Light Cupula: To Be Or Not to Be?

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) represents the most common form of positional vertigo. It is caused by dislodged otoconia that freely float in the semicircular canals (canalolithiasis) or attach to the cupula (cupulolithiasis). A cupulolithiasis-type (or a heavy cupula-type) of BPPV implicating the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) exhibits persistent ageotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) in a head-roll test. However, in some cases, unlike any type of BPPV, persistent geotropic DCPN cannot be explained by any mechanisms of BPPV, and don't fit the current classifications. Recently, the notion of light cupula has been introduced to refer to the persistent geotropic DCPN. In this study, we looked at the clinical features of light cuplula and discussed the possible mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of the condition. The notion of light cupula is a helpful addition to the theory of peripheral positional vertigo and nystagmus.

Differences in the Head Roll Test, Bow and Lean Test, and Null Plane between Persistent and Transient Geotropic Direction-Changing Positional Nystagmus

Background: Persistent geotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) has the characteristics of cupulopathy, but its underlying pathogenesis is not known. We investigated the relationship of the results of the head roll test, bow and lean test, and side of the null plane between persistent and transient geotropic DCPN to determine the lesion side of persistent geotropic DCPN and understand its mechanism. Methods: We enrolled 25 patients with persistent geotropic DCPN and 41 with transient geotropic DCPN. We compared the results of the head roll test, bow and lean test, and side of the null plane between the two groups. Results: The rates of bowing and leaning nystagmus were significantly higher in the persistent DCPN group. Only 16.0% of the persistent DCPN patients had stronger nystagmus in the head roll test and the null plane on the same side. The rates of the direction of bowing nystagmus in the bow and lean test and stronger nystagmus in the head roll test on the same side were also significantly lower in persistent DCPN than in transient DCPN. Conclusion: It was difficult to determine the lesion side in persistent geotropic DCPN using the direction of stronger nystagmus in the head roll test and null plane when the direction of the stronger nystagmus and null plane were opposite. Further study is needed to understand the position of the cupula according to head rotation and the anatomical position in persistent geotropic DCPN.

[Horizontal semicircular canals light cupulopathy: 2 cases report]

SummaryAnalyze 2 cases of horizontal semicircular canals light cupulopathy patient history, clinical manifestations, vestibular function and hearing test results, summarize the clinical features of the disease. All of the 2 patients showed a typicaln light cupulopathy nystagmus. That is, the nystagmus of the Roll-Test test is sustained to the ground, and there is no latency and attenuation with null plane. When the patient's nystagmus is characterized by direction changing positional nystagmus and head deflection nystagmus disappearance（null plane）, the possibility of horizontal semicircular canals light cupulopathy is to be thought of. In this paper, 2 cases of horizontal semicircular canals light cupulopathy received in our hospital are reported as follows.

Clinical Findings in Patients With Persistent Positional Nystagmus: The Designation of "Heavy and Light Cupula"

Objective: Direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) had been observed as persistent horizontal apogeotropic and was considered as “cupulolithiasis or heavy cupula. ” Recently, the concept of “light cupula” exhibiting persistent geotropic DCPN has been introduced. However, the light cupula is not systematically described, while the identification and diagnosis of “light cupula” should be improved. Here we investigated the underlying characteristics and therapeutic options designed to the “light” and “heavy” cupula, respectively; and summarized the clinical characteristics and therapeutic effect in the two groups.

Methods: A total of 359 cases with vertigo and bilateral DCPN were found in the supine roll test. Only 25 patients with persistent DCPN were enrolled and followed up. According to the direction of nystagmus, we further divided the patients into “heavy cupula” (apogeotropic) and “light cupula” (geotropic) groups. We compared the incidence, characteristics of nystagmus and the efficacy of repositioning maneuver in the two groups.

Results: Nine patients with persistent horizontal geotropic DCPN were confirmed as “light cupula,” other 16 patients with persistent horizontal ageotropic DCPN were confirmed as heavy cupula. All 25 patients had null plane; the mean value and standard deviation of the null plane in light cupula and heavy cupula was 25.67 ± 9.31° and 27.06 ± 6.29°, respectively. The mean value and standard deviation of the termination plane in light cupula was 28.78 ± 10.00°, and 30.25 ± 6.53° in heavy cupula. There was no statistical significance between the two groups. We found that the direction of evoked nystagmus in the supine position was toward the intact side in light cupula, while in heavy cupula, it was toward the lesion side. The null plane appeared on the lesion side. For light cupula patients, the effect was not obvious at Day-7 after the treatment, however, treatment for most heavy cupula patients were effective. All patients recovered after 30 days of treatment.

Conclusion: The null plane is crucial in determining the lesion side for light or heavy cupula. Although the short-term therapeutic effect of the light cupula is not as promising as the effect seen in heavy cupula, the long-term prognosis in both groups is comparable; with all patients recovered after 30 days of treatment.

Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study.

Persistent geotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus with a null plane: the light cupula

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical features and typical positional nystagmus in patients with persistent geotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) and address the possible pathophysiology of the disease. Furthermore, the proportion of light cupula among the patients showing geotropic DCPN was investigated to assume the incidence of light cupula in those patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective case series study in 19 patients with persistent geotropic DCPN. Positional nystagmus during the bow and lean test and the supine head roll test was analyzed using videonystagmography.

RESULTS

All of the 19 patients showed persistent geotropic DCPN without latency. A null plane in which the nystagmus ceases was identified in all of 19 patients, and the intensity of nystagmus was stronger on one side in13 patients (68%) on supine head roll test. Overall, the affected side could be identified in 18 patients (95%). About 14.2% (19 of 134) of patients with geotropic DCPN could be diagnosed as having light cupula in the horizontal semicircular canal.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with light cupula show persistent geotropic DCPN without latency. Affected side(s) can be determined by the direction and intensity of the characteristic positional nystagmus and the side of the null plane. The pathophysiology and treatment of light cupula still remain to be elucidated.