A Comparison of Mini Open Transverse Incision and Longitudinal Incision for the Release of Moderate and Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common condition seen in daily clinical practice. Multiple minimally invasive techniques have emerged in the last decades for median nerve decompression. However, many research are needed to study the outcome on the patients and their safety profile.

METHODS

We will compare group A that includes patients operated on using the minimally invasive transverse incision (number of patients = n = 221, females 76.7% and males 22.8%) versus group B that includes patients operated on using the longitudinal incision (n = 194, female 70.1% and male 29.9%) in term of clinical satisfaction and safety. The mean age of group A is 58.1±5.1 and that of group B is 58.8±4.8. The male and female distribution in both groups and the mean age were both similar with no statistically significant difference for the age (p = 0.79) or the gender distribution (p = 0.1). Data collected prospectively at regular intervals in time (preoperatively and at one month, three months, and six months post-carpal tunnel release (CTR)) between January 2006 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients' clinical findings, grip strength measurement using a hand dynamometer, and postoperative satisfaction measured using the BCTQ (Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire) scoring system were recorded and analyzed for each technique.

RESULTS

A total of 415 patients were included in our study. All patients included had moderate to severe median nerve compression documented by nerve-conducted studies with positive Tinel's and Phalen's signs. Baseline demographics between group A (CTR through a longitudinal palmar mini-incision) and group B (CTR with a mini-transverse incision at the palmar crease) didn't show a statistically significant difference. Both groups showed improved grip strength and BCTQ scores at the post-operative follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Median nerve decompression using both types of incisions has resulted in the same functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caudal Epidural Neuroplasty in Patients With Lumbar Epidural Fibrosis

Introduction Lumbar and leg pain can be caused by many factors, including scar tissue in the epidural space. Epidural fibrosis may cause chronic radicular low back pain. Adhesions in the epidural space may occur due to surgical or non-surgical reasons. Epidural adhesiolysis, i.e., neuroplasty, eliminates the pain-causing effects of scar tissue by releasing the nerve from the scar tissue or decompressing the nerve. In light of this information, this study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty interventions performed in the algology clinic in patients with lumbar epidural fibrosis who have and have not undergone lumbar surgery. Methods The sample of this retrospective study consisted of 72 patients with chronic radicular low back pain, finding fibrosis in the epidural region on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), filling defect after epidurogram, and caudal epidural neuroplasty. Patients' visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, pregabalin, duloxetine, and opioid doses were evaluated before and one month and six months after having neuroplasty. Results The VAS and ODI scores and pregabalin, duloxetine, and opioid doses decreased significantly in patients who had had caudal epidural neuroplasty at post-procedure endpoints compared to before the procedure (p<0.001). The paired temporal comparisons of the data of the patients who underwent epidural neuroplasty procedures before the procedure, one month after the procedure, and six months after the procedure revealed significant differences in the VAS and ODI scores (p<0.001). Additionally, the analysis of patients' VAS scores revealed that the pre-procedure VAS scores decreased significantly more one month after the procedure in patients without a history of lumbar surgery than in patients with a history of lumbar surgery. Conclusions The findings of our study demonstrated that fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous epidural neuroplasty alleviated pain and improved physical functions and quality of life. In conclusion, percutaneous epidural neuroplasty is a safe and effective treatment method for patients with lumbar epidural fibrosis.

Impact of Sarcopenia on Percutaneous Epidural Balloon Neuroplasty in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: With the aging population, the incidence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is increasing. Sarcopenia is an age-related muscular decrease. Although epidural balloon neuroplasty is effective in patients with LSS refractory to conventional treatments, its effect has not been assessed in patients with sarcopenia. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of epidural balloon neuroplasty in patients with LSS and sarcopenia. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the following details from the electronic medical records: patient characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, stenosis grading, pain duration, location, pain intensity, and medications. Back and leg pain intensity was evaluated before and after the procedure at one, three, and six months during the follow-up period. A generalized estimating equations model was used at six months follow-up. Patients were divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups using the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle at the level of L3 on magnetic resonance imaging. Results: A total of 477 patients were included (sarcopenia group: 314 patients, 65.8%; non-sarcopenia group: 163 patients, 34.2%). Age, sex, body mass index, and medication quantification scale III were statistically different between both groups. The generalized estimating equations analyses-with unadjusted and adjusted estimation-revealed a significantly reduced pain intensity after the procedure compared to the baseline in both groups. The difference in pain intensity between both groups was not statistically different. Conclusions: Percutaneous epidural balloon neuroplasty may be considered for patients with chronic lumbar LSS regardless of accompanying sarcopenia.

Factors Associated with Successful Response to Balloon Decompressive Adhesiolysis Neuroplasty in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

Epidural neuroplasty, often called percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis, is often performed in refractory patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication. Recent studies have showed that decompressive adhesiolysis with an inflatable balloon catheter (balloon neuroplasty) is efficient in patients who experience refractory pain from epidural steroid injection or even epidural neuroplasty with a balloon-less catheter. However, exact indications or predictive factors for epidural balloon neuroplasty have not been fully evaluated. Therefore, to assess associated factors that could affect a favorable outcome, we analyzed a prospectively collected multicenter cohort of patients with chronic refractory lumbar foraminal stenosis after balloon neuroplasty. At the 6-month point in follow-up, 92 (44.4%) patients among 207 subjects were classified as successful responders according to a robust combination of outcome measures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also showed that mild grade lumbar foraminal stenosis may be an independent factor associated with a successful response 6 months after balloon neuroplasty (odds ratio = 2.829; 95% confidence interval = 1.351–5.923; p = 0.006). However, we found that there were 29.4% and 24.6% successful responders with moderate and severe foraminal stenosis, respectively. Attempting balloon neuroplasty in refractory lumbar foraminal stenosis, especially mild grade, may be worthwhile.

A review of the role of epidural percutaneous neuroplasty

Degeneration, whether from age or postsurgical, in the ventral and lateral epidural space can lead to irritation of both the nerve roots and of the nerves present in the epidural space, the peridural membrane and the posterior longitudinal ligament. This irritation is often accompanied by mild scarring. Neuroplasty is a specific procedure designed to relieve this irritation. The effectiveness of neuroplasty is not affected by the extent of spinal stenosis. Neuroplasty can be performed in the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine, and using caudal, transforaminal and interlaminar approaches. Postprocedural home exercises are an integral part of the procedure. There are multiple high-grade studies positive for the effectiveness and safety of neuroplasty. Neuroplasty should be offered prior to surgery in patients with persistent back and/or extremity pain.