Anxiety Reaction in Children During Cast Removal using Oscillating Saw versus Cast Shear - A Randomised, Prospective Trial

Introduction:

To compare the anxiety levels demonstrated by children during cast removal procedure between oscillating saw vs cast shear methods.

Material and methods:

A randomised prospective study of 102 children (mean age 8.3 ± 3.5 years) with fractures involving upper or lower limbs. Children undergoing removal of cast were divided into 2 groups; either by an oscillating saw or a cast cutting shear. The level of anxiety was assessed by recording the heart rate with a portable fingertip pulse oximeter before, during and after removal of the cast. Objective assessment was performed by documenting the fear level on Children’s Fear Scale (CFS).

Results:

There was a significant increase in the heart rate of children during cast removal while using the oscillating saw compared to cast shear (p<0.05). The noise level produced by the saw exceeded 80 dB (mean 103.3 dB). The fear level was significantly lower in the cast shear group (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

The noise produced by the oscillating saw was associated with an increased anxiety level in children undergoing cast removal. Cast shear is a simple and inexpensive instrument that can be used for cast removal in overly anxious children.

Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Cadaveric Skull Opening: A New Method of Autopsy Procedure

Background: Sawing of bone is an essential part of an autopsy procedure. An oscillating saw always generates noise, fine infectious dust particles, and the possibility of traumatic injuries, all of which can induce occupational hazard risks to autopsy workers, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objectives: The first goal of this study was to explore the production of noise and bone dust emission, comparing an oscillating saw and a robotic autopsy saw during an autopsy. The second goal was to evaluate the performance of a new robotic autopsy method, used during skull opening. The third goal was to encourage mortuary workers to use robotic technology during the autopsy procedure to protect us away from occupational injuries as well as airborne infections. Materials and Methods: The experiments involved a comparison of noise levels and aerosol production during skull cutting between the oscillating saw and the robotic autopsy saw. Results: The results confirmed that noise production from the robotic autopsy saw was lower than the oscillating saw. However, the bone dust levels, produced by the robotic autopsy saw, were greater than the oscillating saw, but were not greater than the dust concentrations which were present before opening the skull. Conclusions: The use of a new robotic system might be an alternative choice for protecting against occupational damage among the healthcare workers. Further research might attempt to consider other healthcare problems which occur in the autopsy workplace and apply the robotic-assisted technology in autopsy surgery.

How should the chest wall be opened at necropsy?

AIMS

To compare several different instruments used to open the chest wall during necropsy and to assess whether any one type reduced the production of sharp rib ends and thus the potential for receiving an injury.

METHODS

During the necropsy the pathologist opened the chest wall using two randomly assigned instruments from a selection of hand saw, electric saw, rib shears, and bread knife. The age, weight, sex, and height of the deceased were recorded, in addition to the textures of the resultant exposed rib ends. During the procedure, the speed, length, production of spray, and site of incision were also noted. The thoracic cavity was inspected and any details of tumours, adhesions, fluid, or organ damage were noted.

RESULTS

Twenty four necropsies were carried out on an equal number of men and women. The total number of ribs that were incised was 422, with 206 through the bony aspect (49%). Sixty seven per cent of the bony rib ends were rough, and this was found to be instrument dependent. The rib shears produced the highest number of rough bony and cartilage rib ends. The electric saw produced the smoothest contoured rib ends. Spray occurred in 29% of cases, exclusively with the use of the electric saw. Organ damage was most frequently associated with the use of the bread knife.

CONCLUSION

Rib shears, the instrument most frequently used to open the chest wall, appear to cause the highest frequency of rough, potentially dangerous rib ends. The electric saw produced the smoothest rib ends, both in cartilage and bone, and thus seems to offer the most efficacious method of reducing the potential hazard associated with ragged, spiky bone ends during the opening of the thoracic cavity. Although each of the procedures detailed in this study was shown to have its own advantages and disadvantages, personal preference and operator experience are perhaps the most important factors in ultimately determining the method used.