Different nodal upstaging rates and prognoses for patients with clinical T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma classified according to the presence of solid components in the lung and mediastinal windows

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the correlation between nodal upstaging and pulmonary nodules classified according to the presence of solid components in the lung and mediastinal windows. This study thus aimed to analyze the risk factors of nodal upstaging and prognosis based on different imaging features, clinical characteristics, and pathological results from patients with clinical stage T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 340 patients between January 2016 and June 2017 were selected from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University database. Imaging features, clinical characteristics, and pathological results were collected for survival and analysis of nodal upstaging risk factors. We used logistic regression models to identify important metastatic risk factors for nodal upstaging. Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves and compared with the log-rank test. Significant prognostic risk factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 340 patients, with an average age of 64.89 (±8.775) years, were enrolled. Among them, nonnodal upstaging occurred both in 77 (22.6%) patients with pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) and in 30 (8.8%) patients with heterogenous ground-glass nodules (hGGNs). Compared to the 92 (27.1%) patients with real part-solid nodules (rPSNs), the 141 (41.5%) patients with solid nodules were significantly different in terms of in nodal upstaging (P<0.001). Moreover, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level >3.4 µg/L [odds ratio (OR): 2.931; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.511-5.688; P=0.001], imaging tumor size >18.3 mm (OR, 3.482; 95% CI: 1.609-7.535; P=0.002), and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) >0.788 (OR 8.791; 95% CI: 3.570-21.651; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for nodal upstaging. The KM survival curve results showed that patients with pGGNs and those with hGGNs had a much better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) than did those with rPSNs and those with solid nodules (DFS: 98.7% vs. 100% vs. 81.4% vs. 73.7%, P<0.001; OS: 97.4% vs. 100% vs. 90.2% vs. 83.7%, P=0.003). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis of patients with rPSNs and solid nodules, tumor location and pathological lymph node grade were found to be independent risk factors for DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pGGNs and those with hGGNs were more likely to be free of nodal upstaging and had better prognosis than did those with clinical stage IA rPSNs and solid nodules. The patients with pGGNs or hGGNs with preoperative CEA level <3.4 µg/L, imaging tumor size <18.3 mm, and CTR <0.788 can choose systematic lymph node sampling (SLNS) or decline lymph node dissection to avoid postoperative complications.

Oncological Outcomes of Robotic Lobectomy and Radical Lymphadenectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: While the thoracotomy approach was considered the gold standard until two decades ago, robotic surgery has increasingly strengthened its role in lung cancer treatment, improving patients’ peri-operative outcomes. In this study, we report our experience in robotic lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, with particular attention to oncological outcomes and nodal upstaging rate. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent lobectomy and radical lymphadenectomy at our Institute between 2016 and 2020. We selected 299 patients who met the inclusion criteria of the study. We analyzed the demographic features of the groups as well as their nodal upstaging rate after pathological examination. Then, we analyzed disease-free and overall survival of the entire enrolled patient population and we compared the same oncological outcomes in the upstaging and the non-upstaging group. Results: A total of 299 patients who underwent robotic lobectomy were enrolled. After surgery, 55 patients reported nodal hilar or mediastinal upstaging. The 3-year overall survival of the entire population was 82.8%. The upstaging group and the non-upstaging group were homogeneous for age, gender, smoking habits, clinical stage, tumor site, tumor histology. The non-upstaging group had better OS (p = 0.004) and DFS (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our results show that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of early-stage NSCLC, especially for its accuracy in mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The oncological outcomes were encouraging and consistent with previous findings.

Factors Associated with Nodal Upstaging in Clinical T1a-bN0M0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

Nodal upstaging of lung adenocarcinoma occurs when unexpected pathological lymph node metastasis is found after surgical intervention, and may be associated with a worse prognosis. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictive factors of nodal upstaging in cT1a-bN0M0 primary lung adenocarcinoma. We retrospectively reviewed a prospective database (January 2011 to May 2017) at National Taiwan University Hospital and identified patients with cT1a-bN0M0 (solid part tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm) lung adenocarcinoma who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Logistic regression models and survival analysis were used to examine and compare the predictive factors of nodal upstaging. A total of 352 patients were included. Among them, 28 (7.8%) patients had nodal upstaging. Abnormal preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, solid part tumor diameter ≥ 1.3 cm, and consolidation-tumor (C/T) ratio ≥ 0.50 on chest computed tomography (CT) were significant predictive factors associated with nodal upstaging, and patients with nodal upstaging tended to have worse survival. Standard lobectomy is recommended for patients with these predictive factors. If neither of the predictive factors are positive, a less invasive procedure may be a reasonable alternative. Further studies are needed to verify these data.

Prognosis of upstaged N1 and N2 disease after curative resection in patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Nodal upstaging occasionally occurs after curative resection in clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of clinical N0 NSCLC (T1-2, tumor size 5 cm or smaller) after upstaging to pathologic N1 or N2.

Methods

From 2005 to 2015, 676 consecutive patients were diagnosed with clinical T1-2N0 NSCLC and underwent curative resection. Among these, tumors were upstaged to N1 in 46 patients and to N2 in 24 patients. We analyzed the prognosis of upstaged tumors. For comparison of prognosis between nodal upstaging groups and others in the same stage, patients with preoperative pathologically proven N1 (n=31) and N2 (n=55) NSCLC were included in the study.

Results

A total of 70 patients (10.4%) had nodal upstaging after curative resection of clinical N0 NSCLC. Upstaging to N1 occurred in 46 patients and upstaging to N2 occurred in 24 patients. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was not statistically different between the upstaged and non-upstaged N1/N2 groups in N1 disease (73.3% vs. 70.5%, P=0.247) or in N2 disease (58.9% vs. 50.7%, P=0.283). Multivariate analysis showed that nodal upstaging was not a significant prognostic factor in N1 or N2 NSCLC (hazard ratio =0.385, P=0.235; hazard ratio =0.677, P=0.458).

Conclusions

Postoperative nodal upstaging from clinical T1-2N0 NSCLC was not a significant prognostic factor in the same stage. Therefore, surgical treatment of clinical T1-2N0 lung cancer diagnosed by imaging without preoperative pathologic lymph node staging can be a treatment option.

Nodal upstaging: effects of instrumentation and three-dimensional view in clinical stage I lung cancer

Nodal upstaging after surgical intervention for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is defined as the presence of unsuspected pathologic hilar (pN1) or mediastinal (pN2) disease detected during the final histopathologic evaluation of surgical specimens. The prevalence of pathologic nodal upstaging is used as a quality measure for the definition of the completeness of the nodal dissection. Risk factors for nodal upstaging may be patient-related (history of tuberculosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetes mellitus), or tumor-related (central tumor, higher T stage, higher SUVmax value, or adenocarcinoma). Actually, the theorical superiority of a minimally invasive resections is the lymph node dissection. Studies may suggest that, expert video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) surgeon could do similar lymph node dissection as it is done in open. Robotic surgeons may replicate the results of lymph node dissection in the open techniques. The possible reason for this is the instrumental superiority provided by the higher technology.

Predictors of Clinicopathologic Stage Discrepancy in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study

Objective To determine the frequency, associated factors, and prognosis of clinicopathologic stage discrepancy in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Study Design Retrospective study using a national database. Setting National Cancer Database. Subjects and Methods Cases of OPSCC diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013, with full clinical and pathologic staging information available were identified. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment variables associated with overall stage discrepancy were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results In total, 7731 cases of OPSCC were identified. Overall stage discrepancy was present in 30.2% of cases (21.9% upstaging, 8.2% downstaging). A total of 13.1% of cases were T-upstaged, and 10.5% of cases were T-downstaged; 22.9% of cases were N-upstaged, and 8.6% of cases were N-downstaged. Upstaging by overall stage was associated with a high Charlson-Deyo score, high tumor grade, number of lymph nodes examined, and increasing tumor size. No factors were positively associated with downstaging. High tumor grade was negatively associated with downstaging. For stage II, III, and IVA tumors, upstaging was associated with poorer OS. Conclusion Clinicopathologic stage discrepancy is common in OPSCC and is likely attributable to insensitive clinical staging techniques as well as to intrinsic tumor biologic properties. Upstaging is associated with poorer prognosis, which is likely due to advancement of disease.

Nodal management and upstaging of disease: initial results from the Italian VATS Lobectomy Registry

BACKGROUND

VATS lobectomy is an established option for the treatment of early-stage NSCLC. Complete lymph node dissection (CD), systematic sampling (SS) or resecting a specific number of lymph nodes (LNs) and stations are possible intra-operative LN management strategies.

METHODS

All VATS lobectomies from the "Italian VATS Group" prospective database were retrospectively reviewed. The type of surgical approach (CD or SS), number of LN resected (RN), the positive/resected LN ratio (LNR) and the number and types of positive LN stations were recorded. The rates of nodal upstaging were assessed based on different LN management strategies.

RESULTS

CD was the most frequent approach (72.3%). Nodal upstaging rates were 6.03% (N0-to-N1), 5.45% (N0-to-N2), and 0.58% (N1-to-N2). There was no difference in N1 or N2 upstaging rates between CD and SS. The number of resected nodes was correlated with both N1 (OR =1.02; CI, 1.01-1.04; P=0.03) and N2 (OR =1.02; CI, 1.01-1.05; P=0.001) upstaging. Resecting 12 nodes had the best ability to predict upstaging (6 N1 LN or 7 N2 LN). The finding of two positive LN stations best predicted N2 upstaging [area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) =0.98].

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal upstaging (and, indirectly, the effectiveness of intra-operative nodal management) cannot be predicted based on the surgical technique (CD or SS). A quantitative assessment of intra-operative LN management may be a more appropriate and measurable approach to justify the extension of LN resection during VATS lobectomy.