Ultrasound-guided-electromyography in plegic muscle: Usefulness of nerve stimulation

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

In traumatic nerve lesions (TNLs), motor unit potentials (MUPs) may be difficult to detect in early injury. Ultrasound-guided electromyography (US-EMG) can aid in identifying areas of muscle activation, but its sensitivity can be improved. In this study we compare the sensitivity of US-EMG alone with US-EMG after peripheral nerve stimulation (NC-US-EMG) to better identify active muscle regions.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 32 patients with severe TNLs were evaluated with standard EMG (ST-EMG), US-EMG, and NC-US-EMG at baseline (T0), after 2 to 3 months (T1), and after 5 to 6 months (T2).

RESULTS

NC-US-EMG was more sensitive in detecting MUPs compared with US-EMG and ST-EMG at T0 (19 patients vs 14 and 5 patients, respectively). In addition, both US-guided techniques were more sensitive than ST-EMG in detecting MUPs (ST-EMG vs US-EMG: P = .014; ST-EMG vs NC-US-EMG: P = .003). At T1, ST-EMG remained less sensitive NC-US-EMG (P = .019). No significant differences were observed among the three techniques at T2.

DISCUSSION

In the evaluation of severe TNLs, the combination of peripheral nerve stimulation and US increases the sensitivity of EMG for MUP detection at baseline and 2 to 3 months postinjury.

Magnetic Resonance Neurography for Evaluation of Peripheral Nerves

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) continue to present both diagnostic and treatment challenges. While nerve transections are typically a straightforward diagnosis, other types of PNIs, such as chronic or traumatic nerve compression, may be more difficult to evaluate due to their varied presentation and limitations of current diagnostic tools. As a result, diagnosis may be delayed, and these patients may go on to develop progressive symptoms, impeding normal activity. In the past, PNIs were diagnosed by history and clinical examination alone or techniques that raised concerns regarding accuracy, invasiveness, or operator dependency. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) has been increasingly utilized in clinical settings due to its ability to visualize complex nerve structures along their entire pathway and distinguish nerves from surrounding vasculature and tissue in a noninvasive manner. In this review, we discuss the clinical applications of MRN in the diagnosis, as well as pre- and postsurgical assessments of patients with peripheral neuropathies.

Predicting a successful outcome in sacral neuromodulation testing: Are urodynamic parameters prognostic?

AIMS

To assess whether the urodynamic parameters of mean voided volume, peak detrusor overactivity (DO) pressure, bladder compliance, capacity, and volume at first detrusor overactivity during filling cystometry can predict a successful outcome at first stage tined lead placement (FSTLP).

METHODS

Ninty-nine consecutive patients with urodynamically proven idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) refractory to medical treatment and opting for Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS), were assessed pre and post FSTLP. Data from 3-day frequency-volume charts, and patient reported (subjective) outcomes were used to assess success or failure after FSTLP. Success was defined as improvement in symptoms >50%. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to ascertain whether key parameters at filling cystometrogram were predictors for success prior to FSTLP.

RESULTS

Binary logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate any significant relationship between the five parameters at urodynamics and outcome at FSTLP (B < 0.01, P > 0.16) for all parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this prospective analysis on patients with IDO refractive to medical therapy referred for SNS would suggest that aside from proving DO at urodynamics as a pre-requisite for intervention as per NICE and EAU guidelines, no parameter is predictive for a successful outcome at FSTLP.