracture pattern. The site of fracture initiation on two of the failed heads was in the entrance region of the bore hole on the superior half of the head.

CONCLUSION

Asymmetric metal markings observed on the ball heads tested in this investigation are most probably caused by the presence of contaminants entrapped in the taper fit. Homogenous metal mark distributions around the circumference indicate proper assembly of the ball head without entrapped contaminants. It should, however, be noted that different taper designs may possibly result in different marking patterns.