Comparative Evaluation of the Incidence of Dentin Microcracks Following Biomechanical Preparation Using Four Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems: An In Vitro Study

INTRODUCTION

Biomechanical preparation has gotten easier over time with the development of nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments. Despite their benefits, research has shown that these files frequently result in microcracks in the root canal dentin, which can fracture the roots. Such mishaps should be prevented, as they compromise the integrity of the root and reduce the long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at Government Dental College and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India. Eighty permanent mandibular premolar teeth were included. All the roots were inspected for any pre-existing cracks or craze lines under a stereomicroscope. The teeth were decoronated and then divided into four groups (n = 20): Group I: TruNatomy, Group II: Neoendo Flex, Group III: ProTaper Gold, and Group IV: 2Shape. The samples were instrumented according to the group to which they belonged. The roots were then sectioned horizontally at 3 mm and 6 mm from the apex and examined under a stereomicroscope at 40x for the presence of microcracks.

RESULTS

The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26 (released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). A chi-square test was applied, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. The highest incidence of microcracks was associated with ProTaper Gold (65%), followed by Neoendo Flex (45%), TruNatomy (20%), and 2Shape (20%).

CONCLUSION

 All rotary instruments resulted in dentinal damage. ProTaper Gold exhibited the highest frequency of dentin cracks. TruNatomy and 2Shape exhibited satisfactory results with minimal crack formation.

Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Crack After Root Canal Preparation Using TruNatomy, Neoendo Flex, and Neoendo Neohybrid Files: An In Vitro Study

AIM

The objective of the study was to assess and compare the dentinal microcracks produced by TruNatomy, Neoendo Flex, and Neoendo Neohybrid files during root canal preparation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this in vitro investigation, four groups of 25 samples each were assembled from 100 mandibular premolar teeth. Using TruNatomy, Neoendo Flex, and Neoendo Neohybrid files, or leaving the teeth unprepared (control), the teeth underwent root canal preparation. Horizontal sections were taken at different distances from the apex to analyze dentinal cracks. A stereomicroscope was used to assess the existence or lack of cracks, and chi-square tests were performed on the data.

RESULTS

In the control group, there were no cracks. TruNatomy files created fewer cracks compared to Neoendo Flex and Neoendo Neohybrid files.

CONCLUSIONS

This in vitro investigation demonstrates that the root surface might acquire dentinal cracks as a result of nickel-titanium instruments. Compared to Neoendo Flex and Neoendo Neohybrid files, TruNatomy showed a decreased incidence of cracks. However, it is important to note that these conclusions are limited to the scope of this study.